Structural and functional analysis of p84N5

Normal development and tissue homeostasis requires the carefully orchestrated balance between cell proliferation and cell death. Cell cycle checkpoints control the extent of cell proliferation. Cell death is coordinated through the activation of a cell suicide pathway that results in the morphologically recognizable form of death, apoptosis. Tumorigenesis requires that the balance between these two pathways be disrupted. The tumor suppressor protein Rb has not only been shown to be involved in the enforcement of cell cycle checkpoints, but has also been implicated in playing a role in the regulation of apoptosis. The manner in which Rb enforces cell cycle checkpoints has been well studied; however, its involvement in the regulation of apoptosis is still very unclear. p84N5 is a novel nuclear death domain containing protein that has been shown to interact with the N-terminus of Rb. The fact that it contains a death domain and the fact that it is nuclear localized possibly provides the first known mechanism for apoptotic signaling from the nucleus. The following study tested the hypothesis that the novel exclusively nuclear death domain containing protein p84N5 is an important mediator of programmed cell death and that its apoptotic function is reliant upon its nuclear localization and is regulated by unique functional domains within the p84N5 protein. We identified the p84N5 nuclear localization signal (NLS), eliminated it, and tested the functional significance of nuclear localization by using wild type and mutant sequences fused to EGFP-C1 (Clontech) to create wild type GFPN5 and subsequent mutants. The results of these assays demonstrated exclusive nuclear localization of GFPN5 is required for normal p84N5 induced apoptosis. We further conducted large-scale mutagenesis of the GFPN5 construct to identify a minimal region within p84N5 capable of interacting with Rb. We were able to identify a minimal sequence containing p84N5 amino acids 318 to 464 that was capable of interacting with Rb in co-immunoprecipitation assays. We continued by conducting a structural and functional analysis to identify the region or regions within p84N5 responsible for inducing apoptosis. Point mutations and small-scale deletions within the death domain of p84N5 lessened the effect but did not eliminate p84N5-induced cytotoxicity. Further analysis revealed that the minimal sequence of 318 to 464 of p84N5 was capable of inducing apoptosis to a similar degree as wild-type GFPN5 protein. Since amino acids 318 to 464 of p84N5 are capable of inducing apoptosis and interacting with Rb, we propose possible mechanisms whereby p84N5 may function in a Rb regulated manner. These results demonstrate that p84N5 induced apoptosis is reliant upon its nuclear localization and is regulated by unique functional domains within the p84N5 protein. ^

Evaluating the U.S. Global Health Policy Initiative

In understanding that the efforts made in improving global health affects the health of U.S. citizens, a policy analysis of President Barak Obama's Global Health Initiative was conducted. Using materials gathered from experts in the field of health and their findings and recommendations, paired with the current policies of other G8 countries that pledged to support the efforts of improving global health, the analysis was conducted using four specifically defined criteria. The set criteria determine the appropriateness, responsiveness, effectiveness and equity of Obama's GHI in comparison to other G8 country health policies and overall global health priorities. G8 countries without a specific global health policy, or with a policy that was not in English were excluded from this study and Switzerland, headquarters of the World Health Organization, was added due to its membership in the OECD, and the fact that it has a specific foreign health policy. In evaluating the U.S. Global Health Initiative it is clear that in terms of implementing foreign policy specific to health, the United States is on the forefront alongside the United Kingdom and Switzerland. Other G8 Countries have pledged monies and in order to Millennium Development Health Goals by 2015. The U.S. Global Health Policy does not address issues necessary to meet Millennium Development Goals in Health. Instead the Global Health Initiative is focused narrowly on Fighting and rolling back the HIV/Aids Epidemic based on President Bush's PEPFAR policy. Policy recommendations for a more effective and efficient Global Health Initiative include building upon the PEPFAR policy foundation in order to strengthen health systems worldwide, allowing individuals and communities to combat unnecessary death and disease through research, education, and other preventative methods.^

On Bayesian seamless phase I-II designs

Early phase clinical trial designs have long been the focus of interest for clinicians and statisticians working in oncology field. There are several standard phse I and phase II designs that have been widely-implemented in medical practice. For phase I design, the most commonly used methods are 3+3 and CRM. A newly-developed Bayesian model-based mTPI design has now been used by an increasing number of hospitals and pharmaceutical companies. The advantages and disadvantages of these three top phase I designs have been discussed in my work here and their performances were compared using simulated data. It was shown that mTPI design exhibited superior performance in most scenarios in comparison with 3+3 and CRM designs. ^ The next major part of my work is proposing an innovative seamless phase I/II design that allows clinicians to conduct phase I and phase II clinical trials simultaneously. Bayesian framework was implemented throughout the whole design. The phase I portion of the design adopts mTPI method, with the addition of futility rule which monitors the efficacy performance of the tested drugs. Dose graduation rules were proposed in this design to allow doses move forward from phase I portion of the study to phase II portion without interrupting the ongoing phase I dose-finding schema. Once a dose graduated to phase II, adaptive randomization was used to randomly allocated patients into different treatment arms, with the intention of more patients being assigned to receive more promising dose(s). Again simulations were performed to compare the performance of this innovative phase I/II design with a recently published phase I/II design, together with the conventional phase I and phase II designs. The simulation results indicated that the seamless phase I/II design outperform the other two competing methods in most scenarios, with superior trial power and the fact that it requires smaller sample size. It also significantly reduces the overall study time. ^ Similar to other early phase clinical trial designs, the proposed seamless phase I/II design requires that the efficacy and safety outcomes being able to be observed in a short time frame. This limitation can be overcome by using validated surrogate marker for the efficacy and safety endpoints.^