{\it Hox\/} genes and specification of regional identity in the axial skeleton: Analysis of the individual and combined mutant phenotypes of the paralogous group 4 murine {\it Hox\/} genes; {\it hoxa\/}-4, {\it hoxb\/}-4 and {\it hoxd\/}-4

The Hox gene products are transcription factors involved in specifying regional identity along the anteroposterior body axis. In Drosophila, where these genes are known as HOM-C (Homeotic-complex) genes and where they have been most extensively studied, they are expressed in restricted domains along the anteroposterior axis with different anterior limits. Genetic analysis of a large number of gain- and loss-of-function alleles of these genes has revealed that these genes are important in specifying segmental identity at their anterior limits of expression. Furthermore, there is a functional dominance of posterior genes over anterior genes, such that posterior genes can dominantly specify their developmental programs in spite of the expression of more anterior genes in the same segment. In the mouse, there are four clusters of HOM-C genes, called Hox genes. Thus, there may be up to four genes, called paralogs, that are more highly homologous to each other and to their Drosophila homolog than they are to the other mouse Hox genes. The single mutants for two paralogous genes, hoxa-4 and hoxd-4, presented in this dissertation, are similar to several other mouse Hox mutants in that they show partial, incompletely penetrant homeotic transformations of vertebrae at their anterior limit of expression. These mutants were then bred with hoxb-4 mutants (Ramirez-Solis, et al. 1993) to generate the three possible double mutant combinations as well as the triple mutant. The skeletal phenotypes of these group 4 Hox compound mutants displayed clear alterations in regional identity, such that a nearly complete transformation towards the morphology of the first cervical vertebra occurs. These results suggest a certain degree of functional redundancy among paralogous genes in specifying regional identity. Furthermore, there was a remarkable dose-dependent increase in the number of vertebrae transformed to a first cervical vertebra identity, including the second through the fifth cervical vertebrae in the triple mutant. Thus, these genes are required in a larger anteroposterior domain than is revealed by the single mutant phenotypes alone, such that multiple mutations in these genes result in transformations of vertebrae that are not at their anterior limit of expression. ^

Functional analysis of MRF4 during mouse embryogenesis

MRF4 is one of four skeletal muscle specific regulatory genes, (the other three genes being MyoD, myf5, and myogenin), each of which has the unique ability to orchestrate an entire program of muscle-specific transcription when introduced into diverse cell types. These findings have led to the notion that these factors function as master regulators of muscle cell fate. Analysis of mice lacking MyoD, myf5, and myogenin have further defined their roles in the commitment and differentiation of myotomal progenitor cells. Current data strongly supports the model that MyoD and myf5 share functional redundancy in determining the muscle cell lineage, while myogenin acts downstream of MyoD and myf5, to initiate myoblast differentiation. Unlike other myogenic bHLH genes, MRF4 is expressed predominantly in the adult, suggesting that it may function to regulate adult muscle maturation and maintenance. To test this hypothesis and to eventually incorporate MRF4 into a general model for muscle specification, differentiation, maturation and maintenance, I deleted the MRF4 gene. MRF4-null mice are viable and fertile, however, they show mild rib anomalies. In addition, the expression of myogenin is dramatically upregulated only in the adult, suggesting that myogenin may compensate for the loss of MRF4 in the adult, and MRF4 may normally suppress the expression of myogenin after birth. MRF4 is also required during muscle regeneration after injury.^ To determine the degree of genetic redundancy between MRF4-myogenin; and MRF4-MyoD, I crossed the MRF4-null mice with MyoD- and myogenin-null mice respectively. There are no additional muscle phenotypes in double-null progeny from a MRF4 and myogenin cross, suggesting that the existence of residual fibers in myogenin-null mice is not due to the presence of MRF4. MRF4 expression also cannot account for the ability of myogenin-null myoblasts to differentiate in vitro. However, the combination of the MRF4-null mutation with the myogenin-null mutation results in a novel rib phenotype. This result suggests that MRF4 modifies the myogenin-null rib phenotype, and MRF4 and myogenin play redundant roles in rib development.^ MRF4 also shares dosage effects with MyoD during mouse development. (MyoD+/$-$;MRF4$-$/$-$)mice are fertile and viable, while (MyoD$-$/$-$;MRF4+/$-$) mice die between birth and two weeks after birth, and have a small skeletal structure. The double homozygous mice for MRF4 and MyoD mutations are embryonic lethal and die at around E10.5. These results suggest that MRF4 and MyoD share overlapping functions during mouse embryogenesis. ^

AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF RACE, INCOME, EDUCATION, AND FOOD STAMP PROGRAM PARTICIPATION/NONPARTICIPATION ON THE FOOD AND NUTRIENT CONSUMPTION OF A NORTH FLORIDA URBAN CLINIC POPULATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SURVEY OF NUTRITION RELATED HABITS AND ATTITUDES

The relative influence of race, income, education, and Food Stamp Program participation/nonparticipation on the food and nutrient intake of 102 fecund women ages 18-45 years in a Florida urban clinic population was assessed using the technique of multiple regression analysis. Study subgroups were defined by race and Food Stamp Program participation status. Education was found to have the greatest influence on food and nutrient intake. Race was the next most influential factor followed in order by Food Stamp Program participation and income. The combined effect of the four independent variables explained no more than 19 percent of the variance for any of the food and nutrient intake variables. This would indicate that a more complex model of influences is needed if variations in food and nutrient intake are to be fully explained.^ A socioeconomic questionnaire was administered to investigate other factors of influence. The influence of the mother, frequency and type of restaurant dining, and perceptions of food intake and weight were found to be factors deserving further study.^ Dietary data were collected using the 24-hour recall and food frequency checklist. Descriptive dietary findings indicated that iron and calcium were nutrients where adequacy was of concern for all study subgroups. White Food Stamp Program participants had the greatest number of mean nutrient intake values falling below the 1980 Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs). When Food Stamp Program participants were contrasted to nonparticipants, mean intakes of six nutrients (kilocalories, calcium, iron, vitamin A, thiamin, and riboflavin) were below the 1980 RDA compared to five mean nutrient intakes (kilocalories, calcium, iron, thiamin and riboflavin) for the nonparticipants. Use of the Index of Nutritional Quality (INQ), however, revealed that the quality of the diet of Food Stamp Program participants per 1000 kilocalories was adequate with exception of calcium and iron. Intakes of these nutrients were also not adequate on a 1000 kilocalorie basis for the nonparticipant group. When mean nutrient intakes of the groups were compared using Student's t-test oleicacid intake was the only significant difference found. Being a nonparticipant in the Food Stamp Program was found to be associated with more frequent consumption of cookies, sweet rolls, doughnuts, and honey. The findings of this study contradict the negative image of the Food Stamp Program participant and emphasize the importance of education. ^