1 resultado para Systems software
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (17)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (60)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital - Universidad Icesi - Colombia (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (8)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (6)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (58)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (19)
- CaltechTHESIS (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (16)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (22)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (6)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (11)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (19)
- Digital Peer Publishing (7)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (8)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (31)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (24)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (10)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Projetos e Dissertações em Sistemas de Informação e Gestão do Conhecimento (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (6)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (44)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (110)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (7)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Almería (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (61)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (4)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (19)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (73)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (19)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (39)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Michigan (14)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (74)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: The most effective decision support systems are integrated with clinical information systems, such as inpatient and outpatient electronic health records (EHRs) and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems. Purpose The goal of this project was to describe and quantify the results of a study of decision support capabilities in Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) certified electronic health record systems. METHODS: The authors conducted a series of interviews with representatives of nine commercially available clinical information systems, evaluating their capabilities against 42 different clinical decision support features. RESULTS: Six of the nine reviewed systems offered all the applicable event-driven, action-oriented, real-time clinical decision support triggers required for initiating clinical decision support interventions. Five of the nine systems could access all the patient-specific data items identified as necessary. Six of the nine systems supported all the intervention types identified as necessary to allow clinical information systems to tailor their interventions based on the severity of the clinical situation and the user's workflow. Only one system supported all the offered choices identified as key to allowing physicians to take action directly from within the alert. Discussion The principal finding relates to system-by-system variability. The best system in our analysis had only a single missing feature (from 42 total) while the worst had eighteen.This dramatic variability in CDS capability among commercially available systems was unexpected and is a cause for concern. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have implications for four distinct constituencies: purchasers of clinical information systems, developers of clinical decision support, vendors of clinical information systems and certification bodies.