Forebrain-cerebellum interactions revealed by trace eyelid conditioning

While it is commonly assumed that brain systems receive and process information from other brain systems, there are few examples of tractable behaviors that allow such interactions to be studied. With the experiments presented in this dissertation we provide evidence that trace eyelid conditioning, a simple form of associative learning, is mediated by cerebellar learning in response to the output of persistent neural activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and thus may be useful in analyses of PFC-cerebellar interactions. In a series of stimulation and reversible inactivation experiments we provide evidence that trace eyelid conditioning is mediated by cerebellar learning in response to a learned forebrain-driven input. Specifically, we provide evidence that this input is driven by the medial PFC and persists through the stimulus free trace interval of trace eyelid conditioning. In the next set of experiments we show that directly presenting the cerebellum with a pattern of input that mimics the classic persistent activity of PFC neurons reconstitutes trace eyelid conditioning, as assessed by a number of stringent tests. Finally, in set of reversible inactivation experiments, we provide evidence that bidirectional learning during trace eyelid conditioning involves the omission of the persistent, PFC-driven input that the cerebellum learns and responds to during trace eyelid conditioning. Given that persistent activity in PFC is often associated with working memory, these experiments suggest that trace eyelid conditioning may be useful in analyses of working memory mechanisms, cerebellar information processing and their interaction. To facilitate future analyses, we conclude with a working hypothesis of forebrain-cerebellum interactions during trace eyelid conditioning that addresses how persistent activity in PFC is induced and how the cerebellum decodes and uses PFC-driven input. ^

SABR for early-stage lung cancer: Early-adoption and future directions

Early-stage lung cancer incidence among older adults is expected to increase due to demographic trends and CT-based screening, yet optimal treatment of lung cancer in the elderly remains controversial. There are several accepted strategies for treating lung cancer including surgery, conventional radiation, and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). However, there are currently no randomized controlled trials to help distinguish the comparative effectiveness of these various strategies. This is an unfortunate omission as lung cancer causes the most deaths among all cancers in the United States (as well as the entire world). SABR holds particular promise as it is a completely non-invasive, ambulatory technique for achieving cure without an operation, thus avoiding the risks of surgery and the associated pre-operative and post-operative costs. To provide fair view of the potential effect on SABR on controlling lung cancer in the United States, a systematic review of SABR with a focus on its achieved outcomes, toxicities, and comparison to conventional radiation and surgical options is presented. ^