Estimates of hospital and physician costs of epilepsy in the United States for 1995 comparing the provider -based survey method and a patient -based medical charts and billing method

This investigation compares two different methodologies for calculating the national cost of epilepsy: provider-based survey method (PBSM) and the patient-based medical charts and billing method (PBMC&BM). The PBSM uses the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) as the sources of utilization. The PBMC&BM uses patient data, charts and billings, to determine utilization rates for specific components of hospital, physician and drug prescriptions. ^ The 1995 hospital and physician cost of epilepsy is estimated to be $722 million using the PBSM and $1,058 million using the PBMC&BM. The difference of $336 million results from $136 million difference in utilization and $200 million difference in unit cost. ^ Utilization. The utilization difference of $136 million is composed of an inpatient variation of $129 million, $100 million hospital and $29 million physician, and an ambulatory variation of $7 million. The $100 million hospital variance is attributed to inclusion of febrile seizures in the PBSM, $−79 million, and the exclusion of admissions attributed to epilepsy, $179 million. The former suggests that the diagnostic codes used in the NHDS may not properly match the current definition of epilepsy as used in the PBMC&BM. The latter suggests NHDS errors in the attribution of an admission to the principal diagnosis. ^ The $29 million variance in inpatient physician utilization is the result of different per-day-of-care physician visit rates, 1.3 for the PBMC&BM versus 1.0 for the PBSM. The absence of visit frequency measures in the NHDS affects the internal validity of the PBSM estimate and requires the investigator to make conservative assumptions. ^ The remaining ambulatory resource utilization variance is $7 million. Of this amount, $22 million is the result of an underestimate of ancillaries in the NHAMCS and NAMCS extrapolations using the patient visit weight. ^ Unit cost. The resource cost variation is $200 million, inpatient is $22 million and ambulatory is $178 million. The inpatient variation of $22 million is composed of $19 million in hospital per day rates, due to a higher cost per day in the PBMC&BM, and $3 million in physician visit rates, due to a higher cost per visit in the PBMC&BM. ^ The ambulatory cost variance is $178 million, composed of higher per-physician-visit costs of $97 million and higher per-ancillary costs of $81 million. Both are attributed to the PBMC&BM's precise identification of resource utilization that permits accurate valuation. ^ Conclusion. Both methods have specific limitations. The PBSM strengths are its sample designs that lead to nationally representative estimates and permit statistical point and confidence interval estimation for the nation for certain variables under investigation. However, the findings of this investigation suggest the internal validity of the estimates derived is questionable and important additional information required to precisely estimate the cost of an illness is absent. ^ The PBMC&BM is a superior method in identifying resources utilized in the physician encounter with the patient permitting more accurate valuation. However, the PBMC&BM does not have the statistical reliability of the PBSM; it relies on synthesized national prevalence estimates to extrapolate a national cost estimate. While precision is important, the ability to generalize to the nation may be limited due to the small number of patients that are followed. ^

Current Resources

Reviews of: Evaluating Family-Based Services Peter J. Pecora et al. 1995 The Civil Rights of Homelwss People: Law, Social Policy, and Social Works Practice. Madeleine R. Stoner and Aldine De Gruyter. 1995 From Case Management to Services Coordination for Children with Emotional, Behavioral, or Mental Disorders: Building on Family Strengths. Barbara Friesen & John Poertner (Eds.). Paul H. Brookes. 1995. Pat Sullivan, Director

The high cost of inappropriate empiric treatment of presumed Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 2 million patients annually acquire an infection while hospitalized in U.S. hospitals for other health problems, and that 88,000 die as a direct or indirect result of these infections. Infection with Clostridium difficile is the most important common cause of health care associated infectious diarrhea in industrialized countries. The purpose of this study was to explore the cost of current treatment practice of beginning empiric metronidazole treatment for hospitalized patients with diarrhea prior to identification of an infectious agent. The records of 70 hospitalized patients were retrospectively analyzed to determine the pharmacologic treatment, laboratory testing, and radiographic studies ordered and the median cost for each of these was determined. All patients in the study were tested for C. difficile and concurrently started on empiric metronidazole. The median direct cost for metronidazole was $7.25 per patient (95% CI 5.00, 12.721). The median direct cost for laboratory charges was $468.00 (95% CI 339.26, 552.58) and for radiology the median direct cost was $970.00 (95% CI 738.00, 3406.91). Indirect costs, which are far greater than direct costs, were not studied. At St. Luke's, if every hospitalized patient with diarrhea was empirically treated with metronidazole at a median cost of $7.25, the annual direct cost is estimated to be over $9,000.00 plus uncalculated indirect costs. In the U.S., the estimated annual direct cost may be as much as $21,750,000.00, plus indirect costs. ^ An unexpected and significant finding of this study was the inconsistency in testing and treatment of patients with health care associated diarrhea. A best-practice model for C. difficile testing and treatment was not found in the literature review. In addition to the cost savings gained by not routinely beginning empiric treatment with metronidazole, significant savings and improvement in patient care may result from a more consistent approach to the diagnosis and treatment of all patients with health care associated diarrhea. A decision tree model for C. difficile testing and treatment is proposed, but further research is needed to evaluate the decision arms before a validated best practice model can be proposed. ^