The diagnostic value of a 12-lead electrocardiogram in patients with cardiac tamponade due to a malignant pericardial effusion

Background. Cardiac tamponade can occur when a large amount of fluid, gas, singly or in combination, accumulating within the pericardium, compresses the heart causing circulatory compromise. Although previous investigators have found the 12-lead ECG to have a poor predictive value in diagnosing cardiac tamponade, very few studies have evaluated it as a follow up tool for ruling in or ruling out tamponade in patients with previously diagnosed malignant pericardial effusions. ^ Methods. 127 patients with malignant pericardial effusions at the MD Anderson Cancer Center were included in this retrospective study. While 83 of these patients had a cardiac tamponade diagnosed by echocardiographic criteria (Gold standard), 44 did not. We computed the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for individual and combinations of ECG abnormalities. Individual ECG abnormalities were also entered singly into a univariate logistic regression model to predict tamponade. ^ Results. For patients with effusions of all sizes, electrical alternans had a Se, Sp, PPV and NPV of 22.61%, 97.61%, 95% and 39.25% respectively. These parameters for low voltage complexes were 55.95%, 74.44%, 81.03%, 46.37% respectively. The presence of all three ECG abnormalities had a Se = 8.33%, Sp = 100%, PPV = 100% and NPV = 35.83% while the presence of at least one of the three ECG abnormalities had a Se = 89.28%, Sp = 46.51%, PPV = 76.53%, NPV = 68.96%. For patients with effusions of all sizes electrical alternans had an OR of 12.28 (1.58–95.17, p = 0.016), while the presence of at least one ECG abnormality had an OR of 7.25 (2.9–18.1, p = 0.000) in predicting tamponade. ^ Conclusions. Although individual ECG abnormalities had low sensitivities, specificities, NPVs and PPVs with the exception of electrical alternans, the presence of at least one of the three ECG abnormalities had a high sensitivity in diagnosing cardiac tamponade. This could point to its potential use as a screening test with a correspondingly high NPV to rule out a diagnosis of tamponade in patients with malignant pericardial effusions. This could save expensive echocardiographic assessments in patients with previously diagnosed pericardial effusions. ^

Persistently elevated troponin I in heart failure patients - a suitable prognosticator and a possible boon to public health?

Baseline elevation of troponin I (TnI) has been associated with worse outcomes in heart failure (HF). However, the prevalence of persistent TnI elevation and its association with clinical outcomes has not been well described. HF is a major public health issue due to its wide prevalence and prognosticators of this condition will have a significant impact on public health. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 510 patients with an initial HF admission between 2002 to 2004, and all subsequent hospital admissions up to May 2009 were recorded in a de-identified database. Persistent TnI elevation was defined as a level ≥0.05 ng/ml on ≥3 HF admissions. Baseline characteristics, hospital readmissions and all cause mortality were compared between patients with persistent TnI elevation (Persistent), patients with no persistence of TnI (Nonpersistent) and patients who had less than three hospital admissions (admission <3) groups. Also the same data was analyzed using the mean method in which the mean value of all recorded troponin values of each patient was used to define persistence i.e. patients who had a mean troponin level ≥0.05 ng/ml were classified as persistent. Results: Mean age of our cohort was 68.4 years out of which 99.6% subjects were male, 62.4% had ischemic HF. 78.2% had NYHA class III to IV HF, mean LVEF was 25.9%. Persistent elevation of TnI was seen in 26% of the cohort and in 66% of patients with more than 3 hospital admissions. Mean TnI level was 0.67 ± 0.15 ng/ml in the 'Persistent' group. Mean TnI using the mean method was 1.11 ± 7.25 ng/ml. LVEF was significantly lower in persistent group. Hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal insufficiency and mean age did not differ between the two groups. 'Persistent' patients had higher mortality (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.89–1.78, p = 0.199 when unadjusted and HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.89–1.86, p = 0.176 when adjusted for race, LVEF and ischemic etiology) HR for mortality in persistent patients was 1.99 (95% CI = 1.06–3.73, p = 0.03) using the mean method. The following results were found in those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR = 1.44034, 95% CI = 0.92–2.26, p = 0.113) and (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.01–3.55, p = 0.046) by using the mean method. 2 out of three patients with HF who were readmitted three or more times had persistent elevation of troponin I levels. Patients with chronic persistence of troponin I elevation showed a trend towards lesser survival as compared to patients who did not have chronic persistence, however this did not reach statistical significance. This trend was seen more among ischemic patients than non ischemic patients, but did not reach statistical significance. With the mean method, patients with chronic persistence of troponin I elevation had significantly lesser survival than those without it. Also ischemic patients had significantly lesser survival than non ischemic patients. ^

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: A policy analysis of restricting foods with minimal nutritional value

In 2011, expenditures for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reached an all-time high of $72 billion. The goal of SNAP is " to alleviate hunger and malnutrition…by increasing food purchasing power for all eligible households who apply for participation." It has been well established that proper nutrition is essential to good health, making SNAP an important program to public health consumers. Thus, this analysis examined whether SNAP is meeting its stated goal and whether the goal would be reduced if the purchase of foods of minimal nutritional value (FMNV) were restricted. ^ A review of existing literature found that SNAP has been shown to alleviate hunger, but the studies on the nutritional impact of the program were not sufficient to assert whether change is needed. When considering whether limiting FMNV would reduce or improve the effectiveness of SNAP at alleviating hunger and malnutrition, there is very little information on which to base a policy change, particular one that singles out a low income group to restrict purchases. ^ Several states have attempted to restrict the purchase of FMNV but, to date, no such change has been implemented or tested. Conducting pilot studies on the restriction of FMNV, along with better data collection on SNAP purchases, would guide policy changes to the program. Although there are many potential public health benefits to restricting FMNV purchase using SNAP dollars, research is needed to quantify the cost impact of these benefits.^