Chronic exposure to MDMA (Ecstasy) elicits behavioral sensitization in rats but fails to induce cross-sensitization to other psychostimulants.

BACKGROUND: The recreational use of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) among adolescents and young adults has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. While evidence suggests that the long-term consequences of MDMA use include neurodegeneration to serotonergic and, possibly, dopaminergic pathways, little is known about susceptibility, such as behavioral sensitization, to MDMA. METHODS: The objectives of this study were to examine the dose-response characteristics of acute and chronic MDMA administration in rats and to determine whether MDMA elicits behavioral sensitization and whether it cross-sensitizes with amphetamine and methylphenidate. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three MDMA dosage groups (2.5 mg/kg, 5.0 mg/kg, and 10.0 mg/kg) and a saline control group (N = 9/group). All three MDMA groups were treated for six consecutive days, followed by a 5-day washout, and subsequently re-challenged with their respective doses of MDMA (day 13). Rats were then given an additional 25-day washout period, and re-challenged (day 38) with similar MDMA doses as before followed by either 0.6 mg/kg amphetamine or 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate on the next day (day 39). Open-field locomotor activity was recorded using a computerized automated activity monitoring system. RESULTS: Acute injection of 2.5 mg/kg MDMA showed no significant difference in locomotor activity from rats given saline (control group), while animals receiving acute 5.0 mg/kg or 10.0 mg/kg MDMA showed significant increases in locomotor activity. Rats treated chronically with 5.0 mg/kg and 10.0 mg/kg MDMA doses exhibited an augmented response, i.e., behavioral sensitization, on experimental day 13 in at least one locomotor index. On experimental day 38, all three MDMA groups demonstrated sensitization to MDMA in at least one locomotor index. Amphetamine and methylphenidate administration to MDMA-sensitized animals did not elicit any significant change in locomotor activity compared to control animals. CONCLUSION: MDMA sensitized to its own locomotor activating effects but did not elicit any cross-sensitization with amphetamine or methylphenidate.

Suppression by {\it Trypanosoma brucei\/} of anaphylaxis-mediated ion transport in the small intestine of rats

Most tissue-invasive parasitic helminths prime for type 1 hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis during some phase of their life cycles. A prototype in this regard is the nematode Trichinella spiralis. Blood protozoa capable of tissue invasion, such as Trypanosoma brucei, might also be expected to prime for the expression of anaphylaxis. However, this response is usually absent in protozoal infections. The hypothesis tested was that failure of hosts infected with T.brucei to express anaphylaxis is related to this parasite's ability to selectively down-regulate immunoglobulin E (IgE) production, and not to an innate lack of allergenicity on the part of T.brucei-derived antigens. This hypothesis was tested by studying in the intestine of rats, antigen-induced Cl$\sp-$ secretion, which results from a local anaphylactic response mediated by IgE and mucosal mast cells. The Cl$\sp-$ secretory response can be primed either by infection with T.spiralis or by the parenteral administration of antigen. Anaphylaxis-induced Cl$\sp-$ secretion is expressed in vitro, and can be quantified electrophysiologically, as a change in transmural short-circuit current when sensitized intestine is mounted in Ussing chambers and challenged with the sensitizing antigen.^ Rats injected parenterally with trypanosome antigen elicited intestinal anaphylaxis in response to antigenic challenge. In contrast, the intestine of rats infected with T.brucei failed to respond to challenge with trypanosome antigen. Infection with T.brucei also suppressed antigen-induced Cl$\sp-$ secretion in rats sensitized and challenged with various antigens, including T.spiralis antigen. However, T.brucei infection did not inhibit the anaphylactic response in rats concomitantly infected with T.spiralis. Relative to the anaphylactic mediators, T.brucei infection blocked production of IgE in rats parenterally injected with antigen but not in T.spiralis-infected hosts. Also, the mucosal mastocytosis normally associated with trichinosis was unaffected by the trypanosome infection. These results support the conclusion that the failure to express anaphylaxis-mediated Cl$\sp-$ secretion in T.brucei infected rats, is due to this protozoan's ability to inhibit IgE production and not to the lack of allergenicity of trypanosome antigens. ^