Mapping and characterization of the Xlsirt P11 RNA cis-acting localization element

In many organisms, polarity of the oocyte is established post-transcriptionally via subcellular RNA localization. Many RNAs are localized during oogenesis in Xenopus laevis, including Xlsirts ( Xenopus laevis short interspersed repeat transcripts) [Kloc, 1993]. Xlsirts constitute a large family defined by highly homologous repeat units 79–81 nucleotides in length. Endogenous Xlsirt RNAs use the METRO (Message Transport Organizer) pathway of localization, where RNAs are transported from the nucleus to the mitochondrial cloud in stage I oocytes. Secondly, RNAs anchor at the vegetal pole in stage II oocytes. Exogenous Xlsirt RNAs can also utilize the Late pathway of localization, which involves localization to the vegetal cortex during stage III of oogenesis and results in RNAs anchored in the cortex of the entire vegetal hemisphere. ^ The Xlsirts localization signal is contained within the repeat region. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that there are cis -acting localization elements in Xlsirts, and that higher order structure plays a role. Results of experiments on Xlsirt P11, a 1700 basepair (bp) family member, led to the conclusion that a 137-bp fragment of the repetitive region is necessary and sufficient for METRO and Late pathway localization. This analysis definitively demonstrates that the Xlsirt localization signal for the METRO and Late pathways reside within the repetitive region and not within the flanking regions. Analysis of Xlsirt linker scanning mutations revealed two METRO-pathway specific subelements, and one Late-pathway specific subelement. Functional, computer, and biochemical evidence relates the higher order structure of this element to its ability to function as a localization element. ^ Xlsirt 137 is 99% identical to the Xlsirt consensus sequence identified in this study, suggesting that it is the localization element for all localized Xlsirt family members. The repeat unit was reframed based on function, rather than arbitrarily based on sequence. This work supports the hypothesis presented in 1981 by George Spohr, who originally isolated the Xlsirts, which stated that the highly conserved repetitive elements must be constrained from variability due to some unknown function of the repeats themselves. These studies shed light on the mechanism of RNA localization, linking structure and function. ^

Repeat length and RNA expression level are not primary determinants in CUG expansion toxicity in Drosophila models.

Evidence for an RNA gain-of-function toxicity has now been provided for an increasing number of human pathologies. Myotonic dystrophies (DM) belong to a class of RNA-dominant diseases that result from RNA repeat expansion toxicity. Specifically, DM of type 1 (DM1), is caused by an expansion of CUG repeats in the 3'UTR of the DMPK protein kinase mRNA, while DM of type 2 (DM2) is linked to an expansion of CCUG repeats in an intron of the ZNF9 transcript (ZNF9 encodes a zinc finger protein). In both pathologies the mutant RNA forms nuclear foci. The mechanisms that underlie the RNA pathogenicity seem to be rather complex and not yet completely understood. Here, we describe Drosophila models that might help unravelling the molecular mechanisms of DM1-associated CUG expansion toxicity. We generated transgenic flies that express inducible repeats of different type (CUG or CAG) and length (16, 240, 480 repeats) and then analyzed transgene localization, RNA expression and toxicity as assessed by induced lethality and eye neurodegeneration. The only line that expressed a toxic RNA has a (CTG)(240) insertion. Moreover our analysis shows that its level of expression cannot account for its toxicity. In this line, (CTG)(240.4), the expansion inserted in the first intron of CG9650, a zinc finger protein encoding gene. Interestingly, CG9650 and (CUG)(240.4) expansion RNAs were found in the same nuclear foci. In conclusion, we suggest that the insertion context is the primary determinant for expansion toxicity in Drosophila models. This finding should contribute to the still open debate on the role of the expansions per se in Drosophila and in human pathogenesis of RNA-dominant diseases.

A Cell Biological Determination of Integrator Subunit Localization

Uridine-rich small nuclear (U snRNAs), with the exception of the U6 snRNA, are RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcripts. The mechanism of 3’ cleavage of snRNAs has been unknown until recently. This area was greatly advanced when 12 of the Integrator complex subunits (IntS) were purified in 2005 through their interaction with the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the large subunit (RpbI) of RNAPII. Subsequently, our lab performed a genome-wide RNAi screen that identified two more members of the complex that we have termed IntS13 and IntS14. We have determined that IntS9 and 11 mediate the 3’ cleavage of snRNAs, but the exact function of the other subunits remains unknown. However, through the use of a U7 snRNA-GFP reporter and RNAi knockdown of the Integrator subunits in Drosophila S2 cells, we have shown that all subunits are required for the proper processing of snRNAs, albeit to differing degrees. Because snRNA transcription takes place in the nucleus of the cell, it is expected that all of the Integrator subunits would exhibit nuclear localization, but the knowledge of discrete subnuclear localization (i.e. to Cajal bodies) of any of the subunits could provide important clues to the function of that subunit. In this study, we used a cell biological approach to determine the localization of the 14 Integrator subunits. We hypothesized that the majority of the subunits would be nuclear, however, a few would display distinct localization to the Cajal bodies, as this is where snRNA genes are localized and transcribed. The specific aims and results are: 1. To determine the subcellular localization of the 14 Integrator subunits. To accomplish this, mCherry and GFP tagged clones were generated for each of the 14 Drosophila and human Integrator subunits. Confocal microscopy studies revealed that the majority of the subunits were diffuse in the nucleus, however, IntS3 formed discrete subnuclear foci. Surprisingly, two of the subunits, IntS2 and 7 were observed in cytoplasmic foci. 2. To further characterize Integrator subunits with unique subcellular localizations. Colocalization studies with endogenous IntS3 and Cajal body marker, coilin, showed that these two proteins overlap, and from this we concluded that IntS3 localized to Cajal bodies. Additionally, colocalization studies with mCherry-tagged IntS2 and 7 and the P body marker, Dcp1, revealed that these proteins colocalize as well. IntS7, however, is more stable in cytoplasmic foci than Dcp1. It was also shown through RNAi knockdown of Integrator subunits, that the cytoplasmic localization of IntS2 and 7 is dependent on the expression of IntS1 and 11 in S2 cells.

Ca++/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II: Messenger RNA in developing rat brain

Ca$\sp{++}$/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaM-KII) is highly concentrated in mammalian brain, comprising as much as 2% of the total protein in some regions. In forebrain, CaM-KII has been shown to be enriched in postsynaptic structures where it has been implicated in maintaining cytoskeletal structure, and more recently in signal transduction mechanisms and processes underlying learning and memory. CaM-KII appears to exist as a holoenzyme composed of two related yet distinct subunits, alpha and beta. The ratio of the subunits in the holoenzyme varies with different brain regions and to some degree with subcellular fractions. The two subunits also display distinct developmental profiles. Levels of alpha subunit are not evident at birth but increase dramatically during postnatal development, while levels of beta subunit are readily detected at birth and only gradual increase postnatally. The distinct regional, subcellular and developmental distribution of the two subunits of CaM-KII have prompted us to examine factors involved in regulating the synthesis of the subunit proteins.^ This dissertation addresses the regional and developmental expression of the mRNAs for the individual subunits using in situ hybridization histochemistry and northern slot-blot analysis. By comparing the developmental profile of each mRNA with that of its respective protein, we have determined that initiation of gene transcription is likely the primary site for regulating CaM-KII protein levels. Furthermore, the distinct cytoarchitecture of the hippocampus has allowed us to demonstrate that the alpha, but not beta subunit mRNA is localized in dendrites of certain forebrain neurons. The localization of alpha subunit mRNA at postsynaptic structures, in concert with the accumulation of subunit protein, suggests that dendritic synthesis of CaM-KII alpha subunit may be important for maintaining postsynaptic structure and/or function. ^

LOCALIZATION OF DNA REPAIR FUNCTIONS TO THE NUCLEAR MATRIX

The nucleus of a eukaryotic cell contains both structural and functional elements that contribute to the controlled operation of the cell. In this context, functional components refers to those nuclear constituents that perform metabolic activities such as DNA replication and RNA transcription. Structural nuclear components, designated nuclear matrix, organize the DNA into loops or domains and appear to provide a framework for nuclear DNA organization. However, the boundary between structural and functional components is not clear cut as evinced by reports of associations between metabolic functions and the nuclear matrix. The studies reported here attempt to determine the relationship of another nuclear function, DNA repair, to the nuclear matrix.^ One objective of these studies was to study the initiation of DNA repair by directly measuring the UV-incision activities in human cells and determine the influence of various extractable nuclear components on these activities. The assay for incision activities required the development of a nuclear isolation protocol that produced nuclei with intact DNA; the conformation of the nuclear DNA and its physical characteristics in response to denaturing conditions were determined.^ The nuclei produced with this protocol were then used as substrates for endogenous UV-specific nuclease activities. The isolated nuclei were shown to contain activities that cause breaks in nuclear DNA in response to UV-irradiation. These UV-responsive activities were tightly associated with nuclear components, being unextractable with salt concentration of up to 0.6 M.^ The tight association of the incision activities with salt-extracted nuclei suggested that other repair function might also be associated with salt-stable components of the nucleus. The site of unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) was determined in salt-extracted nuclei (nucleoids) using autoradiography and fluorescent microscopy. UDS was found to occur in association with the nuclear matrix following low-doses (2.55 J/M('2)) of ultraviolet light, but the association became looser after higher doses of ultraviolet light (10-30 J/m('2)). ^

GENETIC INTERACTIONS OF FACTORS THAT REGULATE ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING IN THE MALE GERM LINE OF DROSOPHILA

Alternative RNA splicing is a critical process that contributes variety to protein functions, and further controls cell differentiation and normal development. Although it is known that most eukaryotic genes produce multiple transcripts in which splice site selection is regulated, how RNA binding proteins cooperate to activate and repress specific splice sites is still poorly understood. In addition how the regulation of alternative splicing affects germ cell development is also not well known. In this study, Drosophila Transformer 2 (Tra2) was used as a model to explore both the mechanism of its repressive function on its own pre-mRNA splicing, and the effect of the splicing regulation on spermatogenesis in testis. Half-pint (Hfp), a protein known as splicing activator, was identified in an S2 cell-based RNAi screen as a co-repressor that functions in combination with Tra2 in the splicing repression of the M1 intron. Its repressive splicing function is found to be sequence specific and is dependent on both the weak 3’ splice site and an intronic splicing silencer within the M1 intron. In addition we found that in vivo, two forms of Hfp are expressed in a cell type specific manner. These alternative forms differ at their amino terminus affecting the presence of a region with four RS dipeptides. Using assays in Drosophila S2 cells, we determined that the alternative N terminal domain is necessary in repression. This difference is probably due to differential localization of the two isoforms in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Our in vivo studies show that both Hfp and Tra2 are required for normal spermatogenesis and cooperate in repression of M1 splicing in spermatocytes. But interestingly, Tra2 and Hfp antagonize each other’s function in regulating germline specific alternative splicing of Taf1 (TBP associated factor 1). Genetic and cytological studies showed that mutants of Hfp and Taf1 both cause similar defects in meiosis and spermatogenesis. These results suggest Hfp regulates normal spermatogenesis partially through the regulation of taf1 splicing. These observations indicate that Hfp regulates tra2 and taf1 activity and play an important role in germ cell differentiation of male flies.