Effects of a dog walking program with older adults in long-term care

The purpose of this study was to determine if walking a dog would increase motivation to adhere to a walking program and result in an increase in walking endurance and mobility among institutionalized elderly. An experimental pre and post test two group randomly assigned study design was utilized. Thirty subjects, 20 females and 10 males with an average age of 72, were enrolled from three long-term care facilities. The walking program was 3 times a week for 6 weeks. The experimental group walked with a certified therapy dog and the handler. The control group walked with only the handler. The Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale (OEES) was used to measure the perceived benefits of exercise. The 2-minute walk test and the 30 second chair stand test were administered before and after the walking program. The OEES scores did not significantly predict adherence to the program. The pre- and post-chair stand test and the 2-minute walk test did not show statistical significant differences between groups. All of the participants did show an increase (7 minutes) in walking time during the 6 week period (p=0.048). The mean pre and post walk test scores for participants with stroke/arthritis were significantly less than those without stroke/arthritis (p=0.013). The experimental group had 12 subjects with stroke/arthritis compared with 6 in the control group. The walk test means in feet walked were 362.44 ± 130.36 (control) vs. 201.27 ± 106.25 (experimental), p=0.001. The results indicate walking practice has the potential to increase walking time and endurance. Because residents of long-term care facilities were not allowed outside the facilities without accompaniment, the presence of the dog handler was key to their walking. Analysis of conversations during the walks indicated that for participants who walked with dogs, the dogs did serve as motivation for continuing in the program. ^

Multiple retinal detachment surgery: A functional outcome study. The Houston Vision Assessment Test-Retina (HVAT-Retina)

Retinal detachment is a common ophthalmologic procedure, and outcome is typically measured by a single factor-improvement in visual acuity. Health related functional outcome testing, which quantifies patient's self-reported perception of impairment, can be integrated with objective clinical findings. Based on the patient's self-assessed lifestyle impairment, the physician and patient together can make an informed decision on the treatment that is most likely to benefit the patient. ^ A functional outcome test (the Houston Vision Assessment Test-Retina; HVAT-Retina) was developed and validated in patients with multiple retinal detachments in the same eye. The HVAT-Retina divides an estimated total impairment into subcomponents: contribution of visual disability (potentially correctable by retinal detachment surgery) and nonvisual physical disabilities (co-morbidities not affected by retinal detachment surgery. ^ Seventy-six patients participated in this prospective multicenter study. Seven patients were excluded from the analysis because they were not certain of their answers. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.91 for presurgery HVAT-Retina and 0.94 post-surgery. The item-to-total correlation ranged from 0.50 to 0.88. Visual impairment score improved by 9 points from pre-surgery (p = 0.0003). Physical impairment score also improved from pre-surgery (p = 0.0002). ^ In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that the instrument is reliable and valid in patients presenting with recurrent retinal detachments. The HVAT-Retina is a simple instrument and does not burden the patient or the health professional in terms of time or cost. It may be self-administrated, not requiring an interviewer. Because the HVAT-Retina was designed to demonstrate outcomes perceivable by the patient, it has the potential to guide the decision making process between patient and physician. ^