COMPREHENSIVE CALCULATION-BASED IMRT QA USING R&V DATA, TREATMENT RECORDS, AND A SECOND TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM

Purpose: Traditional patient-specific IMRT QA measurements are labor intensive and consume machine time. Calculation-based IMRT QA methods typically are not comprehensive. We have developed a comprehensive calculation-based IMRT QA method to detect uncertainties introduced by the initial dose calculation, the data transfer through the Record-and-Verify (R&V) system, and various aspects of the physical delivery. Methods: We recomputed the treatment plans in the patient geometry for 48 cases using data from the R&V, and from the delivery unit to calculate the “as-transferred” and “as-delivered” doses respectively. These data were sent to the original TPS to verify transfer and delivery or to a second TPS to verify the original calculation. For each dataset we examined the dose computed from the R&V record (RV) and from the delivery records (Tx), and the dose computed with a second verification TPS (vTPS). Each verification dose was compared to the clinical dose distribution using 3D gamma analysis and by comparison of mean dose and ROI-specific dose levels to target volumes. Plans were also compared to IMRT QA absolute and relative dose measurements. Results: The average 3D gamma passing percentages using 3%-3mm, 2%-2mm, and 1%-1mm criteria for the RV plan were 100.0 (σ=0.0), 100.0 (σ=0.0), and 100.0 (σ=0.1); for the Tx plan they were 100.0 (σ=0.0), 100.0 (σ=0.0), and 99.0 (σ=1.4); and for the vTPS plan they were 99.3 (σ=0.6), 97.2 (σ=1.5), and 79.0 (σ=8.6). When comparing target volume doses in the RV, Tx, and vTPS plans to the clinical plans, the average ratios of ROI mean doses were 0.999 (σ=0.001), 1.001 (σ=0.002), and 0.990 (σ=0.009) and ROI-specific dose levels were 0.999 (σ=0.001), 1.001 (σ=0.002), and 0.980 (σ=0.043), respectively. Comparing the clinical, RV, TR, and vTPS calculated doses to the IMRT QA measurements for all 48 patients, the average ratios for absolute doses were 0.999 (σ=0.013), 0.998 (σ=0.013), 0.999 σ=0.015), and 0.990 (σ=0.012), respectively, and the average 2D gamma(5%-3mm) passing percentages for relative doses for 9 patients was were 99.36 (σ=0.68), 99.50 (σ=0.49), 99.13 (σ=0.84), and 98.76 (σ=1.66), respectively. Conclusions: Together with mechanical and dosimetric QA, our calculation-based IMRT QA method promises to minimize the need for patient-specific QA measurements by identifying outliers in need of further review.

Analysis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB6 and VirB9 of the VirB /D4 type IV secretion system

Agrobacterium tumefaciens uses the VirB/D4 type IV secretion system (T4SS) to translocate oncogenic DNA (T-DNA) and protein substrates to plant cells. Independent of VirD4, the eleven VirB proteins are also essential for elaboration of a conjugative pilus termed the T pilus. The focus of this thesis is the characterization and analysis of two VirB proteins, VirB6 and VirB9, with respect to substrate translocation and T pilus biogenesis. Observed stabilizing effects of VirB6 on other VirB subunits and results of protein-protein interaction studies suggest that VirB6 mediates assembly of the secretion machine and T pilus through interactions with VirB7 and VirB9. Topology studies support a model for VirB6 as a polytopic membrane protein with a periplasmic N terminus, a large internal periplasmic loop, five transmembrane segments, and a cytoplasmic C terminus. Topology studies and Transfer DNA immunoprecipitation (TrIP) assays identified several important VirB6 functional domains: (i) the large internal periplasmic loop mediates interaction of VirB6 with the T-DNA, (ii) the membrane spanning region carboxyl-terminal to the large periplasmic loop mediates substrate transfer from VirB6 to VirB8, and (iii) the terminal regions of VirB6 are required for substrate transfer to VirB2 and VirB9. To analyze structure-function relationships of VirB9, the phenotypic consequences of dipeptide insertion mutations were characterized. Substrate discriminating mutations were shown to selectively export the oncogenic T-DNA and VirE2 to plant cells or a mobilizable IncQ plasmid to bacterial cells. Mutations affecting VirB9 interactions with VirB7 and VirB10 were localized to the C- and N- terminal regions respectively. Additionally, “uncoupling” mutations identified in VirB11 and VirB6 that block T pilus assembly, but not substrate transfer to recipient cells, were also identified in VirB9. These results in conjunction with computer analysis establish that VirB9, like VirB6, is also composed of distinct regions or domains that contribute in various ways to secretion channel activity and T pilus assembly. Lastly, in vivo immunofluorescent studies suggest that VirB9 localizes to the outer membrane and may play a role similar to that of secretion/ushers of types II and III secretion systems to facilitate substrate translocation across this final bacterial barrier. ^