Mechanism of methylation gene reactivation in human cancer cells

Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes by DNA hypermethylation at promoter regions is a common event in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Abrogation of methylation and reversal of epigenetic silencing is a very potent way in cancer treatment. However, the reactivation mechanisms are poorly understood. In this study, we first developed a cell line model system named YB5, derived from SW48 cancer cell line, which bears one copy of stably integrated EGFP gene on Chromosome 1p31.1 region. The GFP gene expression is transcriptionally silenced due to the hypermethylated promoter CMV. However, the GFP expression can be restored using demethylating agent 5-aza-2' deoxycytidine (DAC), and detected by FACS and fluorescent microscopy. Using this system, we observed the heterogeneous reactivation induced by DAC treatment. After flow sorting, GFP negative cells exhibited similar level of incomplete demethylation compared to GFP positive cells on repetitive LINE1 element, tumor suppressor genes such as P16, CDH13, and RASSF1a, and CMV promoter as well. However, the local chromatin of CMV-GFP locus altered to an open structure marked by high H3 lysine 9 acetylation and low H3 lysine 27 tri-methylation in GFP positive cells, while the GFP negative cells retained mostly the original repressive marks. Thus, we concluded that DAC induced DNA hypomethylation alone does not directly determine the level of re-expression, and the resetting of the local chromatin structure under hypomethylation environment is required for gene reactivation. Besides, a lentivirus vector-based shRNA screening was performed using the YB5 system. Although it is the rare chance that vector lands in the neighboring region of GFP, we found that the exogenous vector DNA inserted into the upstream region of GFP gene locus led to the promoter demethylation and reactivated the silenced GFP gene. Thus, epigenetic state can be affected by changing of the adjacent nucleic acid sequences. Further, this hypermethylation silenced system was utilized for epigenetic drug screening. We have found that DAC combined with carboplatin would enhance the GFP% yield and increase expression of other tumor suppressor genes than DAC alone, and this synergistic effect may be related to DNA repair process. In summary, these studies reveal that reversing of methylation silencing requires coordinated alterations of DNA methylation, chromatin structure, and local microenvironment. ^

Role of {\it ERCC1\/} in DNA repair and genetic recombination

The ERCC1 (Excision Repair Cross-Complementing-1) gene is the presumptive mammalian homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD10 gene. In mammalian NER, the Ercc1/XpF complex functions as an endonuclease that specifically recognizes 5$\sp\prime$ double-strand-3$\sp\prime$ single-strand structures. In yeast, the analogous function is performed by the Rad1/Rad10 complex. These observations and the conservation of amino acid homology between the Rad1 and XpF and the Rad10 and Ercc1 proteins has led to a general assumption of functional homology between these genes.^ In addition to NER, the Rad1/Rad10 endonuclease complex is also required in certain specialized mitotic recombination pathways in yeast. However, a similiar requirement for the endonuclease function of the Ercc1/XpF complex during genetic recombination in mammalian cells has not been directly demonstrated. The experiments performed in these studies were designed to determine if ERCC1 deficiency would produce recombination-deficient phenotypes in CHO cells similar to those observed in RAD10 deletion mutants, including: (1) decreased single-reciprocal exchange recombination, and (2) inability to process 5$\sp\prime$ sequence heterology in recombination intermediates.^ Specifically, these studies describe: (1) The isolation and characterization of the ERCC1 locus of Chinese hamster ovary cells; (2) The production of an ERCC1 null mutant cell line by targeted knock-out of the endogenous ERCC1 gene in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line, CHO-ATS49tg, which contains an endogenous locus, APRT, suitable as a chromosomal target for homologous recombination; (3) The characterization of mutant ERCC1 alleles from a panel of Chinese hamster ovary cell ERCC1 mutants derived by conventional mutagenesis; (4) An investigation of the effects of ERCC1 mutation on mitotic recombination through targeting of the APRT locus in an ERCC1 null background.^ The results of these studies strongly suggest that the role of ERCC1 in homologous recombination in mammalian cells is analogous to that of the yeast RAD10 gene. ^

Elucidation of the role of 53BP1 in DNA double strand break (DSB) repair and tumor suppression

The protein p53 binding protein one (53BP1) was discovered in a yeast two-hybrid screen that used the DNA binding domain of p53 as bait. Cloning of full-length 53BP1 showed that this protein contains several protein domains which help make up the protein, which include two tandem BRCT domains and a amino-terminal serine/glutamine cluster domain (SCD). These are two protein domains are often seen in factors that are involved in the cellular response to DNA damage and control of cell cycle checkpoints and we hypothesize that 53BP1 is involved in the cellular response to DNA damage. In support of this hypothesis we observe that 53BP1 is phosphorylated and undergoes a dramatic nuclear re-localization in response to DNA damaging agents. 53BP1 also interacts with several factors that are important in the cellular response to DNA damage, such as the BRCA1 tumor suppressor, ATM and Rad3 related (ATR), and the phosphorylated version of the histone variant H2AX. Mice deficient in 53BP1 display increased sensitivity ionizing radiation (IR), a DNA damaging agent that introduces DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). In addition, 53BP1-deficient mice do not properly undergo the process of class switch recombination (CSR). We also observe that when a defect in 53BP1 is combined with a defect in p53; the resulting mice have an increased rate of formation of spontaneous tumors, notably the formation of B and T lineage lymphomas. The T lineage tumors arise by two distinct mechanisms: one driven by defects in cell cycle regulation and a second driven by defects in the ability to repair DNA DSBs. The B lineage tumors arise by the inability to repair DNA damage and over-expression of the oncogene c-myc. ^ With these observations, we conclude that not only does 53BP1 function in the cellular response to DNA damage, but it also works in concert with p53 to suppress tumor formation. ^