Transcriptional upregulation of the p21Cip1 promoter by STAT3 and nuclear ErbB2

Over-expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase ErbB2 is prevalent in approximately 30% of human breast carcinomas and confers Taxol resistance. In breast cancer cells, Taxol induces tubulin polymerization and hyperstable microtubule formation. This in turn prematurely activates Cdc2 kinase allowing early entry into the G2/M phase of the cell cycle resultant in mitotic catastrophe followed by apoptosis. Over-expression of ErbB2 upregulates p21Cip1, which inhibits Cdc2 activation, and leads to Taxol resistance in patients. However, the mechanism of ErbB2-mediated p21 Cip1 upregulation is unclear. Here in this study, we investigated the mechanism of ErbB2 downstream signaling events leading to upregulation. The CDKN1A (p21Cip1) gene promoter contains numerous cis-elements including a Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) Inducable Element (SIE) located at -679 kb. Our studies showed ErbB2 overexpressing cells had increased activated levels of STAT3, and therefore we hypothesized that STAT3 is responsible for the upregulation of the p21Cip1 promoter by ErbB2. EMSA and ChIP assays confirmed the binding of STAT3 to the p21Cip1 promoter and luciferase assays showed higher p21 Cip1 promoter activity in ErbB2 over-expressing transfectants when compared to parental cells, in a STAT3 binding site dependant manner. Additionally, reduced level of STAT3 led to reduced p21Cip1 protein expression and promoter activity indicating that both the STAT3 binding site and STAT3 protein are required for ErbB2-mediated p21Cip1 upregulation. Further investigation of ErbB2 downstream signaling showed increased Src kinase activity in ErbB2 over-expressing cells which was required for ErbB2-mediated STAT3 activation and p21Cip1 increase. Treatment of ErbB2 over-expressing resistant cells with STAT3 inhibitor peptides sensitized the cells to Taxol. In addition to classical signal transduction pathways, I identified a novel ErbB2 mediated regulatory mechanism of p21Cip1. I found that a nuclear ErbB2 and STAT3 complex binds directly to the p21Cip1 promoter offering a non-classical mechanism of p21Cip1 promoter regulation. These data suggest that ErbB2 over-expression can confer Taxol resistance of breast cancer cells by transcriptional upregulation of p21 Cip1 via activation of STAT3 by Src kinase and also by cooperation with nuclear ErbB2. The data suggest a potential clinical mechanism for STAT3 inhibitors in sensitizing ErbB2 over-expressing breast cancers to Taxol. ^

Use of short term test systems for the prediction of the hazard represented by potential chemical carcinogens

It has been hypothesized that results from the short term bioassays will ultimately provide information that will be useful for human health hazard assessment. Although toxicologic test systems have become increasingly refined, to date, no investigator has been able to provide qualitative or quantitative methods which would support the use of short term tests in this capacity.^ Historically, the validity of the short term tests have been assessed using the framework of the epidemiologic/medical screens. In this context, the results of the carcinogen (long term) bioassay is generally used as the standard. However, this approach is widely recognized as being biased and, because it employs qualitative data, cannot be used in the setting of priorities. In contrast, the goal of this research was to address the problem of evaluating the utility of the short term tests for hazard assessment using an alternative method of investigation.^ Chemical carcinogens were selected from the list of carcinogens published by the International Agency for Research on Carcinogens (IARC). Tumorigenicity and mutagenicity data on fifty-two chemicals were obtained from the Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS) and were analyzed using a relative potency approach. The relative potency framework allows for the standardization of data "relative" to a reference compound. To avoid any bias associated with the choice of the reference compound, fourteen different compounds were used.^ The data were evaluated in a format which allowed for a comparison of the ranking of the mutagenic relative potencies of the compounds (as estimated using short term data) vs. the ranking of the tumorigenic relative potencies (as estimated from the chronic bioassays). The results were statistically significant (p $<$.05) for data standardized to thirteen of the fourteen reference compounds. Although this was a preliminary investigation, it offers evidence that the short term test systems may be of utility in ranking the hazards represented by chemicals which may be human carcinogens. ^

Differential Activity of the KRAS Oncogene by Method of Activation: Implications for Signaling and Therapeutic Intervention

Despite having been identified over thirty years ago and definitively established as having a critical role in driving tumor growth and predicting for resistance to therapy, the KRAS oncogene remains a target in cancer for which there is no effective treatment. KRas is activated b y mutations at a few sites, primarily amino acid substitutions at codon 12 which promote a constitutively active state. I have found that different amino acid substitutions at codon 12 can activate different KRas downstream signaling pathways, determine clonogenic growth potential and determine patient response to molecularly targeted therapies. Computer modeling of the KRas structure shows that different amino acids substituted at the codon 12 position influences how KRas interacts with its effecters. In the absence of a direct inhibitor of mutant KRas several agents have recently entered clinical trials alone and in combination directly targeting two of the common downstream effecter pathways of KRas, namely the Mapk pathway and the Akt pathway. These inhibitors were evaluated for efficacy against different KRAS activating mutations. An isogenic panel of colorectal cells with wild type KRas replaced with KRas G12C, G12D, or G12V at the endogenous loci differed in sensitivity to Mek and Akt inhibition. In contrast, screening was performed in a broad panel of lung cell lines alone and no correlation was seen between types of activating KRAS mutation due to concurrent oncogenic lesions. To find a new method to inhibit KRAS driven tumors, siRNA screens were performed in isogenic lines with and without active KRas. The knockdown of CNKSR1 (CNK1) showed selective growth inhibition in cells with an oncogenic KRAS. The deletion of CNK1 reduces expression of mitotic cell cycle proteins and arrests cells with active KRas in the G1 phase of the cell cycle similar to the deletion of an activated KRas regardless of activating substitution. CNK1 has a PH domain responsible for localizing it to membrane lipids making KRas potentially amenable to inhibition with small molecules. The work has identified a series of small molecules capable of binding to this PH domain and inhibiting CNK1 facilitated KRas signaling.