Characterization of cytochrome P450 4F subfamily: Functional role and response in inflammation

CYP4F subfamily comprises a group of enzymes that metabolize LTB4 to biologically less active metabolites. These inactive hydroxy products are incapable of chemotaxis and recruitment of inflammatory cells. This has led to a hypothesis that CYP4Fs may modulate inflammatory conditions serving as a signal of resolution. ^ We investigated the regulation of rat CYP4F gene expression under various inflammatory prompts including a bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treated model system, controlled traumatic brain injury (TBI) model as well as using direct cytokine challenges. CYP4Fs showed an isoform specific response to LPS. The pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α produced an overall inductive CYP4F response whereas IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, suppressed CYP4F gene expression in primary hepatocytes. The molecular mechanism behind IL-6 mediated CYP4F induction was partially STAT3 dependent. ^ An alternate avenue of triggering the inflammatory cascade is TBI, which is known to cause several secondary effects leading to multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. The results from this study elicited that trauma to the brain can produce acute inflammatory changes in organs distant from the injury site. Local production of LTB4 after CNS injury caused mobilization of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils to the lung. In the resolution phase, CYP4F expression increased with time along with the associated activity causing a decline in LTB4 concentration. This marked a significant reduction in neutrophil recruitment to the lung which led to subsequent recovery and repair. In addition, we showed that CYP4Fs are localized primarily in pulmonary endothelium. We speculate that the temporally regulated LTB4 clearance in the endothelium may be a novel target for treatment of pulmonary inflammation following injury. ^ In humans, several CYP4F isoforms have been identified and shown to metabolize LTB4 and other endogenous eicosanoids. However, the specific activity of the recently cloned human CYP4F11 is unknown. In the final part of this thesis, CYP4F11 protein was expressed in yeast in parallel to CYP4F3A. To our surprise, CYP4F11 displayed a different substrate profile than CYP4F3A. CYP4F3A metabolized eicosanoids while CYP4F11 was a better catalyst for therapeutic drugs. Thus, besides their endogenous function in clearing inflammation, CYP4Fs also may play a part in drug metabolism. ^

Chimpanzee: A predictive model for the human cytochrome P450 3A subfamily

The human cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) subfamily is responsible for most of the metabolism of therapeutic drugs; however, an adequate in vivo model has yet to be discovered. This study begins with an investigation of a controversial topic surrounding the human CYP3As--estrogen regulation. A novel approach to this topic was used by defining expression in the estrogen-responsive endometrium. This study shows that estrogen down-regulates CYP3A4 expression in the endometrium. On the other hand, analogous studies showed an increase in CYP3A expression as age increases in liver tissue. Following the discussion of estrogen regulation, is an investigation of the cross-species relationships among all of the CYP3As was completed. The study compares isoforms from piscines, avians, rodents, canines, ovines, bovines, and primates. Using the traditional phylogenetic analyses and employing a novel approach using exon and intron lengths, the results show that only another primate could be the best animal model for analysis of the regulation of the expression of the human CYP3As. This analysis also demonstrated that the chimpanzee seems to be the best available human model. Moreover, the study showed the presence and similarities of one additional isoform in the chimpanzee genome that is absent in humans. Based on these results, initial characterization of the chimpanzee CYP3A subfamily was begun. While the human genome contains four isoforms--CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7, and CYP3A43--the chimpanzee genome has five, the four previously mentioned and CYP3A67. Both species express CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP3A43, but humans express CYP3A7 while chimpanzees express CYP3A67. In humans, CYP3A4 is expressed at higher levels than the other isoforms, but some chimpanzee individuals express CYP3A67 at higher levels than CYP3A4. Such a difference is expected to alter significantly the total CYP3A metabolism. On the other hand, any study considering individual isoforms would still constitute a valid method of study for the human CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP3A43 isoforms. ^

Characterization of cytochrome P450 4F subfamily: Response in traumatic brain injury and gene regulation

CYP4F enzymes metabolize endogenous molecules including arachidonic acid, leukotrienes and prostaglandins. The involvement of these eisosanoids in inflammation has led to the hypothesis that CYP4Fs may modulate inflammatory conditions after traumatic brain injury (TBI). In rat, TBI elicited changes in mRNA expression of CYP4Fs as a function of time in the cerebrum region. These changes in CYP4F mRNA levels inversely correlated with the cerebral leukotriene B4 (LTB4) level following injury at the same time points. TBI also resulted in changes in CYP4F protein expression and localization around the injury site, where CYP4F1 and CYP4F6 immunoreactivity increased in surrounding astrocytes and CYP4F4 immunoreactivity shifted from endothelia of cerebral vessels to astrocytes. The study with rat primary astrocytes indicated that pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-1β could affect the transcription of CYP4Fs to a certain degree, whereas the changing pattern in the primary astrocytes appeared to be different from that in the in vivo TBI model.^ In addition, the regulation of CYP4F genes has been an unsolved issue although factors including cytokines and fatty acids appear to affect CYP4Fs expression in multiple models. In this project, HaCaT cells were used as an in vitro cellular model to define signaling pathways involved in the regulation of human CYP4F genes. Retinoic acids inhibited CYP4F11 expression, whereas cytokines TNFα and IL-1β induced transcription of CYP4F11 in HaCaT cells. The induction of CYP4F11 by both cytokines could be blocked by a JNK specific inhibitor, indicating the involvement of the JNK pathway in the up-regulation of CYP4F11. Retinoic acids are known to function in gene regulation through nuclear receptors RARs and RXRs. The RXR agonist LG268 greatly induced transcription of CYP4F11, whereas RAR agonist TTNPB obviously inhibited CYP4F11 transcription, indicating that the down-regulation of CYP4F11 by retinoic acid was mediated by RARs, and that inhibition of CYP4F11 by retinoic acid may also be related to the competition for RXR receptors. Thus, the CYP4F11 gene is regulated by signaling pathways including the RXR pathway and the JNK pathway. In contrast, the regulation mechanism of other CYP4Fs by retinoic acids appears to be different from that of CYP4F11.^

CELLULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL FUNCTIONS OF THE XENOPUS ARVCF-CATENIN:KAZRIN COMPLEX

Xenopus ARVCF (xARVCF), a member of p120-catenin subfamily, binds cadherin cytoplasmic domains to enhance cadherin metabolic stability, or when dissociated, modulates Rho-family GTPases. We previously found that xARVCF binds directly to Xenopus KazrinA (xKazrinA), a widely expressed, conserved protein that bears little homology to established protein families. xKazrinA is also known to influence keratinocyte proliferation-differentiation and cytoskeletal activity. In my study, I first evaluated the expression pattern of endogenous Kazrin RNA and protein in Xenopus embryogenesis as well as in adult tissues. We then collaboratively predicted the helical structure of Kazrin’s coiled-coil domain, and I obtained evidence of Kazrin’s dimerization/oligomerization. In considering the intracellular localization of the xARVCF-catenin:xKazrin complex, I did not resolve xKazrinA in a larger ternary complex with cadherin, nor did I detect its co-precipitation with core desmosomal components. Instead, screening revealed that xKazrinA binds spectrin. This suggested a potential means by which xKazrinA localizes to cell-cell junctions, and indeed, biochemical assays confirmed a ternary xARVCF:xKazrinA:xβ2-spectrin complex. Functionally, I demonstrated that xKazrin stabilizes cadherins by negatively modulating the RhoA small-GTPase. I further revealed that xKazrinA binds to p190B RhoGAP (an inhibitor of RhoA), and enhances p190B’s association with xARVCF. Supporting their functional interaction in vivo, Xenopus embryos depleted of xKazrin exhibited ectodermal shedding, a phenotype that could be rescued with exogenous xARVCF. Cell shedding appeared to be caused by RhoA activation, which consequently altered actin organization and cadherin function. Indeed, I was capable of rescuing Kazrin depletion with ectopic expression of p190B RhoGAP. In addition, I obtained evidence that xARVCF and xKazrin participate in craniofacial development, with effects observed upon the neural crest. Finally, I found that xKazrinA associates further with delta-catenin and p0071-catenin, but not with p120-catenin, suggesting that Kazrin interacts selectively with additional members of the p120-catenin sub-family. Taken together, my study supports Kazrin’s essential role in development, and reveals KazrinA’s biochemical and functional association with ARVCF-catenin, spectrin and p190B RhoGAP.

Biological diversity of prokaryotic type IV secretion systems.

Type IV secretion systems (T4SS) translocate DNA and protein substrates across prokaryotic cell envelopes generally by a mechanism requiring direct contact with a target cell. Three types of T4SS have been described: (i) conjugation systems, operationally defined as machines that translocate DNA substrates intercellularly by a contact-dependent process; (ii) effector translocator systems, functioning to deliver proteins or other macromolecules to eukaryotic target cells; and (iii) DNA release/uptake systems, which translocate DNA to or from the extracellular milieu. Studies of a few paradigmatic systems, notably the conjugation systems of plasmids F, R388, RP4, and pKM101 and the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/VirD4 system, have supplied important insights into the structure, function, and mechanism of action of type IV secretion machines. Information on these systems is updated, with emphasis on recent exciting structural advances. An underappreciated feature of T4SS, most notably of the conjugation subfamily, is that they are widely distributed among many species of gram-negative and -positive bacteria, wall-less bacteria, and the Archaea. Conjugation-mediated lateral gene transfer has shaped the genomes of most if not all prokaryotes over evolutionary time and also contributed in the short term to the dissemination of antibiotic resistance and other virulence traits among medically important pathogens. How have these machines adapted to function across envelopes of distantly related microorganisms? A survey of T4SS functioning in phylogenetically diverse species highlights the biological complexity of these translocation systems and identifies common mechanistic themes as well as novel adaptations for specialized purposes relating to the modulation of the donor-target cell interaction.

Biological diversity of prokaryotic type IV secretion systems.

Type IV secretion systems (T4SS) translocate DNA and protein substrates across prokaryotic cell envelopes generally by a mechanism requiring direct contact with a target cell. Three types of T4SS have been described: (i) conjugation systems, operationally defined as machines that translocate DNA substrates intercellularly by a contact-dependent process; (ii) effector translocator systems, functioning to deliver proteins or other macromolecules to eukaryotic target cells; and (iii) DNA release/uptake systems, which translocate DNA to or from the extracellular milieu. Studies of a few paradigmatic systems, notably the conjugation systems of plasmids F, R388, RP4, and pKM101 and the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/VirD4 system, have supplied important insights into the structure, function, and mechanism of action of type IV secretion machines. Information on these systems is updated, with emphasis on recent exciting structural advances. An underappreciated feature of T4SS, most notably of the conjugation subfamily, is that they are widely distributed among many species of gram-negative and -positive bacteria, wall-less bacteria, and the Archaea. Conjugation-mediated lateral gene transfer has shaped the genomes of most if not all prokaryotes over evolutionary time and also contributed in the short term to the dissemination of antibiotic resistance and other virulence traits among medically important pathogens. How have these machines adapted to function across envelopes of distantly related microorganisms? A survey of T4SS functioning in phylogenetically diverse species highlights the biological complexity of these translocation systems and identifies common mechanistic themes as well as novel adaptations for specialized purposes relating to the modulation of the donor-target cell interaction.

Cryo-electron tomography of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus capsids reveals dynamic scaffolding structures essential to capsid assembly and maturation.

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is a recently discovered DNA tumor virus that belongs to the gamma-herpesvirus subfamily. Though numerous studies on KSHV and other herpesviruses, in general, have revealed much about their multilayered organization and capsid structure, the herpesvirus capsid assembly and maturation pathway remains poorly understood. Structural variability or irregularity of the capsid internal scaffolding core and the lack of adequate tools to study such structures have presented major hurdles to earlier investigations employing more traditional cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) single particle reconstruction. In this study, we used cryo-electron tomography (cryoET) to obtain 3D reconstructions of individual KSHV capsids, allowing direct visualization of the capsid internal structures and systematic comparison of the scaffolding cores for the first time. We show that B-capsids are not a structurally homogenous group; rather, they represent an ensemble of "B-capsid-like" particles whose inner scaffolding is highly variable, possibly representing different intermediates existing during the KSHV capsid assembly and maturation. This information, taken together with previous observations, has allowed us to propose a detailed pathway of herpesvirus capsid assembly and maturation.

Dissecting the Interaction between p53 and TRIM24

Dissecting the Interaction of p53 and TRIM24 Aundrietta DeVan Duncan Supervisory Professor, Michelle Barton, Ph.D. p53, the “guardian of the genome”, plays an important role in multiple biological processes including cell cycle, angiogenesis, DNA repair and apoptosis. Because it is mutated in over 50% of cancers, p53 has been widely studied in established cancer cell lines. However, little is known about the function of p53 in a normal cell. We focused on characterizing p53 in normal cells and during differentiation. Our lab recently identified a novel binding partner of p53, Tripartite Motif 24 protein (TRIM24). TRIM24 is a member of the TRIM family of proteins, defined by their conserved RING, B-box, and coiled coil domains. Specifically, TRIM24 is a member of the TIF1 subfamily, which is characterized by PHD and Bromo domains in the C-terminus. Between the Coiled-coil and PHD domain is a linker region, 437 amino acids in length. This linker region houses important functions of TRIM24 including it’s site of interaction with nuclear receptors. TRIM24 is an E3-ubiquitin ligase, recently discovered to negatively regulate p53 by targeting it for degradation. Though it is known that Trim24 and p53 interact, it is not known if the interaction is direct and what effect this interaction has on the function of TRIM24 and p53. My study aims to elucidate the specific interaction domains of p53 and TRIM24. To determine the specific domains of p53 required for interaction with TRIM24, we performed co-immuoprecipitation (Co-IP) with recombinant full-length Flag-tagged TRIM24 protein and various deletion constructs of in vitro translated GST-p53, as well as the reverse. I found that TRIM24 binds both the carboxy terminus and DNA binding domain of p53. Furthermore, my results show that binding is altered when post-translational modifications of p53 are present, suggesting that the interaction between p53 and TRIM24 may be affected by these post-translational modifications. To determine the specific domains of TRIM24 required for p53 interaction, we performed GST pull-downs with in vitro translated, Flag-TRIM24 protein constructs and recombinant GST-p53 protein purified from E. coli. We found that the Linker region is sufficient for interaction of p53 and TRIM24. Taken together, these data indicate that the interaction between p53 and TRIM24 does occur in vitro and that interaction may be influenced by post-translational modifications of the proteins.

Cytochrome P450 4F isoforms in different species: Identification, gene regulation and putative roles in inflammation

The cytochrome P450 4F subfamily comprises a group of enzymes that metabolize derivatives of arachidonic acid such as prostaglandins, lipoxins leukotrienes and hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids, which are important mediators involved in the inflammatory response. Therefore, we speculate that CYP4Fs might be able to modulate the extent of the inflammation by controlling of the tissue levels of these inflammatory mediators, especially, leukotriene B4. One way to provide support for this hypothesis is to test whether the expression of CYP4Fs changes under inflammatory conditions, since these changes are required to adjust the levels of inflammatory mediators. ^ A lipopolysacchride (LPS) induced rat inflammation model was used to analyze the expressions of rat CYP4F4 and CYP4F5 in liver and kidney. LPS administration did not change the constitutive expression level of CYP4F4 and CYP4F5. In liver, the expressions of CYP4F4 and CYP4F5 decreased to 50–60% of the untreated level. The same effect of LPS on CYP4F4 and CYP4F5 expression can be mimicked in hepatocyte primary cultures treated with LPS, indicating a direct of effect of LPS on hepatocytes. LPS treatment also decreased the activity of liver microsomes towards chlorpromazine, however, antibody inhibition study revealed that liver CYP4Fs are not the only players in metabolizing chlorpromazine. To study further the underlying mechanism, CYP4F5 gene was isolated, characterized, and the promoter region was defined. ^ Accumulating evidence showed that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) play an active role in inflammation. To investigate the possible role of PPARα in regulating CYP4F expression by inflammation or by clofibrate treatment, the expressions of two new mouse 4F isoforms were analyzed in PPARα knockout mice upon LPS or clofibrate challenge. A novel induction of CYP4F15 by LPS and clofibrate was observed in kidney, and this effect is totally dependent on the presence of PPARα. Renal CYP4F16 expression was not affected by LPS or clofibrate in both (+/+) and (−/−) mice. In contrast, hepatic expressions of CYP4F15 and CYP4F16 were reduced significantly in (+/+) mice, but much less in (−/−) mice, suggesting that PPARα is partially responsible for this down-regulation. Clofibrate treatment reduced the expression of CYP4F16 in liver, but has no effect on CYP4F15 and PPARα does not have a role in hepatic CYP4F expression regulated by clofibrate. In general, CYP4Fs are regulated in an isoform-, tissue- and species-specific manner. ^ A human CYP4F isoform, CYP4F11, was isolated. The genomic structure was also solved by using database mining and bioinformatics tools. Localization of CYP4F11 to chromosome 19, 16 kb upstream of CYP4F2, suggests that human CYP4F genes may form a cluster on chromosome 19. This novel human 4F is highly expressed in liver, as well as in kidney, heart and skeletal muscle. Further study of the activity and gene regulation on CYP4F11 will provide us more insights into the physiological functions of CYP4F subfamily. ^

Functional and physical associations of beta1 integrins in the activation of human T lymphocytes

Adhesion involves interactions between cells or cells with extracellular matrix components and is a fundamental process for all multicellular organisms as well as many pathogenic microbes. Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane proteins that function as adhesion molecules and transduce signals between the extracellular environment and the intracellular cytoskeletal machinery. β1 integrin subfamily is highly expressed on T lymphocytes and mediates cell spreading, adhesion and coactivation. T lymphocytes have an important role in the regulation and homeostasis of the immune system therefore, the goals of this study were to first to investigate β1 integrin interaction with fibronectin binding protein A (FnbpA), a surface protein expressed on gram-negative bacteria Staphylococcus aureus. Second, characterize the association and function of a non-integrin surface protein, CD98, with β1 integrins on T lymphocytes. ^ FnbpA binds to fibronectin (FN), also a ligand for α5β1 and α4β1 integrins on T lymphocytes. Since both bacterial proteins FnbpA and T cell integrins utilize FN, it was of interest to determine the effects FnbpA on T cell activation. Results demonstrated that recombinant FnbpA (rFnbpA) coimmobilized with OKT3 mediated T cell coactivation in a soluble FN-dependent manner. Integrin α5β1 was identified as the main integrin utilized by Staphylococcus aureus FnbpA from studies using soluble antibodies to inhibit T cell proliferation and parallel plate flow chamber assays. The mechanism of rFnbpA-mediated coactivation was one that used soluble FN as a bridge between rFnbpA and integrin α5β1 on the T lymphocyte. ^ Since integrins are utilized by T lymphocytes and bacterial proteins, it was of interest to identify proteins involved in integrin regulation. Anti-CD98 mAb 80A10 was identified and characterized from a screen to identify surface proteins involved in integrin signaling and functions. CD98 is a non-integrin protein that was sensitive to integrin inhibition in human T lymphocyte aggregation and activation, thus suggested that CD98 shared a common signaling pathway with integrins. These results led to the question of whether CD98 physically associates with β1 integrins. Fluorescence microscopy and biochemical analysis determined that CD98 is specifically associated with β1 integrin on human T lymphocytes and may be part of a larger multimolecular signaling complex. ^

Function and regulation of the Pem homeobox gene in vivo

Pem, a member of the PEPP homeobox family, is expressed in somatic cells in male and female reproductive tissues. In the adult murine testis, Pem is specifically expressed in Sertoli cells, where it is restricted to stages IV–VIII of the seminiferous epithelial cycle. To identify Pem's function in Sertoli cells, transgenic mice were generated that express Pem in Sertoli cells during all stages of the seminiferous epithelial cycle. This resulted in an increase in double-strand DNA breaks in preleptotene spermatocytes and single-strand DNA breaks in elongating spermatids. My results suggest that Pem regulates Sertoli-cell genes that encode secreted or cell-surface proteins that serve to control premeiotic DNA replication, DNA repair, and/or chromatin remodeling in the adjacent germ cells. Three additional transgenic mouse containing varying lengths of the Pem male-specific promoter (Pp) were generated to identify the sequences responsible for regulating Pem expression in the testis and epididymis. My analysis suggests that there are at least two regulatory regions in the Pem Pp. In the testis, region II directs androgen-dependent expression specifically in Sertoli cells whereas region I fine-tunes stage-specific expression by acting as a negative regulator. In the epididymis, region II confers androgen-dependent, developmentally-regulated expression in the caput whereas region I prevents inappropriate expression in the corpus. I also report the identification and characterization of two human PEPP family members related to Pem that I have named hPEPP1 and hPEPP2. The hPEPP1 and hPEPP2 homeodomains are more closely related to PEPP subfamily homeodomains than to any other homeodomain subfamily. Both genes are localized to the specific region of the human X chromosome that shares synteny with the region on the murine X chromosome containing three PEPP homeobox genes, Pem, Psx-1, and Psx-2. hPEPP1 and hPEPP2 mRNA expression is restricted to the testis but is aberrantly expressed in tumor cells of different origins, analogous to the expression pattern of Pem but not of Psx-1 or Psx-2. Unlike all known PEPP members, neither hPEPP1 nor hPEPP2 are expressed in placenta, which suggests that the regulation of the PEPP family has undergone significant alteration since the split between hominids and rodents. ^

A physiological role of cytochromes P450 4Fs: Mouse model

Cytochromes P450 4Fs (CYP4F) are a subfamily of enzymes involved in arachidonic acid metabolism with highest catalytic activity towards leukotriene B 4 (LTB4), a potent chemoattractant involved in prompting inflammation. CYP4F-mediated metabolism of LTB4 leads to inactive ω-hydroxy products incapable of initiating chemotaxis and the inflammatory stimuli that result in the influx of inflammatory cells. Our hypothesis is based on the catalytic ability of CYP4Fs to inactivate pro-inflammatory LTB4 which assures these enzymes a pivotal role in the process of inflammation resolution. ^ To test this hypothesis and evaluate the changes in CYP4F expression under complex inflammatory conditions, we designed two mouse models, one challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as a sterile model of sepsis and the other challenged with a systemic live bacterial infection of Citrobacter rodentium, an equivalent of the human enterobacterium E. coli pathogen invasion. Based on the evidence that Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors (PPARs) play an active role in inflammation regulation, we also examined PPARs as a regulation mechanism in CYP4F expression during inflammation using PPARα knockout mice under LPS challenge. Using the Citrobacter rodentium model of inflammation, we studied CYP4F levels to compare them to those in LPS challenged animals. LPS-triggered inflammation signal is mediated by Toll-like 4 (TLR4) receptors which specifically respond to LPS in association with several other proteins. Using TLR4 knockout mice challenged with Citrobacter rodentium we addressed possible mediation of CYP4F expression regulation via these receptors. ^ Our results show isoform- and tissue-specific CYP4F expression in all the tissues examined. The Citrobacter rodentium inflammation model revealed significant reduction in liver expression of CYP4F14 and CYP4F15 and an up-regulation of gene expression of CYP4F16 and CYP4F18. TLR4 knockout studies showed that the decrease in hepatic CYP4F15 expression is TLR4-dependent. CYP4F expression in kidney shows down-regulation of CYP4F14 and CYP4F15 and up-regulation of CYP4F18 expression. In the LPS inflammation model, we showed similar patterns of CYP4F changes as in Citrobacter rodentium -infected mice. The renal profile of CYP4Fs in PPARα knockout mice with LPS challenge showed CYP4F15 down-regulation to be PPARα dependent. Our study confirmed tissue- and isoform-specific regulation of CYP4F isoforms in the course of inflammation. ^

p21 activated kinase 5 links multiple GTPase signaling pathways at mitochondria

The p21-activated kinase 5 (PAK5) is a serine/threonine protein kinase associated with the group 2 subfamily of PAKs. Although our understanding about PAK5 is very limited, it is receiving increasing interest due to its tissue specific expression pattern and important signaling properties. PAK5 is highly expressed in brain. Its overexpression induces neurite outgrowth in neuroblastoma cells and promotes survival in fibroblasts. ^ The serine/threonine protein kinase Raf-1 is an essential mediator of Ras-dependent signaling that controls the ERK/MAPK pathway. In contrast to PAK5, Raf-1 has been the subject of intensive investigation. However due to the complexity of its activation mechanism, the biological inputs controlling Raf-1 activation are not fully understood. ^ PAKs 1-3 are the known kinases responsible for phosphorylation of Raf-1 on serine 338, which is a crucial phosphorylation site for Raf-1 activation. However, dominant negative versions of these kinases do not block EGF-induced Raf-1 activation, indicating that other kinases may regulate the phosphorylation of Raf-1 on serine 338. ^ This thesis work was initiated to test whether the group 2 PAKs 4, 5 and 6 are responsible for EGF-induced Raf-1 activation. We found that PAK5, and to a lesser extent PAK4, can activate Raf-1 in cells. Our studies thereafter focused on PAK5. With the progress of our study we found that PAK5 does not significantly stimulate serine 338 phosphorylation of Triton X-100 soluble Raf-1. PAK5, however, constitutively and specifically associates with Raf-1 and targets it to a Triton X-100 insoluble, mitochondrial compartment, where PAK5 phosphorylates serine 338 of Raf-1. We further demonstrated that endogenous PAK5 and Raf-1 colocalize in Hela cells at the mitochondrial outer membrane. In addition, we found that the mitochondria-targeting of PAK5 is determined by its C-terminal kinase domain plus the upstream proximal region, and facilitated by the N-terminal p21 binding domain. We also demonstrated that Rho GTPases Cdc42 and RhoD associate with and regulate the subcellular localization of PAK5. Taken together, this work suggests that the mitochondria-targeting of PAK5 may link Ras and Rho GTPase-mediated signaling pathways, and sheds light on aspects of PAK5 signaling that may be important for regulating neuronal homeostasis. ^

Regulation of two P450 isoforms: CYP2D6 and CYP4F11

Cytochromes P450 catalyze a monooxygenase reaction in which molecular oxygen is split and one oxygen atom is incorporated into the substrate. As a whole, P450 researchers have focused most of their attention on substrate metabolism and relatively little on how these enzymes are regulated. This study will focus on the regulation of two P450 isoforms known as, CYP2D6 and CYP4F11. ^ The human CYP2D gene locus contains two pseudogenes and one functional gene known as CYP2D6. This locus is highly polymorphic and produces several alternatively spliced transcripts from the pseudogene CYP2D7. My objective was to understand the role of SV5-in (splice variant 5), one of several alternative splice variants transcribed from the CYP2D7 pseudogene. My results indicate that SV5-in mRNA causes an increase in CYP2D6 protein levels and suggest that there is a role for SV5-in in regulation of CYP2D6 expression. ^ Second, CYP4F11 is a recently discovered and uncharacterized isoform, derived from the CYP4F subfamily. It metabolizes several clinically relevant drugs (i.e.—erythromycin and benzphetamine) and some endogenous inflammatory mediators (i.e.—LTB4). After evaluation of microarray data, I observed an increase in CYP4F11 mRNA levels from wild-type HCT116 cells compared to p53-null cells. Our objectives were to explore and understand this connection between p53 and CYP4F11. Microarray data were confirmed by Q-PCR, after which this effect was again observed at the protein level via Western blot and again at the promoter level via luciferase assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation. Our results indicate that p53 protein regulates expression of CYP4F11 mRNA and protein through CYP4F11 promoter binding (note that p53 binding to CYP4F11 DNA was not shown to be direct). These results signify a whole new level of regulation of drug metabolizing enzymes by p53. ^ An understanding of CYP4F11 regulation by p53 could help us understand another pathway leading to apoptosis or cell growth arrest. This can aid future drug studies and discover new drug metabolism pathways under the control of a tumor suppressor protein. An understanding of the CYP2D6 regulation pathway could illuminate the role of non-coding RNAs in the P450 field and potentially explain several inter-individual drug response variations observed in clinical medicine that are not yet completely explained by genotyping analysis. ^

Regulation of Net1A subcellular localization by the small GTPase Rac1

Activation of Rho family small G proteins is thought to be a critical event in breast cancer development and metastatic progression. Rho protein activation is stimulated by a family of enzymes known as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (Rho GEFs). The neuroepithelioma transforming gene 1 (Net1) is a Rho GEF specific for the RhoA subfamily that is overexpressed in primary breast tumors and breast cancer cell lines. Net1 isoform expression is also required for migration and invasion of breast cancer cells in vitro. These data indicate that Net1 may be a critical regulator of metastatic progression in breast cancer. Net1 activity is negatively regulated by sequestration in the nucleus, and relocalization of Net1 outside the nucleus is required to stimulate RhoA activation, actin cytoskeletal reorganization, and oncogenic transformation. However, regulatory mechanisms controlling the extranuclear localization of Net1 have not been identified. In this study, we have addressed the regulation of Net1A isoform localization by Rac1. Specifically, co-expression of constitutively active Rac1 with Net1A stimulates the relocalization of Net1A from the nucleus to the plasma membrane in breast cancer cells, and results in Net1A activation. Importantly, Net1A localization is also driven by endogenous Rac1 activity. Net1A relocalizes outside the nucleus in cells spreading on collagen, and when endogenous Rac1 expression was silenced by siRNA, Net1A remained nuclear in spreading cells. These data indicate that Rac1 controls the localization of the Net1A isoform and suggests a physiological role for Net1A in breast cancer cell adhesion and motility.