A cellular cleavage pathway for the Moloney murine leukemia virus precursor protein, Pr65$\rm\sp{gag}$: Identification of a new viral protein containing CAp30 and NCp10 sequences

The origin and structure of P55$\sp{\rm gag},$ a gag encoded polyprotein lacking the nucleocapsid protein, NCp10, have been explored. Evidence shows that P55$\sp{\rm gag}$ is formed by non-viral proteolytic cleavage of the Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMuLV)gag precursor protein, Pr65$\sp{\rm gag}.$ P55$\sp{\rm gag}$ is produced in cells infected by a viral protease deletion mutant and by a recombinant murine sarcoma virus known to lack the protease gene, implying that a cellular protease is responsible for the cleavage. Structural and immunological studies show that the protein cleavage site is upstream of the CAp30-NCp10 viral proteolytic junction, implying that P55$\sp{\rm gag}$ lacks the carboxy-terminal residues of CAp30. During the course of studying P55$\sp{\rm gag},$ another protein was discovered, which I named nucleocapsid-related protein(NCRP). NCRP possesses the portion of CAp30 that is lacking in P55$\sp{\rm gag}.$ NCRP possesses antigenic epitopes present in CAp30 and NCp10. NCRP was observed in virus lysates and in nuclear lysates of MoMuLV infected cells; it was not detected in the cytoplasmic fractions of MoMuLV infected cells. Our results indicated that NCRP originates from Pr65$\sp{\rm gag},$ resulting from the same cellular proteolytic cleavage event that produces the viral cellular protein P55$\sp{\rm gag}.$ P55$\sp{\rm gag}$- and NCRP-like proteins also were observed in AKV murine leukemia virus (AKV MuLV) and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infected cells and in their respective virus particles. The site of cleavage that yields P55$\sp{\rm gag}$ and NCRP is within the carboxy terminus of CAp30, likely within a motif highly conserved among mammalian type C retroviruses. This new motif, called the capsid conserved motif (CCM), overlaps a region containing both a possible bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a region homologous with the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein 70-kD protein. This domain, when intact, may act as a nuclear targeting sequence for the gag precursor proteins Pr65$\sp{\rm gag}$ and CAp30. Nuclei of cells infected with MoMuLV were examined for the presence of gag proteins. Both Pr65$\sp{\rm gag}$ and CAp30 were detected in the nuclear fraction of MoMuLV, AKV MuLV and FeLV infected cells. P55$\sp{\rm gag}$ was never detected in the nucleus of MoMuLV, AKV MuLV and FeLV infected cells or in their respective virus particles. I propose that NCRP may be involved in sequestering viral genomic RNA for the purposes of encapsidation and intracellular viral genomic RNA dimerization. ^

A Cell Biological Determination of Integrator Subunit Localization

Uridine-rich small nuclear (U snRNAs), with the exception of the U6 snRNA, are RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcripts. The mechanism of 3’ cleavage of snRNAs has been unknown until recently. This area was greatly advanced when 12 of the Integrator complex subunits (IntS) were purified in 2005 through their interaction with the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the large subunit (RpbI) of RNAPII. Subsequently, our lab performed a genome-wide RNAi screen that identified two more members of the complex that we have termed IntS13 and IntS14. We have determined that IntS9 and 11 mediate the 3’ cleavage of snRNAs, but the exact function of the other subunits remains unknown. However, through the use of a U7 snRNA-GFP reporter and RNAi knockdown of the Integrator subunits in Drosophila S2 cells, we have shown that all subunits are required for the proper processing of snRNAs, albeit to differing degrees. Because snRNA transcription takes place in the nucleus of the cell, it is expected that all of the Integrator subunits would exhibit nuclear localization, but the knowledge of discrete subnuclear localization (i.e. to Cajal bodies) of any of the subunits could provide important clues to the function of that subunit. In this study, we used a cell biological approach to determine the localization of the 14 Integrator subunits. We hypothesized that the majority of the subunits would be nuclear, however, a few would display distinct localization to the Cajal bodies, as this is where snRNA genes are localized and transcribed. The specific aims and results are: 1. To determine the subcellular localization of the 14 Integrator subunits. To accomplish this, mCherry and GFP tagged clones were generated for each of the 14 Drosophila and human Integrator subunits. Confocal microscopy studies revealed that the majority of the subunits were diffuse in the nucleus, however, IntS3 formed discrete subnuclear foci. Surprisingly, two of the subunits, IntS2 and 7 were observed in cytoplasmic foci. 2. To further characterize Integrator subunits with unique subcellular localizations. Colocalization studies with endogenous IntS3 and Cajal body marker, coilin, showed that these two proteins overlap, and from this we concluded that IntS3 localized to Cajal bodies. Additionally, colocalization studies with mCherry-tagged IntS2 and 7 and the P body marker, Dcp1, revealed that these proteins colocalize as well. IntS7, however, is more stable in cytoplasmic foci than Dcp1. It was also shown through RNAi knockdown of Integrator subunits, that the cytoplasmic localization of IntS2 and 7 is dependent on the expression of IntS1 and 11 in S2 cells.

Functional Analysis of Drosophila Integrator Complex in snRNA 3' End Processing

Uridine-rich small nuclear RNAs (U snRNAs) play essential roles in eukaryotic gene expression by facilitating the removal of introns from mRNA precursors and the processing of the replication-dependent histone pre-mRNAs. Formation of the 3’ end of these snRNAs is carried out by a poorly characterized, twelve-membered protein complex named Integrator Complex. In the effort to understand Integrator Complex function in the formation of the snRNA 3’ end, we performed a functional RNAi screen in Drosophila S2 cells to identify protein factors required for snRNA 3’ end formation. This screen was conducted by using a fluorescence-based reporter that elicits GFP expression in response to a deficiency in snRNA processing. Besides scoring the known Integrator subunits, we identified Asunder and CG4785 as additional core members of the Integrator Complex. Additionally, we also found a conserved requirement for Cyclin C and Cdk8 in both fly and human snRNA 3’ end processing. We have further demonstrated that the kinase activity of Cdk8 is critical for snRNA 3’ end processing and is likely to function independent of its well-documented function within the Mediator Cdk8 module. Taken together, this work functionally defines the Drosophila Integrator Complex and demonstrates a novel function for Cyclin C/Cdk8 in snRNA 3’ end formation. This thesis work has also characterized an important functional interaction mediated by a microdomain within Integrator subunit 12 (IntS12) and IntS1 that is required for the activity of the Integrator Complex in processing the snRNA 3’ end. Through the development of a reporter-based functional RNAi-rescue assay in Drosophila S2 cells, we analyzed domains within IntS12 required for snRNA 3’ end formation. This analysis unexpectedly revealed that an N-terminal 30 amino acid region and not the highly conserved central PHD finger domain, is required for snRNA 3’ end cleavage. The IntS12 microdomain (1-45) functions autonomously, and is sufficient to interact and stabilize the putative scaffold protein IntS1. Our findings provide more details of the Integrator Complex for understanding the molecular mechanism of snRNA 3’ end processing. Moreover, these results lay the foundation for future studies of the complex through the identification of a novel functional domain within one subunit and the identification of additional subunits.

Structure-function analysis of human Integrator subunit-4

Structure-function analysis of human Integrator subunit 4 Anupama Sataluri Advisor: Eric. J. Wagner, Ph.D. Uridine-rich small nuclear RNAs (U snRNA) are RNA Polymerase-II (RNAPII) transcripts that are ubiquitously expressed and are known to be essential for gene expression. snRNAs play a key role in mRNA splicing and in histone mRNA expression. Inaccurate snRNA biosynthesis can lead to diseases related to defective splicing and histone mRNA expression. Although the 3′ end formation mechanism and processing machinery of other RNAPII transcripts such as mRNA has been well studied, the mechanism of snRNA 3′ end processing has remained a mystery until the recent discovery of the machinery that mediates this process. In 2005, a complex of 14 subunits (the Integrator complex) associated with RNA Polymerase-II was discovered. The 14subunits were annotated Integrator 1-14 based on their size. The subunits of this complex together were found to facilitate 3′ end processing of snRNA. Identification of the Integrator complex propelled research in the direction of understanding the events of snRNA 3’end processing. Recent studies from our lab confirmed that Integrator subunit (IntS) 9 and 11 together perform the endonucleolytic cleavage of the nascent snRNA 3′ end to generate mature snRNA. However, the role of other members of the Integrator complex remains elusive. Current research in our lab is focused on deciphering the role of each subunit within the Integrator complex This work specifically focuses on elucidating the role of human Integrator subunit 4 (IntS4) and understanding how it facilitates the overall function of the complex. IntS4 has structural similarity with a protein called “Symplekin”, which is part of the mRNA 3’end processing machinery. Symplekin has been thoroughly researched in recent years and structure-function correlation studies in the context of mRNA 3’end processing have reported a scaffold function for Symplekin due to the presence of HEAT repeat motifs in its N-terminus. Based upon the structural similarity between IntS4 and Symplekin, we hypothesized that Integrator subunit 4 may be behaving as a Symplekin-like scaffold molecule that facilitates the interaction between other members of the Integrator Complex. To answer this question, the two important goals of this study were to: 1) identify the region of IntS4, which is important for snRNA 3′ end processing and 2) determine binding partners of IntS4 which promote its function as a scaffold. IntS4 structurally consists of a highly conserved N-terminus with 8 HEAT repeats, followed by a nonconserved C- terminus. A series of siRNA resistant N and C-terminus deletion constructs as well as specific point mutants within its N-terminal HEAT repeats were generated for human IntS4 and, utilizing a snRNA transcriptional readthrough GFP-reporter assay, we tested their ability to rescue misprocessing. This assay revealed a possible scaffold like property of IntS4. To probe IntS4 for interaction partners, we performed co-immunoprecipitation on nuclear extracts of IntS4 expressing stable cell lines and identified IntS3 and IntS5 among other Integrator subunits to be binding partners which facilitate the scaffold like function of hIntS4. These findings have established a critical role for IntS4 in snRNA 3′ end processing, identified that both its N and C termini are essential for its function, and mapped putative interaction domains with other Integrator subunits.

Statistical characterization and development of summary measures of non-normal distributions of nuclear morphometry data from prostate cancer cells for use as prognostic indicators

Nuclear morphometry (NM) uses image analysis to measure features of the cell nucleus which are classified as: bulk properties, shape or form, and DNA distribution. Studies have used these measurements as diagnostic and prognostic indicators of disease with inconclusive results. The distributional properties of these variables have not been systematically investigated although much of the medical data exhibit nonnormal distributions. Measurements are done on several hundred cells per patient so summary measurements reflecting the underlying distribution are needed.^ Distributional characteristics of 34 NM variables from prostate cancer cells were investigated using graphical and analytical techniques. Cells per sample ranged from 52 to 458. A small sample of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), representing non-cancer cells, was used for general comparison with the cancer cells.^ Data transformations such as log, square root and 1/x did not yield normality as measured by the Shapiro-Wilks test for normality. A modulus transformation, used for distributions having abnormal kurtosis values, also did not produce normality.^ Kernel density histograms of the 34 variables exhibited non-normality and 18 variables also exhibited bimodality. A bimodality coefficient was calculated and 3 variables: DNA concentration, shape and elongation, showed the strongest evidence of bimodality and were studied further.^ Two analytical approaches were used to obtain a summary measure for each variable for each patient: cluster analysis to determine significant clusters and a mixture model analysis using a two component model having a Gaussian distribution with equal variances. The mixture component parameters were used to bootstrap the log likelihood ratio to determine the significant number of components, 1 or 2. These summary measures were used as predictors of disease severity in several proportional odds logistic regression models. The disease severity scale had 5 levels and was constructed of 3 components: extracapsulary penetration (ECP), lymph node involvement (LN+) and seminal vesicle involvement (SV+) which represent surrogate measures of prognosis. The summary measures were not strong predictors of disease severity. There was some indication from the mixture model results that there were changes in mean levels and proportions of the components in the lower severity levels. ^

The transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NFkappaB) maintains TRAIL resistance in human pancreatic cancer cells

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL/Apo2L) is a member of the TNF family of cytokines that induces apoptosis in a variety of tumor cells while sparing normal cells. However, many human cancer cell lines display resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis and the mechanisms contributing to resistance remain controversial. Previous studies have demonstrated that the dimeric transcription factor Nuclear Factor kappa B (NFκB) is constitutively active in a majority of human pancreatic cancer cell lines and primary tumors, and although its role in tumor progression remains unclear it has been suggested that NFκB contributes to TRAIL resistance. Based on this, I examined the effects of NFκB inhibitors on TRAIL sensitivity in a panel of nine pancreatic cancer cell lines. I show here that inhibitors of NFκB, including two inhibitors of the proteasome (bortezomib (Velcade™, PS-341) and NPI-0052), a small molecule inhibitor of IKK (PS1145), and a novel synthetic diterpene NIK inhibitor (NPI-1342) reverse TRAIL resistance in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Further analysis revealed that the expression of the anti-apoptosic proteins BclXL and XIAP was significantly decreased following exposure to these inhibitors alone and in combination with TRAIL. Additionally, treatment with NPI0052 and TRAIL significantly reduced tumor burden relative to the control tumors in an L3.6pl orthotopic pancreatic xenograft model. This was associated with a significant decrease in proliferation and an increase in caspase 3 and 8 cleavage. Combination therapy employing PS1145 or NPI-1342 in combination with TRAIL also resulted in a significant reduction in tumor burden compared to either agent alone in a Panc1 orthotopic xenograft model. My studies show that combination therapy with inhibitors of NFκB alone and TRAIL is effective in pre-clinical models of pancreatic cancer and suggests that the approach should be evaluated in patients. ^

Regulation of Net1A subcellular localization by the small GTPase Rac1

Activation of Rho family small G proteins is thought to be a critical event in breast cancer development and metastatic progression. Rho protein activation is stimulated by a family of enzymes known as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (Rho GEFs). The neuroepithelioma transforming gene 1 (Net1) is a Rho GEF specific for the RhoA subfamily that is overexpressed in primary breast tumors and breast cancer cell lines. Net1 isoform expression is also required for migration and invasion of breast cancer cells in vitro. These data indicate that Net1 may be a critical regulator of metastatic progression in breast cancer. Net1 activity is negatively regulated by sequestration in the nucleus, and relocalization of Net1 outside the nucleus is required to stimulate RhoA activation, actin cytoskeletal reorganization, and oncogenic transformation. However, regulatory mechanisms controlling the extranuclear localization of Net1 have not been identified. In this study, we have addressed the regulation of Net1A isoform localization by Rac1. Specifically, co-expression of constitutively active Rac1 with Net1A stimulates the relocalization of Net1A from the nucleus to the plasma membrane in breast cancer cells, and results in Net1A activation. Importantly, Net1A localization is also driven by endogenous Rac1 activity. Net1A relocalizes outside the nucleus in cells spreading on collagen, and when endogenous Rac1 expression was silenced by siRNA, Net1A remained nuclear in spreading cells. These data indicate that Rac1 controls the localization of the Net1A isoform and suggests a physiological role for Net1A in breast cancer cell adhesion and motility.