Screening of gap junction antagonists on dye coupling in the rabbit retina.

Many cell types in the retina are coupled via gap junctions and so there is a pressing need for a potent and reversible gap junction antagonist. We screened a series of potential gap junction antagonists by evaluating their effects on dye coupling in the network of A-type horizontal cells. We evaluated the following compounds: meclofenamic acid (MFA), mefloquine, 2-aminoethyldiphenyl borate (2-APB), 18-alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid, 18-beta-glycyrrhetinic acid (18-beta-GA), retinoic acid, flufenamic acid, niflumic acid, and carbenoxolone. The efficacy of each drug was determined by measuring the diffusion coefficient for Neurobiotin (Mills & Massey, 1998). MFA, 18-beta-GA, 2-APB and mefloquine were the most effective antagonists, completely eliminating A-type horizontal cell coupling at a concentration of 200 muM. Niflumic acid, flufenamic acid, and carbenoxolone were less potent. Additionally, carbenoxolone was difficult to wash out and also may be harmful, as the retina became opaque and swollen. MFA, 18-beta-GA, 2-APB and mefloquine also blocked coupling in B-type horizontal cells and AII amacrine cells. Because these cell types express different connexins, this suggests that the antagonists were relatively non-selective across several different types of gap junction. It should be emphasized that MFA was water-soluble and its effects on dye coupling were easily reversible. In contrast, the other gap junction antagonists, except carbenoxolone, required DMSO to make stock solutions and were difficult to wash out of the preparation at the doses required to block coupling in A-type HCs. The combination of potency, water solubility and reversibility suggest that MFA may be a useful compound to manipulate gap junction coupling.

Studies on regulation of skeletal muscle differentiation by growth factors

Skeletal muscle differentiation involves sequential events in which proliferating undifferentiated myoblasts withdraw from the cell cycle and fuse to form multinucleated myotubes. The process of fusion is accompanied by the disappearance of proteins associated with cell proliferation and the coordinate induction of a battery of muscle-specific gene products, which includes the muscle isoenzyme of creatine kinase, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, and contractile proteins such as alpha-actin. The molecular events associated with myogenesis are particularly amenable to experimental analysis because the events which occur in vivo can be recapitulated in vitro using established muscle cell lines. Initiation of myogenic differentiation in vitro can be achieved by removing serum from the culture medium. Myogenesis, therefore, can be considered to be regulated through a repression-type of mechanism by components in serum. The objectives of this project were to identify the components involved in regulation of myogenesis and approach the mechanism(s) whereby these components achieve their regulatory function. Initially, the effects of a series of polypeptide growth factors on myogenesis were examined. Among them TGF$\beta$ and FGF were found to be potent inhibitors of myogenic differentiation which did not affect cell proliferation. The inhibitory effects of these growth factors on differentiation requires their persistent presence in the culture medium. After myoblasts have undergone fusion, they become refractory to the inhibitory effects of TGF$\beta$, FGF, and serum. When fusion is inhibited by the presence of EGTA, a Ca$\sp{2+}$ chelator, muscle-specific genes are expressed reversibly upon removal of inhibitory growth factors. Subsequent exposure of biochemically differentiated cells to serum or TGF$\beta$ leads to down-regulation of muscle-specific genes. Stimulation with serum also leads to reentry of myocytes into the cell cycle, whereas fused myotubes are irreversibly and terminally differentiated. Measurement of levels of TGF$\beta$ receptors reveals that under non-fusing conditions, TGF$\beta$ receptor levels in biochemically differentiated myocytes remained as high as in undifferentiated myoblasts, while during terminal differentiation, TGF$\beta$ receptors decreased at least five-fold. Thus, down-regulation of TGF$\beta$ receptors is coupled to irreversible differentiation, but not reversible differentiation in the absence of fusion. The possible involvement of second messenger systems, such as cAMP and protein kinase C, in the pathway(s) by which TGF$\beta$, FGF, or serum factors transduce their signals from the cell surface to the nucleus was also examined. The results showed that myogenic differentiation is subject to negative regulation through cAMP elevation-dependent and cAMP elevation-independent pathways and that serum mitogens, TGF$\beta$ and FGF inhibit differentiation through a mechanism independent of cAMP-elevation or protein kinase C activation. ^

STAT3 activation by the ErbB2 receptor and development of peptide-based STAT3 inhibitors

Stats (s&barbelow;ignal t&barbelow;ransducer and a&barbelow;ctivator of t&barbelow;ranscription) are latent transcription factors that translocate from the cytoplasm to nucleus. Constitutive activation of Stat3α by upstream oncoproteins and receptor tyrosine kinases has been found in many human tumors and tumor-derived cell lines and it is often correlated with the activation of ErbB-2. In order to explore the involvement of ErbB-2 in the activation of Stat3 and the mechanisms underlying this event, an erbB-2 point mutant was used as a model of a constitutively activated receptor. Phenylalanine mutations (Y-F) were made in the receptor's autophosphorylation sites and their ability to activate Stat3α was evaluated. Our results suggest that Stat3α and Janus tyrosine kinase 2 associates with ErbB-2 prior to tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor and that full activation of Stat3α by ErbB-2 requires the participation of other non-receptor tyrosine kinases. Both Src and Jak2 kinases contribute to the activation of Stat3α while only Src binds to ErbB-2 only when the receptor is tyrosine phosphorylated. Our results also suggest that tyrosine 1139 may be important for Src SH2 domain association since a mutant lacking this tyrosine reduces the ability of the Src SH2 domain to bind to ErbB-2 and significantly decreases its ability to activate Stat3α. ^ In order to disrupt aberrant STAT3α activation which contributes to tumorigenesis, we sought small molecules which can specifically bind to the STAT3 SH2 domain, thereby abolishing its ability of being recruited into receptors, and also blocking the dimer formation required for STAT3α activation. A phosphopeptide derived from gp130 was found to have a high affinity to STAT3 SH2 domain, and we decided to use this peptide as the base for further modifications. A series of peptide based compounds were designed and tested using electrophoretic mobility shift assay and fluorescence polarization assay to evaluate their affinity to the STAT3 SH2 domain. Two promising compounds, DRIV-73C and BisPOM, were used for blocking STAT3α activity in cell culture. Either can successfully impair STAT3α activation induced by IL-6 stimulation in HepG2 cells. BisPOM proved to be the more effective in blocking STAT3α tyrosine phosphorylation in induced cells and tumor cell lines, and was the more potent in inhibiting STAT3 dependent cell growth. ^

Development and Characterization of Novel Ras Inhibitors

Ras genes are mutated in 15% of human cancers. Ras GTPases operate as molecular switches regulating cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The three main isoforms of Ras – H-Ras, K-Ras, and N-Ras – inhabit distinct nanodomains of the plasma membrane and intracellular compartments including the Golgi. However, the role of single endogenous Ras isoforms on these compartments remains unclear as most studies have utilized ectopically expressed and mutant forms of Ras proteins. In an effort to develop novel tools that will allow us to abrogate individual endogenous Ras isoforms, we targeted the catalytic domain of p120RasGAP to the plasma membrane with the hypervariable region (HVR) of H-Ras (GAP-CTH) or K-Ras (GAP-CTK) and to the Golgi using the HVR of H-Ras with insertion of a point mutation (GAP-CTH181S). We performed GST-RBD pull-downs on cells expressing each GAP construct and stimulated with epidermal growth factor (EGF). We found that GAP-CTH and GAP-CTK specifically inhibited H-Ras or K-Ras, respectively. However, we did not detect any effect of GAP-CTH181S on Ras activation. Additionally, we used confocal microscopy to verify the ability of GAP constructs to abrogate Ras activation in distinct sub-cellular compartments. We found that GAP-CTH inhibits H-Ras activation on the plasma membrane, while GAP-CTK inhibits K-Ras activation on the plasma membrane. On the contrary, GAP-CTH181S inhibited H-Ras activation on the Golgi. We also analyzed the effects of these GAP constructs on the activation of ERK and Akt in response to EGF stimulation. We found that EGF stimulation of the MAPK pathway was inhibited by GAP-CTK but none of the other GAP constructs, while Akt activation was not inhibited by any GAP construct. Finally, we assayed cellular proliferation and differentiation. We found that GAP-CTK and GAP-CTH were equipotent inhibitors of cellular growth, whereas GAP-CTH181S was less potent. We also found that GAP-CTK and GAP-CTH inhibited differentiation with similar potency, while GAP-CTH181S was more potent. This approach may be adapted to investigate any Ras-dependent signaling pathway. Therefore, it has the potential to become a powerful tool for studying Ras isoform-specific signaling outputs.