2 resultados para Vehicle Holding
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
Purpose. To evaluate trends in the utilization of head, abdominal, thoracic and other body regions CTs in the management of victims of MVC at a level I trauma center from 1996 to 2006.^ Method. From the trauma registry, I identified patients involved in MVC's in a level I trauma center and categorized them into three age groups of 13-18, 19-55 and ≥56. I used International Classification of Disease (ICD-9-CM) codes to find the type and number of CTs examinations performed for each patient. I plotted the mean number of CTs per patient against year of admission to find the crude estimate of change in utilization pattern for each type of CT. I used logistic regression to assess whether repetitive CTs (≥ 2) for head, abdomen, thorax and other body regions were associated with age group and year of admission for MVC patients. I adjusted the estimates for gender, ethnicity, insurance status, mechanism and severity of injury, intensive care unit admission status, patient disposition (dead or alive) and year of admission.^ Results. Utilization of head, abdominal, thoracic and other body regions CTs significantly increased over 11-year period. Utilization of head CT was greatest in the 13-18 age group, and increased from 0.58 CT/patient in 1996 to 1.37 CT/patient in 2006. Abdominal CTs were more common in the ≥56+ age group, and increased from 0.33 CT/patient in 1996 to 0.72 CT/patient in 2006. Utilization of thoracic CTs was higher in the 56+ age group, and increased from 0.01 CT/patient in 1996 to 0.42 CT/patient in 2006. Utilization of other CTs did not change materially during the study period for adolescents, adults or older adults. In the multivariable analysis, after adjustment for potential confounders, repetitive head CTs significantly increased in the 13-18 age group (95% CI: 1.29-1.87, p=<0.001) relative to the 19-55 age group. Repetitive thoracic CT use was lower in adolescents (95% CI: 0.22-0.70, p=<0.001) relative to the 19-55 age group.^ Conclusion. There has been a substantial increase in the utilization of head, abdominal, thoracic and other CTs in the management of MVC patients. Future studies need to identify if increased utilization of CTs have resulted in better health outcome for these patients. ^
Resumo:
Hot foods served in foodservice establishments, institutions and homes, have always been regarded as safe, since cooking temperatures are more likely to kill the bacterial agents that may cause foodborne diseases. However, foods that are otherwise served hot have been epidemiologically incriminated for causing foodborne diseases. This situation arises due to the possible post-cooking food contamination. Post-cooking contamination of hot-held food is most threatening for it gives the contaminating agents the possibility of proliferation. On one hand, post-cooking contamination is least understood and on the other, hot-holding of food gives the consumer a false sense of freedom from foodborne diseases. In this study, the dynamics of food contamination before or after cooking and during hot-holding are discussed and a food contamination dynamics model is presented.^ The literature on foodborne cholera, cholera-like diarrhea, shigellosis and E. coli gastroenteritis together with the literature on the occurrence and growth of the causative enteropathogens; 01 V. cholerae, non-01 V. cholerae, S. sonnei, S. flexneri and E. coli were reviewed. The literature on the infective doses of these organisms were also cited.^ In the study, four cooked food types held hot at 40-60(DEGREES)C were deliberately contaminated with 01 V. cholerae, non-01 V. cholerae, S. sonnei, S. flexneri and E. coli, one at a time at each of the hot-holding temperatures. Tested food samples for the recovery of these enteropathogens were withdrawn at various time intervals of hot holding.^ The results showed bacterial recovery to decline with increasing temperature and with increasing hot-holding time within each holding temperature. All the bacterial types except V. cholerae were recovered even after holding the food at 60(DEGREES)C for one hour. V. cholerae was not recovered after hot-holding the food at 50-60(DEGREES)C at certain holding periods. After 48 hrs incubation, V. cholerae was recovered on TCBS agar plates that read negative after the initial 24 hrs of incubation. Effective hot-holding temperatures were determined for each of the food types contaminated by each of the bacterial types.^ Statistical analysis of the collected data showed temperature, bacterial type and their interaction to be significant in enteropathogen recovery. Food type and its interactions with temperature and bacterial type were found not significant. ^