Functional studies of the homeobox gene {\it Goosecoid\/} during mouse embryogenesis

A fundamental question in developmental biology is to understand the mechanisms that govern the development of an adult individual from a single cell. Goosecoid (Gsc) is an evolutionarily conserved homeobox gene that has been cloned in vertebrates and in Drosophila. In mice, Gsc is first expressed during gastrulation stages where it marks anterior structures of the embryo, this pattern of expression is conserved among vertebrates. Later, expression is observed during organogenesis of the head, limbs and the trunk. The conserved pattern of expression of Gsc during gastrulation and gain of function experiments in Xenopus suggested a function for Gsc in the development of anterior structures in vertebrates. Also, its expression pattern in mouse suggested a role in morphogenesis of the head, limbs and trunk. To determine the functional requirement of Gsc in mice a loss of function mutation was generated by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells and mice mutant for Gsc were generated.^ Gsc-null mice survived to birth but died hours after delivery. Phenotypic analysis revealed craniofacial and rib cage abnormalities that correlated with the second phase of Gsc expression in the head and trunk but no anomalies were found that correlated with its pattern of expression during gastrulation or limb development.^ To determine the mode of action of Gsc during craniofacial development aggregation chimeras were generated between Gsc-null and wild-type embryos. Chimeras were generated by the aggregation of cleavage stage embryos, taking advantage of two different Gsc-null alleles generated during gene targeting. Chimeras demonstrated a cell-autonomous function for Gsc during craniofacial development and a requirement for Gsc function in cartilage and mesenchymal tissues.^ Thus, during embryogenesis in mice, Gsc is not an essential component of gastrulation as had been suggested in previous experiments. Gsc is required for craniofacial development where it acts cell autonomously in cartilage and mesenchymal tissues. Gsc is also required for proper development of the rib cage but it is dispensable for limb development in mice. ^

Activation of DegP chaperone-protease via formation of large cage-like oligomers upon binding to substrate proteins.

Cells use molecular chaperones and proteases to implement the essential quality control mechanism of proteins. The DegP (HtrA) protein, essential for the survival of Escherichia coli cells at elevated temperatures with homologues found in almost all organisms uniquely has both functions. Here we report a mechanism for DegP to activate both functions via formation of large cage-like 12- and 24-mers after binding to substrate proteins. Cryo-electron microscopic and biochemical studies revealed that both oligomers are consistently assembled by blocks of DegP trimers, via pairwise PDZ1-PDZ2 interactions between neighboring trimers. Such interactions simultaneously eliminate the inhibitory effects of the PDZ2 domain. Additionally, both DegP oligomers were also observed in extracts of E. coli cells, strongly implicating their physiological importance.

Functional analysis of MRF4 during mouse embryogenesis

MRF4 is one of four skeletal muscle specific regulatory genes, (the other three genes being MyoD, myf5, and myogenin), each of which has the unique ability to orchestrate an entire program of muscle-specific transcription when introduced into diverse cell types. These findings have led to the notion that these factors function as master regulators of muscle cell fate. Analysis of mice lacking MyoD, myf5, and myogenin have further defined their roles in the commitment and differentiation of myotomal progenitor cells. Current data strongly supports the model that MyoD and myf5 share functional redundancy in determining the muscle cell lineage, while myogenin acts downstream of MyoD and myf5, to initiate myoblast differentiation. Unlike other myogenic bHLH genes, MRF4 is expressed predominantly in the adult, suggesting that it may function to regulate adult muscle maturation and maintenance. To test this hypothesis and to eventually incorporate MRF4 into a general model for muscle specification, differentiation, maturation and maintenance, I deleted the MRF4 gene. MRF4-null mice are viable and fertile, however, they show mild rib anomalies. In addition, the expression of myogenin is dramatically upregulated only in the adult, suggesting that myogenin may compensate for the loss of MRF4 in the adult, and MRF4 may normally suppress the expression of myogenin after birth. MRF4 is also required during muscle regeneration after injury.^ To determine the degree of genetic redundancy between MRF4-myogenin; and MRF4-MyoD, I crossed the MRF4-null mice with MyoD- and myogenin-null mice respectively. There are no additional muscle phenotypes in double-null progeny from a MRF4 and myogenin cross, suggesting that the existence of residual fibers in myogenin-null mice is not due to the presence of MRF4. MRF4 expression also cannot account for the ability of myogenin-null myoblasts to differentiate in vitro. However, the combination of the MRF4-null mutation with the myogenin-null mutation results in a novel rib phenotype. This result suggests that MRF4 modifies the myogenin-null rib phenotype, and MRF4 and myogenin play redundant roles in rib development.^ MRF4 also shares dosage effects with MyoD during mouse development. (MyoD+/$-$;MRF4$-$/$-$)mice are fertile and viable, while (MyoD$-$/$-$;MRF4+/$-$) mice die between birth and two weeks after birth, and have a small skeletal structure. The double homozygous mice for MRF4 and MyoD mutations are embryonic lethal and die at around E10.5. These results suggest that MRF4 and MyoD share overlapping functions during mouse embryogenesis. ^