1 resultado para Physician-assisted Suicide
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (18)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (10)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (59)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (54)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (4)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (111)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (13)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (108)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (11)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (140)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (137)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (33)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (10)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (7)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (18)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (20)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (4)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The "EMR Tutorial" is designed to be a bilingual online physician education environment about electronic medical records. After iterative assessment and redesign, the tutorial was tested in two groups: U.S. physicians and Mexican medical students. Split-plot ANOVA revealed significantly different pre-test scores in the two groups, significant cognitive gains for the two groups overall, and no significant difference in the gains made by the two groups. Users rated the module positively on a satisfaction questionnaire.