Measuring the quality of life of patients with diabetes: Validating the tool and determining the effects on quality of life

There are several tools for measuring quality of life (QoL) and specifically, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for persons with diabetes. A commonly-used measure, the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) Survey, developed for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), has been used in several experimental settings, and its reliability and validity are well-established. However, it is considered too long to be of practical use in clinical settings. Because of this, a shortened version of the tool was used recently in the Community Diabetes Education (CoDE) Project in Dallas, Texas, a clinic-based patient education program that uses a specially-trained community healthcare worker to provide patient education. However, the modified scale has never been tested for reliability and validity. Thus, one goal of this thesis was to measure these psychometric properties of the scale. After establishing the reliability and validity, the results of the scale were analyzed to determine the effects of the intervention on the subjects’ quality of life. The changes in QoL scales were compared with changes in physiologic measures which are most closely allied with diabetes, including blood glucose levels, weight/BMI, co-morbidities and health beliefs in order to determine if there is a relationship between such measures and quality of life. The results of the reliability and validity testing were not conclusive. Measures of reliability and criterion validity were established, but these contrasted with poor measures of repeatability and content validity. The effect of the intervention on quality of life, however, was more significant, particularly regarding the impact of diabetes. Those who received the counseling had significantly higher scores on the Impact scale than those who did not, and the former group had much greater improvement in scores over the twelve month period than the latter group. ^

The impact of antibiotic associated diarrhea on health related quality of life in hospitalized patients

Objective. To determine the impact of antibiotic associated diarrhea (AAD) on health related quality of life (HRQOL) in hospitalized patients compared to matched controls without diarrhea. ^ Methods. This is a hospital-based, matched case-control study using secondary data from a prospective cohort trial of patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. One hundred and seventy-eight patients were recruited of whom 18 (10%) reported having antibiotic associated diarrhea. Two non-diarrhea controls were selected for each case with diarrhea giving a final sample of 18 cases and 36 controls. Responses from Short Form (SF) 36 questionnaire were aggregated into eight domains including physical functioning (PF), role-functioning physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), social functioning (SF), vitality (VT), role-functioning emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The eight domains were compared between cases and controls. A GI targeted HRQOL measure was administered to 13 patients with AAD. Responses from the disease-specific instrument were combined in eight subscale scores: dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, food avoidance, social reaction, sex, and relationships. ^ Results. The sample consisted of 41 females (75.9%) and 13 males (24.1%) aged 53.5 ± 14.4 years (range: 21-76 years). Twenty five patients (46%) were Caucasian, 15 (27%) were African American, 13(24%) were Hispanic and 1(2%) was Asian. In univariate analysis, no significant differences in quality of life outcomes were observed in each of the SF36 domains between the case patients and matched controls. There were trends for decreased scores on the role-functioning physical, bodily pain, general health, social functioning, mental health, and mental summary domains. In total, 7 of 8 domain scores were lower in patients with AAD and 5 of 8 domain scores were lower by more than 5 points (considered clinically significant). Controlling for age, patients with antibiotic associated diarrhea had significantly lower general health, vitality, and mental health scale scores (p<0.05 each). The disease-specific scores were significantly lower in patients with AAD than those in published norms for irritable bowel syndrome patients. ^ Conclusion. In this small sample, several areas of decreased QOL in patients with AAD compared to matched controls were noted. A larger sample size to validate these results is necessary.^

The role of a nursing home administrator's education in influencing quality of care in US nursing homes

Nursing home literature links poor management practices to poor quality of care and resident outcomes. Since Nursing Home Administrators (NHAs) require an array of skills to perform their role, it is important to explore what makes a NHA effective. This research fills a gap in the literature and provides a possible option to improve the quality of care in nursing homes. Purpose of the study. The study examines whether NHAs with advanced education (defined as a Masters degree or more) are associated with better quality of care in licensed nursing homes (NHs). Design and Methods. Data was derived from the CDC’s 2004 National Nursing Home Survey, which is a representative sample of NHs across the US. A Donabedian- inspired structure-process-outcomes study model was created to explain how education relates to quality of care. Quality of care was defined as onsite oral care, employee influenza vaccination rates and staff recognition programs. Statistical analyses included multivariate logistic regression; covariates included facility-level variables used in similar peer-reviewed research but also included select measures from the Area Resource File to control for county-level factors. Results. Descriptive and analytical analyses confirm that NHAs with a Bachelor’s degree, Associate degree or high school diploma perform less well than NHAs with a Masters degree or more. NHAs with advanced education are more likely to have onsite dental care and recognition programs for staff than NHAs with a Bachelor’s degree (or less). Also NHAs with less than graduate education are more likely to provide off-site dental care. Employee vaccination rates are not impacted by education. Adding certification, tenure or years of experience to a NHA with advanced education gives them an advantage. In fact, certification and experience alone do not have a positive relationship to care indicators; however adding these to advanced education produces a significant result. Implications. This research provides preliminary evidence that advanced education for the NHA is associated with better quality of care. If future research can confirm these findings, there is merit in revisiting the qualifications. Education can be a legitimate option to support quality improvement efforts in US nursing homes. ^