Evaluation of web-based resources for pregnant and parenting teens

Current teen pregnancy and repeat pregnancy rates reveal that there is a pressing need for comprehensive care for pregnant and parenting teens to address their unique needs. The Internet has become a source of various types of information and as a result, several efforts have begun to assess the quality of health information provided on websites. The objective of this study was to assess the functionality and quality of websites containing health information and resources for pregnant and parenting teens. The three most widely used search engines currently: Google, MSN, and Yahoo were searched using three general search terms “teen pregnancy”, “pregnant teen”, and “teen parent”. The first 5 pages of each search were reviewed and categorized to yield 12 websites which met inclusion criteria for content evaluation. The 12 websites were rated using a pre-existing instrument encompassing two domains: functionality and content analysis. Within the functionality domain, this sample highlighted the need to improve accessibility and credibility for the target population. The content analysis revealed that among the topics which are recommended for pregnant and parenting teens, the topics most commonly covered were mental health and primary and preventive health care. The majority of websites neglected sexual health topics including STI’s and family planning. This study provides the first glimpse into health information and resources for pregnant and parenting teens on the Internet. Researchers, health care providers, social workers, health educators, and website sponsors can use these results to maintain and recommend websites which offer easily accessible, accurate, and practical information for pregnant and parenting teens.^

Association of ALLHAT investigator characteristics with participant recruitment

Clinical trials are often not successful because of the inability to recruit a sufficient number of patients. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), the largest antihypertensive trial ever conducted, provided highly generalized results and successful recruitment of over 42,000 participants. The overall purpose of this study was to examine the association of investigator characteristics with anti-hypertensive (AHT) participant recruitment in ALLHAT. This secondary data analyses collected data from the ALLHAT investigator profile survey and related investigator characteristics to recruitment success. The sample size was 502 investigators, with recruitment data from 37,947AHT participants. Recruitment was dichotomized by categorizing all sites with recruitment numbers at or above the overall median recruitment number of 46 as "Successful Recruitment". Frequency distributions and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were conducted. When adjusting for all other factors, Hispanic ethnicity, suburban setting, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMC) site type, number of clinical site staff working on the trial, study coordinator hours per week, medical conference sessions attended, the investigator's primary goal and the likelihood that a physician will convince a patient to continue on randomized treatment, have significant impacts on the recruitment success of ALLHAT investigators. Most of the ALLHAT investigators described their primary commitment as being towards their patients and not to scientific knowledge alone. However, investigators that distinguished themselves as leaders in research had greater recruitment success than investigators who were leaders in clinical practice. ALLHAT was a highly successful trial that proved that community based cardiovascular trials can be implemented on a large scale. Exploring characteristics of ALLHAT investigators provides data that can be generalized to sponsors, sites, and others interested in maximizing clinical trial recruitment numbers. Future studies should further evaluate investigator and study coordinator factors that impact cardiovascular clinical trial recruitment success.^