Phototaxis signaling by the membrane complex of archaeal sensory rhodopsins and their transducers

Sensory rhodopsins I and II (SRI and SRII) are visual pigment-like phototaxis receptors in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum. The receptor proteins each consist of a single polypeptide that folds into 7 $\alpha$-helical membrane-spanning segments forming an internal pocket where the chromophore retinal is bound. They transmit signals to their tightly bound transducer proteins, HtrI and HtrII, respectively, which in turn control a phosphotransfer pathway modulating the flagellar motors. SRI-HtrI mediates attractant responses to orange-light and repellent responses to UV light, while SRII-HtrII mediates repellent response to blue light. Experiments were designed to analyze the molecular processes in the SR-Htr complexes responsible for receptor activation, which previously had been shown by our laboratory to involve proton transfer reactions of the retinylidene Schiff base in the photoactive site, transfer of signals from receptor to transducer, and signaling specificity by the receptor-transducer complex.^ Site-directed mutagenesis and laser-flash kinetic spectroscopy revealed that His-166 in SRI (i) plays a role in the proton transfers both to and from the Schiffbase, either as a structurally critical residue or possibly as a direct participant, (ii) is involved in the modulation of SIU photoreaction kinetics by HtrI, and (iii) modulates the pKa of Asp-76, an important residue in the photoactive site, through a long-distance electrostatic interaction. Computerized cell tracking and motion analysis demonstrated that (iv) His-166 is crucial in phototaxis signaling: a spectrum of substitutions either eliminate signaling or greatly perturb the activation process that produces attractant and repellent signaling states of the receptor.^ The signaling states of SRI are communicated to HtrI, whose oligomeric structure and conformational changes were investigated by engineered sulfhydryl probes. It was found that signaling by the SRI-HtrI complex involves reversible conformational changes within a preexisting HtrI dimer, which is likely accomplished through a slight winding or unwinding of the two HtrT monomers via their loose coiled coil association. To elucidate which domains of the Htr dimers confer specificity for interaction with SRI or SRII, chimeras of HtrI and HtrII were constructed. The only determinant needed for functional and specific interaction with SRI or SRII was found to be the four transmembrane segments of the HtrI or HtrII dimers, respectively. The entire cytoplasmic parts of HtrI and HtrII, which include the functionally important signaling and adaptation domains, were interchangeable.^ These observations support a model in which SRI and SRII undergo conformational changes coupled to light-induced proton transfers in their photoactive sites, and that lateral helix-helix interactions with their cognate transducers' 4-helix bundle in the membrane relay these conformational changes into different states of the Htr proteins which regulate the down-stream phosphotransfer pathway. ^

The role of menaquinone in the nitrate reductase complex

Membrane bound, respiratory nitrate reductase in Escherichia coli is composed of three subunits, αβγ. The active complex is anchored to the membrane by membrane-integrated γ subunit and can reduce nitrate to nitrite with membrane quinones, (ubiquinone or menaquinone) as physiological electron donors. The transfer of electrons through the complex is thought to involve the sequence: membrane quinols → b-type hemes (γ subunit) → Fe-S centers (β subunit) → molybdopterin (α subunit) → nitrate. The enzyme can be assayed with the artificial electron donor reduced methyl viologen (MVH) which transfers electrons directly to the molybdopterin cofactor. These studies have focused on the possible role of protein-bound menaquinone in the structure and function of this multisubunit complex. ^ Nitrate reductase was purified as two distinct forms; after solubilization of membrane proteins with detergents, purification rendered an αβγ complex (holoenzyme) which catalyzes nitrate reduction with MVH or the quinols analogs, menadiol and duroquinol, as electron donors. Alternatively, heat-treatment of the membranes in the absence of detergents and subsequent purification of the active enzyme produced an αβ complex, which reduces nitrate only with MVH as electron donor. The active αβ dimer was also separated from γ subunit by heat treatment of the holoenzyme. ^ Menaquinone-9 was isolated directly from the purified αβ complex, and identified by mass spectrometry. Based on the composition of the membrane quinone pool, it was concluded that menaquinone-9 is sequestered from the membrane pool in a specifically protein-bound form. ^ The role of the bound menaquinone in the structure-function of nitrate reductase was also investigated, along with its participation in UV-light inactivation of the enzyme. Menaquinone-depleted nitrate reductase from a menaquinone deficient mutant retained activity with all electron donors and it remained sensitive to UV inactivation. However, the MVH-nitrate reductase activity and the rate of UV inactivation of the enzyme were significantly reduced and the optical properties of the enzyme were modified by the absence of the bound menaquinone-9. ^ Menaquinone-9 is not absolutely required for electron transfer in nitrate reductase but it appears to be specifically-bound during assembly of the complex and to enhance the transfer of electrons through the complex. The possible plasticity of the functional electron transfer pathway in nitrate reductase is discussed. ^

Protein-protein interaction between phototaxis receptor sensory Rhodopsin I and its transducer HtrI

The molecular complex containing the seven transmembrane helix photoreceptor S&barbelow;ensory R&barbelow;hodopsin I&barbelow; (SRI) and transducer protein HtrI (H&barbelow;alobacterial Transducer for SRI&barbelow;) mediates color-sensitive phototaxis responses in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum. Orange light causes an attractant response by a one-photon reaction and white light (orange + UV light) a repellent response by a two-photon reaction. Three aspects of SRI-HtrI structure/function and the signal transduction pathway were explored. First, the coupling of HtrI to the photoactive site of SRI was analyzed by mutagenesis and kinetic spectroscopy. Second, SRI-HtrI mutations and suppressors were selected and characterized to elucidate the color-sensing mechanism. Third, the signal relay through the transducer-bound histidine kinase was analyzed using an in vitro reconstitution system with known and newly identified taxis components. ^ Twenty-one mutations on HtrI were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis. Several replacements of charged residues perturbed the photochemical kinetics of SRI which led to the finding of a cluster of residues at the membrane/cytoplasm interface in HtrI electrostatically coupled to the photoactive site of SRI. We found by laser-flash kinetic spectroscopy that the transducer and these residues have specific effects on the light-induced proton transfer between the retinal chromophore and the protein. ^ One of the mutations showed an unusual mutant phenotype we called “inverted” signaling, in which the cell produces a repellent response to normally attractant light. Therefore, this mutant (E56Q of HtrI) had lost the color-discrimination by the SRI-HtrI complex. We used suppressor analysis to better understand the phenotype. Certain suppressors resulted in return of attractant responses to orange light but with inversion of the normally repellent response to white light to an attractant response. To explain this and other results, we formulated the Conformational Shuttling model in which the HtrI-SRI complex is poised in a metastable equilibrium of two conformations shifted in opposite directions by orange and white light. We tested this model by behavioral analysis (computerized cell tracking and motion study) of double mutants of inverting and suppressing mutations and the results confirmed the equilibrium-shift explanation. ^ We developed an in vitro system for measuring the effect of purified transducer on the histidine-kinase CheAH that controls the flagellar motor switch. The rate of kinase autophosphorylation was stimulated >2 fold in the reconstitution of the complete signal transduction system from purified components from H. salinarum. The in vitro assay also showed that the kinase activity was reduced in the absence and in the presence of high levels of linker protein CheWH. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

Molecular interactions and signal transfer between sensory rhodopsin-I and its cognate transducer

SRI is unique among known photoreceptors in that it produces opposite signals depending on the color of light stimuli. Absorption of orange light (587 nm) triggers an attractant response by the cell, whereas absorption of orange light followed by near-UV light (373 run) triggers a repellent response. Using behavioral mutants that exhibit aberrant color-sensing ability, we tested a two-conformation equilibrium model, using FRET and EPR spectroscopy. The essence of the model applied to SRI-HtrI is that the complex exists in a metastable two-conformer equilibrium which is shifted in one direction by orange light absorption (producing an attractant signal) and in the opposite direction by a second UV-violet photon (producing a repellent signal). First, by FRET we found that the E-F cytoplasmic loop of SRI moves toward the RAMP domain of the HtrI transducer during the formation of the orange-light activated signaling state of the complex. This is the first localization of a change in the physical relationship between the receptor and transducer subunits of the complex and provides a structural property of the two proposed conformers that we can monitor. Second, EPR spectra of a spin label probe at this cytoplasmic position showed shifts in the dark in the mutants toward shorter or longer EF loop-RAMP distances, explaining their behavior in terms of their mutations causing pre-stimulus shifts into one or the other conformer. ^ Next, we applied a novel electrophysiological method for monitoring the directionality of proton movement during photoactivation of SRI, to investigate the process of proton transfer in the photoactive site from the chromophore to proton acceptors on both the wildtype and aberrant color-response mutants. We observed an unexpected and critical difference in the two signaling conformations of the SRI-HtrI complex. The finding is that the vectoriality (i.e. movement away or toward the cytoplasm) of the light-induced proton transfer from the chromophore to the protein is opposite in formation of the two conformations. Retinylidene proton transfer is a common critical process in rhodopsins and these results are the first to show differences in vectoriality in a rhodopsin receptor, and to demonstrate functional importance of the direction of proton transfer. ^

Mechanisms of adenovirus 5 E1A -mediated tumor suppression and E1A-mediated apoptosis

The adenovirus type 5 E1A gene products have numerous functions in cells, which serve as useful tools in studying the mechanisms of either oncogenesis or tumor suppression. To understand the mechanisms of E1A-mediated tumor suppression, we introduced an Ad5 E1A gene into murine melanoma cells, and characterized E1A-mediated biological functions both in vitro and in vivo. The results of the study indicated that: (i) Ad5 E1A mediated tumor suppression in rodent tumor cells; (ii) E1A-mediated tumor suppression is associated with E1A-mediated apoptosis in vivo.^ To determine which functional region(s) of E1A is(are) required for E1A-mediated apoptosis and whether E1A-mediated apoptosis is required for E1A-mediated tumor suppression, we established stable transfectants of E1A mutants, which have deletion mutation at either the N-terminal (p300-binding) or the CR2 (pRb-binding) domain or both, and then characterized biological functions both in vitro and in vivo. The results of the study indicate that the CR2 domain of E1A is required for E1A-mediated apoptosis, while the N-terminal domain of E1A is dispensable. Interestingly, either of the two domains is able to mediate tumor suppression, since mutant E1A with a single deletion at either domain still suppressed tumor growth. Importantly, deletion mutations at both the N-terminal and the CR2 domains of E1A abrogated E1A-mediated tumor suppression, suggesting both regions are required for E1A-mediated tumor suppression. The results demonstrate that E1A-mediated apoptosis is not the only mechanism for E1A-mediated tumor suppression. Thus, the N-terminal and CR2 domains of E1A mediated two independent mechanisms of tumor suppression.^ To understand the mechanism of E1A-mediated apoptosis, we examined the temporal relationship of molecular events during the apoptotic cascades after UV radiation and serum depletion in both the E1A-expressing cells and parental cells. Kinetic analysis of JNK activity indicates that the JNK pathway is greatly increased in response to UV light in E1A transfectants, suggesting that extracellular stress stimuli have been converted into intracellular stress signals with greater magnitude in E1A transfectants than those in parental cells. Thus, E1A-mediated sensitization precedes these events. As ceramide has been proposed as second messenger and upstream activator of JNK pathway for stress-induced apoptosis, we also examined the roles of ceramide in apoptosis and the relationship with JNK pathway. The results indicate that E1A transfectants do not have increased sensitivity to ceramide. Therefore, E1A-mediated sensitization to UV radiation cannot be attributed to an increased sensitivity to ceramide. Furthermore, UV-induced JNK activation correlates with UV-induced apoptosis, while lethal dose of ceramide does not activate JNK. Thus, activation of JNK pathway is independent of the ceramide pathway. In addition, E1A transfectants also have increased activation of NF-kB in response to UV. These results suggest that E1A-mediated sensitization is an early event which associates with conversion of extracellular stress stimuli into amplified intracellular signals. The mechanism of E1A-mediated sensitization and its relationship with other pathways are discussed. ^

Mechanisms involved in suppression of the elicitation of immune responses by ultraviolet light

The ultraviolet radiation (UVR) present in sunlight is the primary cause of nonmelanoma skin cancer and has been implicated in the development of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Ultraviolet radiation also suppresses the immune response. In the majority of studies investigating the mechanisms regulating UV-induced immune suppression, UV is used to suppress the induction of immune responses. Equally important, is the ability of UVR to suppress established immune responses, such as the recall reaction in humans, which protects against microbial infections. We established a murine model to help elucidate the immunological mechanisms governing UV-induced suppression of the elicitation of immune responses. 80 kJ/m2 of UVR nine days after sensitization consistently suppressed the elicitation of delayed type hypersensitivity reaction to C. albicans . We found ultraviolet A (320±400 nm) radiation was as effective as solar-simulated ultraviolet A + B (290±400 nm) in suppressing the elicitation of an established immune response. The mechanisms involved in UV-induced suppression of the induction & elicitation of the immune response are similar. For example, mice irradiated with UV after immunization generated antigen-specific T suppressor cells. Injection of monoclonal antibodies to IL-10 or recombinant IL-12 immediately after exposure to UVR blocked immune suppression. Liposomes containing bacteriophage T4N5 to the skin of mice also prevented immune suppression, demonstrating an essential role for ultraviolet-induced DNA damage in the suppression of established immune reactions. ^ In addition to damaging DNA, UV initiates immune suppression through the isomerization of urocanic acid in the epidermis. Here we provide evidence that cis-UCA induces systemic immunosuppression via the serotonin (5-hydroxyyryptamine; 5-HT) receptor. Biochemical and immunological analysis indicate that cis-UCA binds to, and activates, the serotonin receptor. Moreover, serotonin specific antibodies block UV- and/or cis-UCA-induced immune suppression. Our findings identify cis-UCA as novel serotonin receptor ligand and indicate that serotonin receptor engagement can activate immune suppression. Cumulatively, our data suggest that similar immune regulatory mechanisms are activated regardless of whether we expose mice to solar-simulated UV (UVA + UVB) radiation or UVA only, and that ultraviolet radiation activates similar immunologic pathways to suppress the induction or the elicitation of the immune response. ^