TRIM24-REGULATED ESTROGEN RESPONSE IS DEPENDENT ON SPECIFIC HISTONE MODIFICATIONS IN BREAST CANCER CELLS

In this dissertation, I discovered that function of TRIM24 as a co-activator of ERα-mediated transcriptional activation is dependent on specific histone modifications in tumorigenic human breast cancer-derived MCF7 cells. In the first part, I proved that TRIM24-PHD finger domain, which recognizes unmethylated histone H3 lysine K4 (H3K4me0), is critical for ERα-regulated transcription. Therefore, when LSD1-mediated demethylation of H3K4 is inhibited, activation of TRIM24-regulated ERα target genes is greatly impaired. Importantly, I demonstrated that TRIM24 and LSD1 are cyclically recruited to estrogen responsive elements (EREs) in a time-dependent manner upon estrogen induction, and depletion of their expression exert corresponding time-dependent effect on target gene activation. I also identified that phosphorylation of histone H3 threonine T6 disrupts TRIM24 from binding to the chromatin and from activating ERα-regulated targets. In the second part, I revealed that TRIM24 depletion has additive effect to LSD1 inhibitor- and Tamoxifen-mediated reduction in survival and proliferation in breast cancer cells.

Mechanisms of apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable disease characterized by the accumulation of terminally differentiated, mature B cells that do not progress beyond the G1 stage of cell cycle, suggesting that these cells possess intrinsic defects in apoptosis. Treatment relies heavily on chemotherapy (primarily nucleoside analogs and glucocorticoids) that may initially be effective in patients, but ultimately give rise to refractory, untreatable disease. The purpose of this study was to determine whether key components of the apoptotic machinery were intact in CLL lymphocytes, especially in patients refractory to therapy. ^ Activation of proteases has been shown to be at the core of the apoptotic pathway and this work demonstrates that protease activation is required for glucocorticoid and nucleoside analog-induced apoptosis in CLL cells. Inhibitors of serine proteases as well as caspase inhibitors blocked induced DNA fragmentation, and a peptide inhibitor of the nuclear scaffold (NS) protease completely suppressed both induced and spontaneous apoptosis. However, the NS protease inhibitor actually promoted several pro-apoptotic events, such as caspase activation, exposure of surface phosphatidylserine, and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. These results suggested that the NS protease may interact with the apoptotic program in CLL cells at two separate points. ^ In order to further investigate the role of the NS protease in CLL, patient isolates were treated with proteasome inhibitors because of previous results suggesting that the ISIS protease might be a β subunit of the proteasome. Proteasome inhibitors induced massive DNA fragmentation in every patient tested, even in those resistant to the effects of glucocorticoid and nucleoside analogs in vitro. Several other features of apoptosis were also promoted by the proteasome inhibitor, including mitochondrial alterations such as release of cytochrome c and drops in mitochondrial membrane potential. Proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis was associated with inhibition of NFκB, a proteasome-regulated transcription factor that has been implicated in the suppression of apoptosis in a number of systems. The NS protease inhibitor also caused a decrease in active NFκB, suggesting that the proapoptotic effects of this agent might be due to depletion of NFκB. ^ Given these findings, the role of NFκB, in conferring survival in CLL was investigated. Glucocorticoid hormone treatment was shown to cause decreases in the activity of the transcription factor, while phorbol dibutyrate, which blocks glucocorticoid-induced DNA fragmentation, was capable of upregulating NFκB. Compellingly, introduction of an undegradable form of the constitutive NFκB inhibitor, IκB, caused DNA fragmentation in several patient isolates, some of which were resistant to glucocorticoid in vitro. Transcription of anti-apoptotic proteins by NFκB was postulated to be responsible for its effects on survival, but Bcl-2 levels did not fluctuate with glucocorticoid or proteasome inhibitor treatment. ^ The in vitro values generated from these studies were organized into a database containing numbers for over 250 patients. Correlation of relevant clinical parameters revealed that levels of spontaneous apoptosis in vitro differ significantly between Rai stages. Importantly, in vitro resistance to nucleoside analogs or glucocorticoids predicted resistance to chemotherapy in vivo, and inability to achieve remission. ^

Stromal derived growth factor alpha (SDF-1α) induces the differentiation of bone marrow progenitor cells (BMCs) into pericytes by regulating platelet derived growth factor B (PDGF-B) transcription

We previously demonstrated that bone marrow cells (BMCs) migrate to TC71 and A4573 Ewing’s sarcoma tumors where they can differentiate into endothelial cells (ECs) and pericytes and, participate in the tumor vascular development. This process of neo-vascularization, known as vasculogenesis, is essential for Ewing’s sarcoma growth with the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF165, being the chemotactic factor for BMC migration to the tumor site. Inhibiting VEGF165 in TC71 tumors (TC/siVEGF7-1) inhibited BMC infiltration to the tumor site and tumor growth. Introducing the stromal-derived growth factor (SDF-1α) into the TC/siVEGF7-1 tumors partially restored vasculogenesis with infiltration of BMCs to a perivascular area where they differentiated into pericytes and rescued tumor growth. RNA collected from the SDF-1α-treated TC/siVEGF7-1 tumors also revealed an increase in platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGF-B) mRNA levels. PDGF-B expression is elevated in several cancer types and the role of PDGF-B and its receptor, PDGFR-β, has been extensively described in the process of pericyte maturation. However, the mechanisms by which PDGF-B expression is up-regulated during vascular remodeling and the process by which BMCs differentiate into pericytes during tumor vasculogenesis remain areas of investigation. In this study, we are the first to demonstrate that SDF-1α regulates the expression of PDGF-B via a transcriptional mechanism which involves binding of the ELK-1 transcription factor to the pdgf-b promoter. We are also first to validate the critical role of the SDF-1α/PDGF-B pathway in the differentiation of BMCs into pericytes both in vitro and in vivo. SDF-1α up-regulated PDGF-B expression in both TC/siVEGF7-1 and HEK293 cells. In contrast, down-regulating SDF-1α, down-regulated PDGF-B. We cloned the 2 kb pdgf-b promoter fragment into the pGL3 reporter vector and showed that SDF-1α induced pdgf-b promoter activity. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and demonstrated that the ELK-1 transcription factor bound to the pdgf-b promoter in response to SDF-1α stimulation in both TC/siVEGF7-1 and HEK293 cells. We collected BMCs from the hind femurs of mice and cultured the cells in medium containing SDF-1α and PDGF-B and found that PDGFR-β+ BMCs differentiated into NG2 and desmin positive pericytes in vitro. In contrast, inhibiting SDF-1α and PDGF-B abolished this differentiation process. In vivo, we injected TC71 or A4573 tumor-bearing mice with the SDF-1α antagonist, AMD3100 and found that inhibiting SDF-1α signaling in the tumor microenvironment decreased the tumor microvessel density, decreased the tumor blood vessel perfusion and, increased tumor cell apoptosis. We then analyzed the effect of AMD3100 on vasculogenesis of Ewing’s sarcoma and found that BMCs migrated to the tumor site where they differentiated into ECs but, they did not form thick perivascular layers of NG2 and desmin positive pericytes. Finally, we stained the AMD3100-treated tumors for PDGF-B and showed that inhibiting SDF-1α signaling also inhibited PDGF-B expression. All together, these findings demonstrated that the SDF-1α/PDGF-B pathway plays a critical role in the formation of BM-derived pericytes during vasculogenesis of Ewing’s sarcoma tumors.

Structure-function relation in retinoid regulated gene expression

Retinoids are known to inhibit proliferation of and induce terminal differentiation of many normal and transformed cells. It has been postulated that retinoids exert their effect by altering gene expression. HL-60 cells and macrophages both respond to retinoic acid action by the rapid induction of the enzyme tissue transglutaminase. The induction has been shown to be due to increased transcription of the transglutaminase gene. The first part of the dissertation studied the structure-function relationship of retinoid-regulated transglutaminase induction, differentiation and proliferation in HL-60 cells using retinoid analogs. The results indicated strict structural constraints and a strong structure-function correlation between transglutaminase induction and differentiation; those retinoids that induced transglutaminase also induced differentiation, those analogs that did not induce transglutaminase could not induce differentiation. The ability of the retinoids to induce transglutaminase in HL-60 cells was paralleled in macrophages. However, the antiproliferative effect of the retinoids displayed less stringent structural constraints than their differentiation- and transglutaminase-inducing properties. Specifically all the retinoids were able to inhibit proliferation to varying extents. It is concluded that the induction of transglutaminase and of differentiation by retinoids is mediated by receptors. While receptor mediation cannot be entirely ruled out, with the current data no definitive statement can be made about the antiproliferative activity of retinoids. Also, the concordance in the ability of the retinoids to induce transglutaminase and the ability to induce differentiation of HL-60 cells suggests that the former is an early response of the cells to retinoids and differentiation a later consequence on the same pathway. Using the induction of transglutaminase as an index of the direct, or primary, effect of retinoids on gene expression, the second part of the dissertation investigates, by 2D gel electrophoresis, the alteration in the rates of synthesis of other proteins in macrophages and HL-60 cells in response to short incubations with retinoic acid. Any changes in parallel with transglutaminase were taken to indicate proteins directly under the control of retinoic acid. It is concluded that retinoic acid regulates the expression of a circumscribed set of genes in a cell-specific manner. The results support the hypothesis that retinoids exert their multiple effects on myeloid cells, in part, by receptor-mediated alternations in gene expression. ^

Regulation of XMyoDa transcription by the binding of XMEF2A to the TATA box

MEF2 is a $\underline{\rm m}$yocyte-specific $\underline{\rm e}$nhancer-binding $\underline{\rm f}$actor that binds a conserved DNA sequence, CTA(A/T)$\sb4$TAG. A MEF2 binding site in the XMyoDa promoter overlaps with the TATA box and is required for muscle specific expression. To examine the potential role of MEF2 in the regulation of MyoD transcription during early development, the appearance of MEF2 binding activity in developing Xenopus embryos was analyzed with the electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Two genes were isolated from a X. Laevis stage 24 cDNA library that encode factors that bind the XMyoDa TFIID/MEF2 site. Both genes are highly homologous to each other, belong to the MADS ($\underline{\rm M}$CM1-$\underline{\rm A}$rg80-agamous-$\underline{\rm d}$eficiens-$\underline{\rm S}$RF) protein family, and most highly related to the mammalian MEF2A gene, hence they are designated as XMEF2A1 and XMEF2A2. Proteins encoded by both cDNAs form specific complexes with the MEF2 binding site and show the same binding specificity as the endogenous MEF2 binding activity. XMEF2A transcripts accumulate preferentially in developing somites after the appearance of XMyoD transcripts. XMEF2 protein begins to accumulate in somites at tailbud stages. Transcriptional activation of XMyoD promoter by XMEF2A required only the MADS box and MEF2-specific domain when XMEF2A is bound at the TATA box. However, a different downstream transactivation domain was required when XMEF2A activates transcription through binding to multiple upstream sites. These results suggest that different activation mechanisms are involved, depending on where the factor is bound. Mutations in several basic amino acid clusters in the MADS box inhibit DNA binding suggesting these amino acids are essential for DNA binding. Mutation of Thr-20 and Ser-36 to the negatively charged amino acid residue, aspartic acid, abolish DNA binding. XMEF2A activity may be regulated by phosphorylation of these amino acids. A dominant negative mutant was made by mutating one of the basic amino acid clusters and deleting the downstream transactivation domain. In vivo roles of MEF2 in the regulation of MyoD transcription were investigated by overexpression of wild type MEF2 and dominant negative mutant of XMEF2A in animal caps and assaying for the effects on the level of expression of MyoD genes. Overexpression of MEF2 activates the transcription of endogenous MyoD gene family while expression of a dominant negative mutant reduces the level of transcription of XMRF4 and myogenin genes. These results suggest that MEF2 is downstream of MyoD and Myf5 and that MEF2 is involved in maintaining and amplifying expression of MyoD and Myf5. MEF2 is upstream of MRF4 and myogenin and plays a role in activating their expression. ^

Alteration of CEACAM1 gene transcription in prostate cancer cells: The role of AR, Sp2, and HDAC

Cell to cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM1), a type II tumor suppressor, has been found to be down-regulated in prostate cancer cells. The mechanism that causes CEACAM1's down-regulation in tumorigenesis is unknown. Here we show that the transcriptional activity of CEACAM1 is decreased in prostate cancer cells. This decrease is not due to methylation of the CEACAM1's promoter, but rather to the alteration of transcription factors regulating CEACAM1 expression. ^ Since androgen/androgen receptors (AR) are potent regulators of prostate growth and differentiation, their role on CEACAM1 gene transcription was examined. The androgen receptor could directly increase CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in a ligand dependent manner by interacting with an AR consensus element that resides in the CEACAM1 promoter. However, AR binding to the CEACAM1 promoter is not related to the loss of CEACAM1 during prostate cancer progression. ^ Further analysis enabled us to determine the particular region in the CEACAM1 promoter that mediates a decrease in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells. Upon further examination, we found that this CEACAM1 promoter region interacts with the Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 transcription factors. However, only Sp2 expression was found to increase in prostate cancer cells. Inhibiting Sp2 from binding to the CEACAM1 promoter caused an increase in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells. In addition, over-expressing Sp2 in normal prostate cells resulted in a decrease in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity and endogenous protein expression. These observations suggest that Sp2 is a transcription repressor of CEACAM1. Furthermore, prostate cancer cells treated with trichostatin A (TSA), a specific histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, activated CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. This implies that HDACs are involved in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. Mutation of the Sp2 DNA binding region on the CEACAM1 promoter inhibited TSA activation of CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. This indicates that HDACs inhibit CEACAM1 transcriptional activity through Sp2. Base on these results, we propose that Sp2 is critical for down-regulating CEACAM1 expression, and one mechanism by which Sp2 represses CEACAM1 expression is by recruiting HDAC to the CEACAM1 promoter in prostate cancer cells. Collectively, these findings provide novel insights into mechanisms that cause the down-regulation of CEACAM1 expression in prostate cancer cells. ^

New aspects of estrogen action in the endometrium: Reciprocal interplay with retinoic acid pathway and a novel estrogen-regulated gene

The uterine endometrium is a major target for the estrogen. However, the molecular basis of estrogen action in the endometrium is largely unknown. I have used two approaches to study the effects of estrogen on the endometrium. One approach involved the study of the interaction between estrogen and retinoic acid (RA) pathways in the endometrium. I have demonstrated that estrogen administration to rodents and estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in postmenopausal women selectively induced the endometrial expression of retinaldehyde dehydrogenase II (RALDH2), a critical enzyme of RA biosynthesis. RALDH2 was expressed exclusively in the stromal cells, especially in the stroma adjacent to the luminal and glandular epithelia. The induction of RALDH2 by estrogen required estrogen receptor and occurred via a direct increase in RALDH2 transcription. Among the three RA receptors, estrogen selectively induced the expression of RARα. In parallel, estrogen also increased the utilization of all-trans retinol (the substrate for RA biosynthesis) and the expression of two RA-regulated marker genes, cellular retinoic acid binding protein II (CRABP2) and tissue transglutaminase (tTG) in the endometrium. Thus estrogen coordinately upregulated both the production and signaling of RA in both the rodent and human endometrium. This coordinate upregulation of RA system appeared to play a role in counterbalancing the stimulatory effects of estrogen on the endometrium, since the depletion of endogenous RA in mice led to an increase in estrogen-stimulated stromal proliferation and endometrial Akt phosphorylation. In addition, I have also used a systematic approach (DNA microarray) to categorize genes and pathways affected by the ERT in the endometrium of postmenopausal women and identified a novel estrogen-regulated gene EIG121. EIG121 was exclusively expressed in the glandular epithelial cells of the endometrium and induced by estrogen in vivo and in cultured cell lines. Compared with the normal endometrium, EIG121 was highly overexpressed in type 1 endometrial cancer, but profoundly suppressed in type 2 endometrial tumors. Taken together, these studies suggested that estrogen regulates the expression of many genes of both the pro-proliferative and anti-proliferative pathways and the abnormality of these pathways may increase the risks for estrogen-dependent endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. ^

The role of coactivator associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) in nuclear receptor mediated transcription

Arginine methylation has been implicated in the regulation of gene expression. The coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARMI/PRMT4) binds the p160 family of steroid receptor coactivators (SRCs). This association enhances transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors. Here, we generated and characterized CARM1 knockout mice. Embryos with a targeted disruption of CARM1 are 35% smaller in size than the wild-type littermates and die perinatally. We also generated Carm1-/- and Carm1+/+ mouse embryonic fibroblasts and tested gene expression in response to estrogen. Estrogenresponsive gene expression was aberrant in Carm1-/- fibroblasts and embryos, thus emphasizing the role of arginine methylation as a transcription activation tag. We subsequently studied the role of CARM1 in estrogen signaling in viva in the mammary gland. Conditional knockout of CARM1 in mammary gland and Carml-1-embryonic mammary anlagen transplant experiments did not show any defects in growth and development of the glands. To further dissect the role of CARM1 in estrogen receptor mediated transactivation, we performed cDNA microarray and serial analysis of gene expression on Carm1-/- and Carm1+/+ embryos treated with the estrogen analog, DES. Our results indicate global changes in estrogen regulated genes as well as genes involved in lipid homeostasis. Marker genes for Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) activity, adipsin and aP2, are downregulated in the Carm1-/- embryos. Furthermore, OCT frozen sections of 18.5dpc embryos, processed simultaneously for oil red O staining to look for neutral fat, reveals greatly reduced brown fat accumulation in the Carm1-/- embryos in contrast to wild-type and gain-of-function Carm1 transgenic (ubiquitous) embryo. We used a well-established 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cell line to knockdown CARM1 by short hairpin RNA. 3T3-L1 cells with CARM1 knockdown showed greatly reduced potential to differentiate into mature lipid accumulating adipocytes upon administration of adipogenic stimuli. Ligand-dependent activation of reporter genes by the PPARγ receptor showed that PPRE-luciferase reporter activity was enhanced in the presence of CARM1, additionally, luciferase activity was reduced to background levels when enzyme dead CARM1 (CARM1-VLD) was used. Thus, in this study, we have identified novel pathways that use CARM1 as coactivator and showed that CARM1 functions as a key component of PPARγ receptor mediated gene expression. ^

Alterations in cell adhesion and migration are transcriptionally regulated by the tumor suppressor, TP53

The p53 transcription factor is a tumor suppressor and a master regulator of apoptosis and the cell cycle in response to cell stress. In some advanced tumors, such as prostate cancers, the loss of p53 correlates with an increase in the occurrence of metastases. In addition, several groups have suggested that p53 status correlates with changes in cell migration and cell morphology associated with a migratory phenotype. Others have identified several genes with roles in cell migration that are directly transcriptionally regulated by p53. Even so, modulation of cell migration is not widely recognized as a p53 stress response. ^ In an effort to identify novel p53 target genes and expand our knowledge of the p53 transcriptional response, we performed Affymetrix gene expression analysis in p53-null PC3 prostate cancer cells following infection with a control virus or adenoviral construct expressing wild-type p53. Over 300 genes that had not been previously recognized as p53 target genes were identified. Of these genes, 224 were upregulated and 111 were downregulated (p<0.05). Functional over-representation analysis identified cell migration as a significantly over-represented biological function of p53. Further analysis identified two genes that are critical for the control of cell migration as potential p53 targets. One, hyaluronan mediated motility receptor (HMMR), has recently been shown to be a p53 target important for regulation of the cell cycle. Here, we show that HMMR is downregulated by p53 in several cell lines, and HMMR's regulation is dependent on the presence of the cdk inhibitor, p21, and histone deactelyase activity. The other gene, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1), itself a tumor suppressor, is shown here, for the first time, as a p53 direct target by ChIP analysis. We next determined the effect of p53 activation on cell migration and found that p53 significantly slows the rate of cell migration in Boyden chamber migration assays and digital videomicroscopy wound healing studies. Further, our studies established the specific roles of CEACAM1 and HMMR in cell migration and determine that loss of CEACAM1 and overexpression of HMMR independently contribute to increased cell migration. Taken together, these studies provide a direct mechanistic link between p53 to the regulatory control of specific target genes that mediate cell adhesion and migration. ^

Functional studies of a LIM -homeodomain transcription factor lmx1b in murine mid -hindbrain and limb development

This thesis is centered on applying molecular genetics to study pattern formation during animal development. More specifically, this thesis describes the functional studies of a LIM-homeodomain gene called lmx1b during murine embryogenesis. Lmx1b expression is restricted to the mid-hindbrain junction as well as to the dorsal mesenchyme of the limb, suggesting important functions during mid-hindbrain and limb development. To test these possibilities, lmx1b homozygous mutant mice were generated and their limb and CNS phenotypes examined. Lmx1b homozygous mutant mice exhibit a large reduction of mid-hindbrain structures, and that their limbs are symmetrical along the dorsal-ventral axis as the result of a dorsal to ventral transformation. Taken together, these studies define essential functions for lmx1b in mid-hindbrain patteming and in dorsal limb cell fate determination. However, the molecular mechanisms which accounts for these phenotypes are unknown, and whether lmx1b has same or distinctive functions during the mid-hindbrain and limb development is also unclear. ^ Recently, insight into molecular mechanisms of mid-hindbrain patterning and limb development has resulted from the identification of several factors with restricted expression patterns within these regions. These include the secreted factors wnt-1, fgf-8, wnt-7a and the transcription factors pax-2, and en-1. Targeted disruption of any of these genes in mice suggests that these genes might be involved in similar regulatory pathways. Analysis of the expression of these genes in lmx1b mutants demonstrates that lmxlb is not required for the initiation, but is required to maintain their expression at the mid-hindbrain junction. Thus, lmxlb is not required for specifying mid-hindbrain cell fates, rather, it functions to ensure the establishment or maintenance of a proper organizing center at the mid-hindbrain junction. Interestingly, lmxlb functions cell non-autonomously in chimera analysis, which indicates that lmx1b might regulate the expression of secreted factors such as wnt-1 and/or fgf-8 in the organizing center. In contrast, lmx1b functions cell autonomously in the dorsal limb to govern dorsal ventral limb development and its expression is regulated by with wnt-7a and en-1. However, single and double mutant analysis suggest that all three genes have partially overlapping functions as well as independent functions. The results point toward a complicated network of cross-talks among all three limb axes. ^