The Neural Substrates of Multisensory Speech Perception

Comprehending speech is one of the most important human behaviors, but we are only beginning to understand how the brain accomplishes this difficult task. One key to speech perception seems to be that the brain integrates the independent sources of information available in the auditory and visual modalities in a process known as multisensory integration. This allows speech perception to be accurate, even in environments in which one modality or the other is ambiguous in the context of noise. Previous electrophysiological and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments have implicated the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) in auditory-visual integration of both speech and non-speech stimuli. While evidence from prior imaging studies have found increases in STS activity for audiovisual speech compared with unisensory auditory or visual speech, these studies do not provide a clear mechanism as to how the STS communicates with early sensory areas to integrate the two streams of information into a coherent audiovisual percept. Furthermore, it is currently unknown if the activity within the STS is directly correlated with strength of audiovisual perception. In order to better understand the cortical mechanisms that underlie audiovisual speech perception, we first studied the STS activity and connectivity during the perception of speech with auditory and visual components of varying intelligibility. By studying fMRI activity during these noisy audiovisual speech stimuli, we found that STS connectivity with auditory and visual cortical areas mirrored perception; when the information from one modality is unreliable and noisy, the STS interacts less with the cortex processing that modality and more with the cortex processing the reliable information. We next characterized the role of STS activity during a striking audiovisual speech illusion, the McGurk effect, to determine if activity within the STS predicts how strongly a person integrates auditory and visual speech information. Subjects with greater susceptibility to the McGurk effect exhibited stronger fMRI activation of the STS during perception of McGurk syllables, implying a direct correlation between strength of audiovisual integration of speech and activity within an the multisensory STS.

Practitioners' Views of Family Strengths: A Delphi Study

Reported is a research study to assess the opinions of family practitioners on the status of families in Oklahoma. Researchers employed the Delphi method to achieve consensus among key informants in the family practice field about the strengths and weaknesses of Oklahoma families, threats facing families in the state, and means to strengthening family life in Oklahoma. The study yielded qualitative data from the key informants, which the researchers then condensed into response categories to feed back to informants to rate. Family practitioners identified resilience, spirituality, and access to support systems as the greatest strengths, and listed substance abuse, poverty, and generational cycles of dysfunction as the greatest weaknesses of Oklahoma families. Recommendations by these practitioners are given for improvements in addressing family needs.

Caring Minds

Greetings Biobank and Centers model collaboration – Enable work of young researchers AccPhD Scholars Find First Year Exciting, Challenging Event Salutes AccPhD Donors Fay named to UT System’s Academy of Health Science Education PARTNERS Luncheon – Opera star hails nurses as “Beautiful Angels” at 2011 PARTNERS Spring Luncheon Hodges Voted School’s 2011 McGovern Outstanding Teacher Graduates soar– Steady growth and success of DNP program follows being first in Texas Reception honors Freds “Best Graduate Schools” – Guide ranks UTHealth tops in Texas/Newsbriefs Faculty Publications Faculty Research Endowed Faculty Positions

Community participation in health services

This study critically analyzes and synthesizes community participation (CP) theory across disciplines, defining and beginning to map out the elements of CP according to a preliminary framework of structure, process, intermediate outcomes, and ultimate outcomes. The first study component sought to determine the impact of Sight N' Soul, a CP project utilizing neighborhood health workers (NHWs), on appointment missing in an indigent urban African-American population. It found that persons entering the vision care system through contact with an NEW were about a third less likely to miss an appointment than those persons entering the system through some other avenue. While theory in this area remains too poorly developed to hypothesize causal relationships between structure, process, and outcomes, a summary of the elements of Sight N' Soul's structure and process both developed the preliminary framework and serves as a first step to mapping these relationships. The second component of the study uncovered the elements of structure and process that may contribute to a sustained egalitarian partnership between community people and professionals, a CP program called Project HEAL. Elements of Project HEAL's structure and process included a shared belief in the program; spirituality; contribution, ownership, and reciprocation; a feeling of family; making it together; honesty, trust, and openness about conflict; the inevitability of uncertainty and change; and the guiding interactional principles of respect; love, care, and compassion; and personal responsibility. The third component analyzed the existing literature, identifying and addressing gaps and inconsistencies and highlighting areas needing more highly developed ethical analysis. Focal issues include the political, economic, and historical context of CP; the power of naming; the issue of purpose; the nature of community; the power to muster and allocate resources; and the need to move to a systems view of health and well-being, expanding our understanding of the universe of potential outcomes of CP, including iatrogenic outcomes. Intermediate outcomes might include change in community, program, and individual capacity, as well as improved health care delivery. Ultimate outcomes include increased positive interdependencies and opportunities for contribution; improved mental, physical, and spiritual health; increased social justice; and decreased exploitation. ^