HLA-DPB1 and DPB2 are genetic loci for systemic sclerosis: a genome-wide association study in Koreans with replication in North Americans.

OBJECTIVE: To identify systemic sclerosis (SSc) susceptibility loci via a genome-wide association study. METHODS: A genome-wide association study was performed in 137 patients with SSc and 564 controls from Korea using the Affymetrix Human SNP Array 5.0. After fine-mapping studies, the results were replicated in 1,107 SSc patients and 2,747 controls from a US Caucasian population. RESULTS: The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs3128930, rs7763822, rs7764491, rs3117230, and rs3128965) of HLA-DPB1 and DPB2 on chromosome 6 formed a distinctive peak with log P values for association with SSc susceptibility (P=8.16x10(-13)). Subtyping analysis of HLA-DPB1 showed that DPB1*1301 (P=7.61x10(-8)) and DPB1*0901 (P=2.55x10(-5)) were the subtypes most susceptible to SSc in Korean subjects. In US Caucasians, 2 pairs of SNPs, rs7763822/rs7764491 and rs3117230/rs3128965, showed strong association with SSc patients who had either circulating anti-DNA topoisomerase I (P=7.58x10(-17)/4.84x10(-16)) or anticentromere autoantibodies (P=1.12x10(-3)/3.2x10(-5)), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of our genome-wide association study in Korean subjects indicate that the region of HLA-DPB1 and DPB2 contains the loci most susceptible to SSc in a Korean population. The confirmatory studies in US Caucasians indicate that specific SNPs of HLA-DPB1 and/or DPB2 are strongly associated with US Caucasian patients with SSc who are positive for anti-DNA topoisomerase I or anticentromere autoantibodies.

Regulation of the expression of {\it mutS, mutL}, and {\it mutH\/} mismatch repair genes in {\it Escherichia coli\/} K-12

Post-replication DNA mismatch repair plays crucial roles in mutation avoidance and maintenance of chromosome stability in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In humans, deficiency in this repair system leads to a predisposition for certain cancers. The biochemistry of this repair system has been best studied in a model bacterium Escherichia coli. In this thesis, regulation of expression of mutS, mutL and mutH genes, whose products mediate methyl-directed mismatch (MDM) repair in E. coli, is investigated. One-step affinity purification schemes were developed to purify E. coli MutS, MutL and MutH proteins fused to a His-6-affinity tag. His-6-MutS exhibited the same mismatch binding activity and specificity as the native MutS protein. Purified His-6-MutS, -MutL and -MutH proteins were used to develop quantitative Western blotting assays for amounts of MutS, MuL and MutH proteins under various conditions. It was found that the three proteins were present in relatively low amounts in exponentially growing cells and MutS and MutH were diminished in stationary-phase cells. Further studies indicated that the drop in the amounts of MutS and MutH proteins in stationary-phase cells was mediated through RpoS, a key global regulator of stationary-phase transition. In both exponential- and stationary-phase cells, MutS amount was also negatively regulated by the Hfq (HF-I) global regulator, which is required for RpoS translation, through an RpoS-independent mechanism. $\beta$-galactosidase assays of mutS-lacZ operon and gene fusions suggested that hfq regulates mutS posttranscriptionally, and RNase T2 protection assays revealed that Hfq destabilizes mutS transcripts in exponentially growing cells. To study the relation between regulation of MDM repair and mutagenesis, amounts of MutS, MutL and MutH were measured in starved cells undergoing adaptive mutagenesis. It was found that MutS amount dropped drastically, MutH amount dropped slightly, whereas MutL amount remained essentially constant in starved cells. Overexpression of MutL did not reverse the drop in the amounts of MutS or MutH protein. These results ruled out several explanations for a phenomenon in which overexpression of MutL, but not MutS, reversed adaptive mutagenesis. The findings further suggested that functional MutL is limiting during adaptive mutagenesis. The implications of regulation of the MDM repair are discussed in the context of mutagenesis, pathogenesis and tumorigenesis. ^

A FUNCTIONAL VARIANT OF HLA-DR1 DELINEATED BY T-LYMPHOCYTE CLONE REACTIVITY, PROTEIN CONFORMATION, AND GENOMIC RESTRICTION SITES

This research characterized a serologically indistinguishable form of HLA-DR1 that: (1) cannot stimulate some DR1-restricted or specific T-lymphocyte clones; (2) displays an unusual electrophoretic pattern on two dimensional gels; and (3) is marked by a polymorphic restriction site of the alpha gene. Inefficient stimulation of some DR1-restricted clones was a property of DR1$\sp{+}$ cells that shared HLA-B14 on the same haplotype and/or were carriers of 21-hydroxylase (21-OH) deficiency. Nonclassical 21-OH deficiency frequently demonstrates genetic linkage with HLA-B14;DR1 haplotypes and associates with duplications of C4B and one 21-OH gene. Cells having both stimulatory (DR1$\sb{\rm n}$) and nonstimulatory (DR1$\sb{\rm x}$) parental haplotypes did not mediate proliferation of these clones. However, heterozygous DR1$\sb{\rm x}$, 2 and DR1$\sb{\rm x}$, 7 cells were efficient stimulators of DR2 and DR7 specific clones, respectively, suggesting that a trans acting factor may modify DR1 alleles or products to yield a dominant DR1$\sb{\rm x}$ phenotype. Incompetent stimulator populations did not secrete an intercellular soluble or contact dependent suppressor factor nor did they express interleukin-2 receptors competing for T-cell growth factors. Two dimensional gel analysis of anti-DR immunoprecipitates revealed, in addition to normal DR$\alpha$ and DR$\beta$ chains, a 50kD species from DR1$\sb{\rm x}$ but not from the majority of DR1$\sb{\rm n}$ or non-DR1 cells. The 50kD structure was stable under reducing conditions in SDS and urea, had antigenic homology with DR, and dissociated after boiling into 34kD and 28kD peptide chains apparently identical with DR$\alpha$ and DR$\beta$ as shown by limited digest peptide maps. N-linked glycosylation and sialation of DRgp50 appeared to be unchanged from normal DR$\alpha$ and DR$\beta$. Bg1II digestion and $DR\alpha$ probing of DR1$\sb{\rm x}$ genomic DNA revealed a 4.5kb fragment while DR1$\sb{\rm n}$ DNA yielded 3.8 and 0.76kb fragments; all restriction sites mapped to the 3$\sp\prime$ untranslated region of $DR\alpha$. Collectively, these data suggest that DRgp50 represents a novel combinatorial association between constitutive chains of DR that may interfere with or compete for normal T cell receptor recognition of DR1 as both an alloantigen and restricting element. Furthermore, extensive chromosomal abnormalities previously mapped to the class III region of B14;DR1 haplotypes may extend into the adjacent class II region with consequent intrusion on immune function. ^

Roles of mismatch repair proteins in the recognition and processing of DNA interstrand crosslinks in human cells

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are among the most toxic type of damage to a cell. Many ICL-inducing agents are widely used as therapeutic agents, e.g. cisplatin, psoralen. A bettor understanding of the cellular mechanism that eliminates ICLs is important for the improvement of human health. However, ICL repair is still poorly understood in mammals. Using a triplex-directed site-specific ICL model, we studied the roles of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in ICL repair in human cells. We are also interested in using psoralen-conjugated triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) to direct ICLs to a specific site in targeted DNA and in the mammalian genomes. ^ MSH2 protein is the common subunit of two MMR recognition complexes, and MutSα and MutSβ. We showed that MSH2 deficiency renders human cell hypersensitive to psoralen ICLs. MMR recognition complexes bind specifically to triplex-directed psoralen ICLs in vitro. Together with the fact that psoralen ICL-induced repair synthesis is dramatically decreased in MSH2 deficient cell extracts, we demonstrated that MSH2 function is critical for the recognition and processing of psoralen ICLs in human cells. Interestingly, lack of MSH2 does not reduce the level of psoralen ICL-induced mutagenesis in human cells, suggesting that MSH2 does not contribute to error-generating repair of psoralen ICLs, and therefore, may represent a novel error-free mechanism for repairing ICLs. We also studied the role of MLH1, anther key protein in MMR, in the processing of psoralen ICLs. MLH1-deficient human cells are more resistant to psoralen plus UVA treatment. Importantly, MLH1 function is not required for the mutagenic repair of psoralen ICLs, suggesting that it is not involved in the error-generating repair of this type of DNA damage in human cells. ^ These are the first data indicating mismatch repair proteins may participate in a relatively error-free mechanism for processing psoralen ICL in human cells. Enhancement of MMR protein function relative to nucleotide excision repair proteins may reduce the mutagenesis caused by DNA ICLs in humans. ^ In order to specifically target ICLs to mammalian genes, we identified novel TFO target sequences in mouse and human genomes. Using this information, many critical mammalian genes can now be targeted by TFOs.^

Mismatch Repair Deficient Tumors Lacking Known Sporadic Causes: Are They All Due to Lynch Syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair deficient (MMRD) colorectal (CRC) or endometrial (EC) cancers in the absence of MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and BRAF mutations are suggestive of Lynch syndrome (LS). Positive germline genetic test results confirm LS. It is unclear if individuals with MMRD tumors but no identified germline mutation or sporadic cause (MMRD+/germline-) have LS. HYPOTHESIS: Since LS is hereditary, individuals with LS should have a stronger family history of LS-related cancers than individuals with sporadic tumors. We hypothesized that MMRD+/germline- CRC and/or EC patients would have less suggestive family histories than LS CRC and/or EC patients. METHODS: 253 individuals with an MMRD CRC or EC who underwent genetic counseling at one institution were included in analysis in 1 of 4 groups: LS, MMRD+/germline-, MMRD+/VUS, sporadic MSI-H (MMRD tumor with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation or BRAF mutation). Family histories were analyzed utilizing MMRpro and PREMM1,2,6. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare family history scores. Logistic regression was used to determine what factors were predictive of LS. RESULTS: MMRD+/germline- individuals had significantly lower median family history scores (PREMM1,2,6=7.3, MMRpro=8.1) than LS individuals (PREMM1,2,6=26.1, MMRpro=89.8, p CONCLUSION: MMRD+/germline- individuals have less suggestive family histories of LS than individuals with LS, but more suggestive family histories than sporadic MSI-H individuals. CRC and/or EC patients with abnormal tumor studies are more likely to have a germline LS mutation if they have a family history suggestive of hereditary cancer. These results imply that the MMRD+/germline- group may not all have LS. This finding highlights the need to determine other somatic, epigenetic or germline causes of MMRD tumors so that these patients and their families can be accurately counseled regarding screening and management.