REPSA: A method for determining the sequence specificity of DNA binding ligands

We developed a novel combinatorial method termed restriction endonuclease protection selection and amplification (REPSA) to identify consensus binding sites of DNA-binding ligands. REPSA uses a unique enzymatic selection based on the inhibition of cleavage by a type IIS restriction endonuclease, an enzyme that cleaves DNA at a site distal from its recognition sequence. Sequences bound by a ligand are protected from cleavage while unprotected sequences are cleaved. This enzymatic selection occurs in solution under mild conditions and is dependant only on the DNA-binding ability of the ligand. Thus, REPSA is useful for a broad range of ligands including all classes of DNA-binding ligands, weakly binding ligands, mixed populations of ligands, and unknown ligands. Here I describe REPSA and the application of this method to select the consensus DNA-binding sequences of three representative DNA-binding ligands; a nucleic acid (triplex-forming single-stranded DNA), a protein (the TATA-binding protein), and a small molecule (Distamycin A). These studies generated new information regarding the specificity of these ligands in addition to establishing their DNA-binding sequences. ^

Roles of mismatch repair proteins in the recognition and processing of DNA interstrand crosslinks in human cells

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are among the most toxic type of damage to a cell. Many ICL-inducing agents are widely used as therapeutic agents, e.g. cisplatin, psoralen. A bettor understanding of the cellular mechanism that eliminates ICLs is important for the improvement of human health. However, ICL repair is still poorly understood in mammals. Using a triplex-directed site-specific ICL model, we studied the roles of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in ICL repair in human cells. We are also interested in using psoralen-conjugated triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) to direct ICLs to a specific site in targeted DNA and in the mammalian genomes. ^ MSH2 protein is the common subunit of two MMR recognition complexes, and MutSα and MutSβ. We showed that MSH2 deficiency renders human cell hypersensitive to psoralen ICLs. MMR recognition complexes bind specifically to triplex-directed psoralen ICLs in vitro. Together with the fact that psoralen ICL-induced repair synthesis is dramatically decreased in MSH2 deficient cell extracts, we demonstrated that MSH2 function is critical for the recognition and processing of psoralen ICLs in human cells. Interestingly, lack of MSH2 does not reduce the level of psoralen ICL-induced mutagenesis in human cells, suggesting that MSH2 does not contribute to error-generating repair of psoralen ICLs, and therefore, may represent a novel error-free mechanism for repairing ICLs. We also studied the role of MLH1, anther key protein in MMR, in the processing of psoralen ICLs. MLH1-deficient human cells are more resistant to psoralen plus UVA treatment. Importantly, MLH1 function is not required for the mutagenic repair of psoralen ICLs, suggesting that it is not involved in the error-generating repair of this type of DNA damage in human cells. ^ These are the first data indicating mismatch repair proteins may participate in a relatively error-free mechanism for processing psoralen ICL in human cells. Enhancement of MMR protein function relative to nucleotide excision repair proteins may reduce the mutagenesis caused by DNA ICLs in humans. ^ In order to specifically target ICLs to mammalian genes, we identified novel TFO target sequences in mouse and human genomes. Using this information, many critical mammalian genes can now be targeted by TFOs.^

Involvement of HMGB1 in the repair of DNA adducts and the responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells

High mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) is a multifunctional protein with roles in chromatin structure, transcription, V(D)J recombination, and inflammation. HMGB1 also binds to and bends damaged DNA, but the biological consequence of this interaction is not clearly understood. We have shown previously that HMGB1 binds cooperatively with nucleotide excision repair (NER) damage recognition proteins XPA and RPA to triplex-directed psoralen DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). Based on this we hypothesized that HMGB1 is enhancing the repair of DNA lesions, and through this role, is affecting DNA damage-induced mutagenesis and cell survival. Because HMGB1 is also a chromatin protein, we further hypothesized that it is acting to facilitate chromatin remodeling at the site of the DNA damage, to allow access of the repair machinery to the DNA lesion. We demonstrated here that HMGB1 could bind to triplex-directed psoralen ICLs in a complex with NER proteins XPC-RAD23B, XPA and RPA, which occurred in the presence or absence of DNA. Supporting these findings, we demonstrated that HMGB1 enhanced repair of triplex-directed psoralen ICLs (by nucleotide incorporation), as well as removal of UVC irradiation-induced DNA lesions from the genome (by radioimmunoassay). We also explored HMGB1's role in chromatin remodeling upon DNA damage. Immunoblotting demonstrated that, in contrast to HMGB1 proficient cells, cells lacking HMGB1 showed no increase in histone acetylation after UVC irradiation. Additionally, purified HMGB1 protein enhanced chromatin formation in an in vitro chromatin assembly system. However, HMGB1 also has a role in DNA repair in the absence of chromatin, as shown by measuring UVC-induced nucleotide incorporation on a naked substrate. Upon exploration of HMGB1's effect on several cellular outcomes of DNA damage, we found that mammalian cells lacking HMGB1 were hypersensitive to DNA damage induced by psoralen plus UVA irradiation or UVC radiation, showing less survival and increased mutagenesis. These results reveal a new role for HMGB1 in the error-free repair of DNA lesions in a chromosomal context. As strategies targeting HMGB1 are currently in development for treatment of sepsis and rheumatoid arthritis, our findings draw attention to potential adverse side effects of anti-HMGB1 therapy in patients with inflammatory diseases. ^

G -rich oligodeoxyribonucleotides: Triplexes and transcription

Formation of a triple helix resulting from oligonucleotide binding to the DNA double helix offers new possibilities to control gene expression at the transcriptional level. Purine-motif triplexes can be formed under physiological pH. Nevertheless, this formation was inhibited by certain monovalent cations during the association but not during dissociation. Since triplexes are very stable, it was possible to assemble them in the absence of KCl and have them survive throughout the course of an in vitro transcription reaction. As for the design of a better triplex-forming oligonucleotide, 12 nucleotides in length afforded the highest binding affinity. G/T-rich oligonucleotides can be very polymorphic in solution. The conditions for forming purine-motif triplexes, duplexes or G-quartets were determined. Understanding these parameters will be important for the practical use of G-rich oligonucleotides in the development of DNA aptamers where the structure of the oligonucleotide is paramount in dictating its function. Finally, purine-motif triplexes were demonstrated to significantly inhibit gene transcription in vitro. The optimal effect on this process was dependent on the location of triplexes within the promoter, i.e., whether upstream or proximally downstream of the transcription start site. The mechanism for the inhibition of transcription appeared to be interference with initiation through preventing engagement by RNA polymerase. This finding is revolutionary when compared to the conventional model where triplexes inhibit transcription only by occluding binding by trans-acting proteins. Our findings broaden the utility of triplexes and support a strategy for antigene therapy by triplexes. ^

The yeast STM1 protein binds G*G multiplex nucleic acids in vitro and associates with ribosomes in vivo

The formation of triple helical, or triplex DNA has been suggested to occur in several cellular processes such as transcription, replication, and recombination. Our laboratory previously found proteins in HeLa nuclear extracts and in S. cerevisiae whole cell extracts that avidly bound a Purine-motif (Pu) triplex probe in gel shift assays, or EMSA. In order to identify a triplex DNA-binding protein, we used conventional and affinity chromatography to purify the major Pu triplex-binding protein in yeast. Peptide microsequencing and data base searches identified this protein as the product of the STM1 gene. Confirmation that Stm1p is a Pu triplex-binding protein was obtained by EMSA using both recombinant Stm1p and whole cell extracts from stm1Δ yeast. Stm1p had previously been identified as G4p2, a G-quartet DNA- and RNA-binding protein. To study the cellular role and identify the nucleic acid ligand of Stm1p in vivo, we introduced an HA epitope at either the N- or C-terminus of Stm1p and performed immunoprecipitations with the HA.11 mAb. Using peptide microsequencing and Northern analysis, we positively identified a subset of both large and small subunit ribosomal proteins and all four rRNAs as associating with Stm1p. DNase I treatment did not affect the association of Stm1p with ribosomal components, but RNase A treatment abolished the association with all ribosomal proteins and RNA, suggesting this association is RNA-dependent. Sucrose gradient fractionation followed by Western and EMSA analysis confirmed that Stm1p associates with intact 80S monosomes, but not polysomes. The presence of additional, unidentified RNA in the Stm1p-immunoprecipitate, and the absence of tRNAs and elongation factors suggests that Stm1p binds RNA and could be involved in the regulation of translation. Immunofluorescence microscopy data showed Stm1p to be located throughout the cytoplasm, with a specific movement to the bud during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. A dramatically flocculent, large cell phenotype is observed when Stm1p has a C-terminal HA tag in a protease-deficient strain background. When STM1 is deleted in this background, the same phenotype is not observed and the deletion yeast grow very slowly compared to the wild-type. These data suggest that STM1 is not essential, but plays a role in cell growth by interacting with an RNP complex that may contain G*G multiplex RNA. ^