Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in children with pneumonia

In order to identify optimal therapy for children with bacterial pneumonia, Pakistan's ARI Program, in collaboration with the National Institute of Health (NIH), Islamabad, undertook a national surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. The project was carried out at selected urban and peripheral sites in 6 different regions of Pakistan, in 1991–92. Nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens and blood cultures were obtained from children with pneumonia diagnosed in the outpatient clinic of participating facilities. Organisms were isolated by local hospital laboratories and sent to NIH for confirmation, serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Following were the aims of the study (i) to determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae in children aged 2–59 months; (ii) to determine the ability of selected laboratories to identify and effectively transport isolates of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae cultured from nasopharyngeal and blood specimens; (iii) to validate the comparability of resistance patterns for nasopharyngeal and blood isolates of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae from children with pneumonia; and (iv) to examine the effect of drug resistance and laboratory error on the cost of effectively treating children with ARI. ^ A total of 1293 children with ARI were included in the study: 969 (75%) from urban areas and 324 (25%) from rural parts of the country. Of 1293, there were 786 (61%) male and 507 (39%) female children. The resistance rate of S. pneumoniae to various antibiotics among the urban children with ARI was: TMP/SMX (62%); chloramphenicol (23%); penicillin (5%); tetracycline (16%); and ampicillin/amoxicillin (0%). The rates of resistance of H. influenzae were higher than S. pneumoniae: TMP/SMX (85%); chloramphenicol (62%); penicillin (59%); ampicillin/amoxicillin (46%); and tetracycline (100%). There were similar rates of resistance to each antimicrobial agent among isolates from the rural children. ^ Of a total 614 specimens that were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, 432 (70.4%) were resistant to TMP/SMX and 93 (15.2%) were resistant to antimicrobial agents other than TMP/SMX viz. ampicillin/amoxicillin, chloramphenicol, penicillin, and tetracycline. ^ The sensitivity and positive predictive value of peripheral laboratories for H. influenzae were 99% and 65%, respectively. Similarly, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of peripheral laboratory tests compared to gold standard i.e. NIH laboratory, for S. pneumoniae were 99% and 54%, respectively. ^ The sensitivity and positive predictive value of nasopharyngeal specimens compared to blood cultures (gold standard), isolated by the peripheral laboratories, for H. influenzae were 88% and 11%, and for S. pneumoniae 92% and 39%, respectively. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)^

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance: Differences between natural and acquired adriamycin -resistant human colon carcinoma cells

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance (MDR) were studied in two independent MDR sublines (AdR1.2 and SRA1.2) derived from the established human colon carcinoma cell line LoVo. AdR1.2 was developed by long-term continuous exposure of the cells to adriamycin (AdR) in stepwise increments of concentration, while SRA1.2 was selected by repetitive pulse treatments with AdR at a single concentration. In this dissertation, the hypothesis that the mechanism of drug resistance in SRA1.2 is different than that in AdR1.2 is tested. While SRA1.2 demonstrated similar biological characteristics when compared to the parental LoVo, AdR1.2 exhibited remarkable alterations in biological properties. The resistance phenotype of AdR1.2 was reversible when the cells were grown in the drug-free medium whereas SRA1.2 maintained its resistance for at least 10 months under similar conditions. Km and Vmax of carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion AdR transport were similar among the three lines. However, both resistant sublines exhibited an energy-dependent drug efflux. AdR1.2 appeared to possess an activated efflux pump, and a decreased nucleus-binding of AdR, whereas SRA1.2 showed merely a lower affinity in binding of AdR to the nuclei. Southern blot analysis showed no amplification of the MDR1 gene in either of the two resistant subclones. However, Western blot analysis using the C219 monoclonal antibody against P170 glycoprotein detected a Mr 150-kDa plasma protein (P150) in AdR1.2 but not in SRA1.2 or in the parental LoVo. In vitro phosphorylation studies revealed that P150 was a phosphoprotein; its phosphorylation was Mg$\sp{2+}$-dependent and could be enhanced by verapamil, an agent capable of increasing intracellular AdR accumulation in AdR1.2 cells. The phosphorylation studies also revealed elevated phosphorylation of a Mr 66-kDa plasma membrane protein that was detectable in the AdR1.2 revertant and in AdR1.2 when verapamil was present, suggesting that hyperphosphorylation of the Mr 66-kDa protein may be related to the reversal of MDR. SDS-PAGE of the plasma membrane protein demonstrated overproduction of a Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa protein was not immunoreactive with C219, but its absence in the AdR1.2 revertant and the parental LoVo suggests that it is an MDR-related plasma membrane protein. In conclusion, the results from this study support the author's hypothesis that the mechanisms responsible for "Acquired" and "Natural" MDR are not identical. ^