Defining the regions of homology between human chromosome 16p12--13 and mouse chromosomes

In this study, the evolutionary relationship between human chromosome 16p12-p13 and mouse chromosomes was investigated by determining the order of marker loci in the region and then identifying the chromosomal locations of the homologous loci in mice. Eighteen genes from human 16 were mapped to fifteen subchromosomal regions by a variety of mapping approaches.^ Thirteen of the genes were mapped in the mouse. Linkage analysis with backcross mice and segregation analysis in a mouse - Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) somatic cell hybrid panel informative for different regions of mouse genome were used. The results assigned the thirteen genes to three different mouse chromosomes.^ A group of six genes on mouse 16 was found to be closely linked to Scid. The order of Myh11 and Mrp remains ambiguous since no recombination was detected in backcross analysis. Their relative position in human is also uncertain since they were shown to be very close to each other. For the other mouse loci, an unambiguous gene order could be determined and was found to be identical to that in human. Therefore, they comprise a new conserved linkage group between the two species. The orientation of the group was inverted relative to the centromeres, i.e. the proximal loci in one species become distal in another. The size of the group was estimated to be from 4.4 to 8 Mb and 10 to 32 cM in human. In mouse, it was about 21 cM in the backcross analysis. The two boundaries of the conserved linkage were defined within a 1 Mb range. It is now possible to predict the locations of mouse homologs for some human disease genes based on their locations on human 16p.^ The six human 16p genes that map to MMU7 showed a different gene order in mouse than in human. No recombination was found between Crym and Umod while Crym was distal to D16S79A and proximal to D16S92. The location of Stp and Cdr2 with respect to the above four loci was not determined since they were not mapped in the same set of backcross mice. These genes greatly expanded an existing conserved synteny group between the human 16p12-p13 region and the MMU7. It now consists of eleven loci that span a region of probably more than 10 Mb in human. The gene order derived from this study provided further evidence for chromosomal rearrangements within the conserved synteny. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

Function and regulation of the Pem homeobox gene in vivo

Pem, a member of the PEPP homeobox family, is expressed in somatic cells in male and female reproductive tissues. In the adult murine testis, Pem is specifically expressed in Sertoli cells, where it is restricted to stages IV–VIII of the seminiferous epithelial cycle. To identify Pem's function in Sertoli cells, transgenic mice were generated that express Pem in Sertoli cells during all stages of the seminiferous epithelial cycle. This resulted in an increase in double-strand DNA breaks in preleptotene spermatocytes and single-strand DNA breaks in elongating spermatids. My results suggest that Pem regulates Sertoli-cell genes that encode secreted or cell-surface proteins that serve to control premeiotic DNA replication, DNA repair, and/or chromatin remodeling in the adjacent germ cells. Three additional transgenic mouse containing varying lengths of the Pem male-specific promoter (Pp) were generated to identify the sequences responsible for regulating Pem expression in the testis and epididymis. My analysis suggests that there are at least two regulatory regions in the Pem Pp. In the testis, region II directs androgen-dependent expression specifically in Sertoli cells whereas region I fine-tunes stage-specific expression by acting as a negative regulator. In the epididymis, region II confers androgen-dependent, developmentally-regulated expression in the caput whereas region I prevents inappropriate expression in the corpus. I also report the identification and characterization of two human PEPP family members related to Pem that I have named hPEPP1 and hPEPP2. The hPEPP1 and hPEPP2 homeodomains are more closely related to PEPP subfamily homeodomains than to any other homeodomain subfamily. Both genes are localized to the specific region of the human X chromosome that shares synteny with the region on the murine X chromosome containing three PEPP homeobox genes, Pem, Psx-1, and Psx-2. hPEPP1 and hPEPP2 mRNA expression is restricted to the testis but is aberrantly expressed in tumor cells of different origins, analogous to the expression pattern of Pem but not of Psx-1 or Psx-2. Unlike all known PEPP members, neither hPEPP1 nor hPEPP2 are expressed in placenta, which suggests that the regulation of the PEPP family has undergone significant alteration since the split between hominids and rodents. ^