Comparing the factorial structure, invariance, and predictive validity of transtheoretical model constructs for alcohol use across restricted and unrestricted settings

With substance abuse treatment expanding in prisons and jails, understanding how behavior change interacts with a restricted setting becomes more essential. The Transtheoretical Model (TTM) has been used to understand intentional behavior change in unrestricted settings, however, evidence indicates restrictive settings can affect the measurement and structure of the TTM constructs. The present study examined data from problem drinkers at baseline and end-of-treatment from three studies: (1) Project CARE (n = 187) recruited inmates from a large county jail; (2) Project Check-In (n = 116) recruited inmates from a state prison; (3) Project MATCH, a large multi-site alcohol study had two recruitment arms, aftercare (n = 724 pre-treatment and 650 post-treatment) and outpatient (n = 912 pre-treatment and 844 post-treatment). The analyses were conducted using cross-sectional data to test for non-invariance of measures of the TTM constructs: readiness, confidence, temptation, and processes of change (Structural Equation Modeling, SEM) across restricted and unrestricted settings. Two restricted (jail and aftercare) and one unrestricted group (outpatient) entering treatment and one restricted (prison) and two unrestricted groups (aftercare and outpatient) at end-of-treatment were contrasted. In addition TTM end-of-treatment profiles were tested as predictors of 12 month drinking outcomes (Profile Analysis). Although SEM did not indicate structural differences in the overall TTM construct model across setting types, there were factor structure differences on the confidence and temptation constructs at pre-treatment and in the factor structure of the behavioral processes at the end-of-treatment. For pre-treatment temptation and confidence, differences were found in the social situations factor loadings and in the variance for the confidence and temptation latent factors. For the end-of-treatment behavioral processes, differences across the restricted and unrestricted settings were identified in the counter-conditioning and stimulus control factor loadings. The TTM end-of-treatment profiles were not predictive of drinking outcomes in the prison sample. Both pre and post-treatment differences in structure across setting types involved constructs operationalized with behaviors that are limited for those in restricted settings. These studies suggest the TTM is a viable model for explicating addictive behavior change in restricted settings but calls for modification of subscale items that refer to specific behaviors and caution in interpreting the mean differences across setting types for problem drinkers. ^

Structure and biosynthesis of a pyruvate -dependent enzyme---phosphatidylserine decarboxylase from {\it Escherichia coli\/}

Phosphatidylserine decarboxylase of E. coli, a cytoplasmic membrane protein, catalyzes the formation of phosphatidylethanolamine, the principal phospholipid of the organism. The activity of the enzyme is dependent on a covalently bound pyruvate (Satre and Kennedy (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 479-483). This study shows that the enzyme consists of two nonidentical subunits, $\alpha$ (Mr = 7,332) and $\beta$ (Mr = 28,579), with the pyruvate prosthetic group in amide linkage to the amino-terminus of the $\alpha$ subunit. Partial protein sequence and DNA sequence analysis reveal that the two subunits are derived from a proenzyme ($\pi$ subunit, Mr = 35,893) through a post-translational event. During the conversion of the proenzyme to the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ subunits, the peptide bond between Gly253-Ser254 is cleaved, and Ser254 is converted to the pyruvate prosthetic group at the amino-terminus of the $\alpha$ subunit (Li and Dowhan (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 11516-11522).^ The proenzyme cannot be detected in cells carrying either single or multiple copies of the gene (psd), but can be observed in a T7 RNA polymerase/promoter and transcription-translation system. The cleavage of the wild-type proenzyme occurs rapidly with a half-time on the order of 2 min. Changing of the Ser254 to cysteine (S254C) or threonine (S254T) slows the cleavage rate dramatically and results in mutants with a half-time for processing of around 2-4 h. Change of the Ser254 to alanine (S254A) blocks the cleavage of the proenzyme. The reduced processing rate with the mutations of the proenzyme is consistent with less of the functional enzyme being made. Mutants S254C and S254T produce $\sim$15% and $\sim$1%, respectively, of the activity of the wild-type allele, but can still complement a temperature-sensitive mutant of the psd locus. Neither detectable activity nor complementation is observed by mutant S254A. These results are consistent with the hydroxyl-group of the Ser254 playing a critical role in the cleavage of the peptide bond Gly253-Ser254 of the pro-phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, and support the mechanism proposed by Snell and co-workers (Recsei and Snell (1984) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53, 357-387) for the formation of the prosthetic group of pyruvate-dependent decarboxylases. ^