Pharmacological characterization of nipecotic acid ethyl ester: A novel cholinergic muscarinic agonist

The aim of this dissertation was to examine the hypothesis that (R)-nipecotic acid ethyl ester ((R)-NAEE) is a cholinergic agonist that is selective for a particular subclass (M$\sb1$ or M$\sb2$) of muscarinic receptors.^ Ligand binding studies indicated that like cholinergic agonists (R)-NAEE selectively interacts with rat heart (M$\sb2$) and brain (M$\sb1$) muscarinic binding sites. Physiological studies revealed that unlike cholinergic agonists (R)-NAEE stimulated only those responses coupled to M$\sb2$ muscarinic receptors (acid secretion, negative inotropic response, smooth muscle contraction). Moreover, in rat brain (R)-NAEE differentiated between M$\sb2$ receptors negatively coupled to adenylate cyclase activity and M$\sb1$ receptors mediating PI turnover, being a weak competitive antagonist at these latter sites. In isolated rat gastric mucosal cells (R)-NAEE also differentiated between two M$\sb2$ coupled responses where it potentiated acid secretion but could not stimulate PI turnover. Atropine, a selective antimuscarinic agent, competitively antagonized all agonist effects of (R)-NAEE.^ Unlike (R)-NAEE, the muscarinic agonist arecoline, which is structurally similar to (R)-NAEE, stimulates both M$\sb1$ and M$\sb2$ receptors. Structure activity studies revealed that saturation of the piperidine ring and the length of the ester side chain of (R)-NAEE are the most important determinants for both M$\sb2$ efficacy and selectivity.^ The results of this dissertation establish that (R)-NAEE is a cholinergic muscarinic receptor agonist that displays greater efficacy at M$\sb2$ than at M$\sb1$ receptors, being a weak antagonist at the M$\sb1$ site. With such selectivity, (R)-NAEE may be regarded as a prototype for a unique class of cholinergic muscarinic M$\sb2$ receptor agonists. Because of these unique properties, (R)-NAEE should be useful in the further characterization of muscarinic receptors, and could lead to the development of a new class of therapeutic agents. ^

Characterization of the interactions between two sites of plasticity engaged during eyelid conditioning

Here, we investigate the involvement of two sites of plasticity in the learning and expression of a simple associative motor behavior—the classically conditioned eyelid response. While previous studies clearly demonstrate that lesions of the anterior interpositus nucleus of the cerebellum abolish learned responses and prevent subsequent learning, studies investigating the effects of lesions of the cerebellar cortex on learning and retention have produced discrepant results. We complement ablative lesion studies of the cortex with the use of reversible, pharmacological blockade of cerebellar cortical transmission to investigate the role of the cerebellar cortex in eyelid conditioning. We demonstrate that both pharmacological blockade as well as focused ablative lesions of the cortex abolish timed responses and unmask responses with a fixed, short latency that are not displayed by the intact animal. Pharmacological blockade of cerebellar cortex output at various stages of acquisition and extinction reveals appropriate, learning dependent changes in the amplitude and probability of short latency responses during training. Acquisition of both short latency as well as timed responses is prevented by ablative lesions of the anterior lobe of the cerebellar cortex. These convergent results from technically distinct methods of removing the influence of the cerebellar cortex from conditioned behavior are consistent with the proposal that (1) eyelid conditioning engages two cerebellar sites of plasticity-one in the cortex and one in the anterior interpositus nucleus, (2) plasticity in the cerebellar cortex is necessary for proper response timing, (3) plasticity in the nucleus mediates the short latency responses unmasked by lesions of the cerebellar cortex, and (4) cerebellar cortical output is necessary for the induction of plasticity in the nucleus. ^