Change Detection Memory in Rhesus Monkeys and Humans

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) is the storage of visual information over a brief time period (usually a few seconds or less). Over the past decade, the most popular task for studying VSTM in humans has been the change detection task. In this task, subjects must remember several visual items per trial in order to identify a change following a brief delay interval. Results from change detection tasks have shown that VSTM is limited; humans are only able to accurately hold a few visual items in mind over a brief delay. However, there has been much debate in regard to the structure or cause of these limitations. The two most popular conceptualizations of VSTM limitations in recent years have been the fixed-capacity model and the continuous-resource model. The fixed-capacity model proposes a discrete limit on the total number of visual items that can be stored in VSTM. The continuous-resource model proposes a continuous-resource that can be allocated among many visual items in VSTM, with noise in item memory increasing as the number of items to be remembered increases. While VSTM is far from being completely understood in humans, even less is known about VSTM in non-human animals, including the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Given that rhesus monkeys are the premier medical model for humans, it is important to understand their VSTM if they are to contribute to understanding human memory. The primary goals of this study were to train and test rhesus monkeys and humans in change detection in order to directly compare VSTM between the two species and explore the possibility that direct species comparison might shed light on the fixed-capacity vs. continuous-resource models of VSTM. The comparative results suggest qualitatively similar VSTM for the two species through converging evidence supporting the continuous-resource model and thereby establish rhesus monkeys as a good system for exploring neurophysiological correlates of VSTM.

Glutamate iontophoresis induces long-term potentiation in the absence of evoked presynaptic activity

$\rm\underline{L}$ong-$\rm\underline{t}$erm $\rm\underline{p}$otentiation (LTP) is a candidate cellular mechanism underlying mammalian learning and memory. Protocols that induce LTP typically involve afferent stimulation. The experiments described in this dissertation tested the hypothesis that LTP induction does not require presynaptic activity. The significance of this hypothesis is underscored by results suggesting that LTP expression may involve activity-dependent presynaptic changes. An induction protocol using glutamate iontophoresis was developed that reliably induces LTP in hippocampal slices without afferent stimulation (ionto-LTP). Ionto-LTP is induced when excitatory postsynaptic potentials are completely blocked with adenosine and $\rm\underline{t}$etrodo$\rm\underline{t}$o$\rm\underline{x}$in (TTX). These results suggest constraints on the involvement of presynaptic mechanisms and putative retrograde messengers in LTP induction and expression; namely, these processes must function without many forms of activity-dependent presynaptic processes.^ In testing the role of pre-and postsynaptic mechanisms in LTP expression whole-cell recordings were used to examine the frequency and amplitude of $\rm\underline{s}$pontaneous $\rm\underline{e}$xcitatory $\rm\underline{p}$o$\rm\underline{s}$ynaptic $\rm\underline{c}$urrents (sEPSCs) in CA1 pyramidal neurons. sEPSCs where comprised of an equal mixture of TTX insensitive miniature EPSCs and sEPSCs that appeared to result from spontaneous action potentials (i.e., TTX sensitive EPSCs). The detection of all sEPSCs was virtually eliminated by CNQX, suggesting that sEPSCs were glutamate mediated synaptic events. Changes in the amplitude and frequency sEPSCs were examined during the expression of ionto-LTP to obtain new information about the cellular location of mechanisms involved in synaptic plasticity. The findings of this dissertation show that ionto-LTP expression results from increased sEPSC amplitude in the absence of lasting increases in sEPSC frequency. Potentiation of sEPSC amplitude without changes in sEPSC frequency has been previously interpreted to be due to postsynaptic mechanisms. Although this interpretation is supported by findings from peripheral synapses, its application to the central nervous system is unclear. Therefore, alternative mechanisms are also considered in this dissertation. Models based on increased release probability for action potential dependent transmitter release appear insufficient to explain our results. The most straightforward interpretation of the results in this dissertation is that LTP induced by glutamate iontophoresis on dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons is mediated by postsynaptic mechanisms. ^