Why is asthma mortality higher in Puerto Ricans?

Asthma is a significant public health issue and the most common chronic disease in children. The disease burden of asthma is rising around the world and especially in certain populations. In the United States Puerto Rican Americans have the highest rates of mortality due to asthma, while Mexico Americans have the lowest asthma mortality in the U.S. The reasons for this have been the cause of much speculation in the past; however, no clear cause for these differences has been recognized. The present work reviews the literature bearing on this question to show that there are good reasons to believe that individuals with unusually responsive innate immune responses may be predisposed to the development of asthma. Also reviewed is the molecular basis for this connection. The evidence shows that the history and anthropology of the Puerto Rican people is quite different from that of any other surviving North American or Caribbean population, as it was a relatively isolated island population for 400 years with an environment that tended to eliminate individuals with weak innate immune systems. The Puerto Rican population successfully survived the Columbian exchange of microbes but may be poorly adapted to the modern pro-inflammatory diet coupled with exposure to cigarette smoke as well as cockroach and house dust mite feces.^

Health disparities between the United States mainland and Puerto Rico, Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands (United States territories)

Health disparities have been documented for the United States mainland. No literature was found comparing the mainland population to that of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands (United States territories). Using Healthy Lifestyle Characteristics of non-smoking, maintaining a healthy weight, consuming fruits/vegetables daily, and exercising regularly, the health of the mainland was compared to United States territories. The research questions were: (1) Among the characteristics, what are similarities/differences between citizens of the mainland United States and territories?, (2) Among the characteristics, what are similarities/differences in how the territories compare to each other?, (3) Does the mainland and the territories meet Healthy People 2010 goals for these characteristics?, (4) Are perceptions of health concordant or discordant with the characteristics for mainlanders and Puerto Ricans? ^ Using 2007 data from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), frequency distributions were compared for the Healthy Lifestyle Characteristics for the mainland territories. Research found smoking rates on Guam were statistically greater than the mainland, Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands. Healthy body mass index levels and physical activity rates were better on Guam compared to other locations. Puerto Rico had significantly more overweight and obese persons, lower fruit/vegetable consumption rates, and lower physical activity rates than the mainland, Guam and the Virgin Islands. Research found mainlanders reported statistically greater participation in regular physical activity than did Puerto Ricans and Virgin Islanders; there were significant differences in fruit/vegetable consumption rates compared to both. The research found no locations met all four of Healthy People 2010 goals. Compared to mainlanders, research showed Puerto Ricans perceive their health significantly worse.^ A better understanding is needed for how United States citizens (mainlanders and territory residents) view participation in healthy behaviors and how health is affected by participating or not in healthy behaviors. For the year examined, Healthy People 2010 goals were not achieved. This study demonstrates Puerto Ricans’ health, using the four characteristics, is significantly worse than residents in the other locations. Public health programs targeting Puerto Ricans are warranted. Finally, this study highlights the need for continued research on the relationships among the mainland and territories.^

POPULATION ASSESSMENTS OF INFECTION WITH SCHISTOSOMA MANSONI: EFFECTS OF BIAS CAUSED BY THE RELATIVE SENSITIVITY OF DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES (PUERTO RICO)

This study establishes the extent and relevance of bias of population estimates of prevalence, incidence, and intensity of infection with Schistosoma mansoni caused by the relative sensitivity of stool examination techniques. The population studied was Parcelas de Boqueron in Las Piedras, Puerto Rico, where the Centers for Disease Control, had undertaken a prospective community-based study of infection with S. mansoni in 1972. During each January of the succeeding years stool specimens from this population were processed according to the modified Ritchie concentration (MRC) technique. During January 1979 additional stool specimens were collected from 30 individuals selected on the basis of their mean S. mansoni egg output during previous years. Each specimen was divided into ten 1-gm aliquots and three 42-mg aliquots. The relationship of egg counts obtained with the Kato-Katz (KK) thick smear technique as a function of the mean of ten counts obtained with the MRC technique was established by means of regression analysis. Additionally, the effect of fecal sample size and egg excretion level on technique sensitivity was evaluated during a blind assessment of single stool specimen samples, using both examination methods, from 125 residents with documented S. mansoni infections. The regression equation was: Ln KK = 2.3324 + 0.6319 Ln MRC, and the coefficient of determination (r('2)) was 0.73. The regression equation was then utilized to correct the term "m" for sample size in the expression P ((GREATERTHEQ) 1 egg) = 1 - e('-ms), which estimates the probability P of finding at least one egg as a function of the mean S. mansoni egg output "m" of the population and the effective stool sample size "s" utilized by the coprological technique. This algorithm closely approximated the observed sensitivity of the KK and MRC tests when these were utilized to blindly screen a population of known parasitologic status for infection with S. mansoni. In addition, the algorithm was utilized to adjust the apparent prevalence of infection for the degree of functional sensitivity exhibited by the diagnostic test. This permitted the estimation of true prevalence of infection and, hence, a means for correcting estimates of incidence of infection. ^

The epidemiology of dengue among children less than 18 months of age in Puerto Rico, 1999--2011

Between 1999 and 2011, 4,178 suspected dengue cases in children less than 18 months of age were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Dengue Branch in Puerto Rico. Of the 4,178, 813 were determined to be laboratory-positive and 737 laboratory-negative. Those remaining were either laboratory-indeterminate, not processed or positive for Leptospira . On average, 63 laboratory-positive cases were reported per year. Laboratory-positive cases had a median age of 8.5 months. Among these cases, the median age for those with dengue fever was 8.7 months and 7.9 months for dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clinical signs and symptoms indicative of dengue were greatest among laboratory-positive cases and included fever, rash, thrombocytopenia, bleeding manifestations, and petechiae. The most common symptoms among patients who were laboratory-negative were fever, nasal congestion, cough, diarrhea, and vomiting. Using the 1997 WHO guidelines, nearly 50% of the laboratory-positive cases met the case definition for dengue fever, and 61 of these were further determined to meet the case definition for dengue hemorrhagic fever. In comparison, 15% of laboratory-negative cases met the case definition for dengue fever and less than 1% for dengue hemorrhagic fever. None of the laboratory-positive or laboratory-negative cases met the criteria for dengue shock syndrome.^