Poly(A)-binding protein-interacting protein 1 binds to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 to stimulate translation.

Poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) stimulates translation initiation by binding simultaneously to the mRNA poly(A) tail and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G). PABP activity is regulated by PABP-interacting (Paip) proteins. Paip1 binds PABP and stimulates translation by an unknown mechanism. Here, we describe the interaction between Paip1 and eIF3, which is direct, RNA independent, and mediated via the eIF3g (p44) subunit. Stimulation of translation by Paip1 in vivo was decreased upon deletion of the N-terminal sequence containing the eIF3-binding domain and upon silencing of PABP or several eIF3 subunits. We also show the formation of ternary complexes composed of Paip1-PABP-eIF4G and Paip1-eIF3-eIF4G. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the eIF3-Paip1 interaction promotes translation. We propose that eIF3-Paip1 stabilizes the interaction between PABP and eIF4G, which brings about the circularization of the mRNA.

c-{\it mos\/} RNA expression in somatic cells and its physiological significance in cell cycle progression

The c-mos proto-oncogene, which is expressed at relatively high levels in male and female germ cells, plays a key role in oocyte meiotic maturation. The c-mos gene product in oocytes (p39$\sp{\rm c-mos}$) is necessary and sufficient to initiate meiosis. p39$\sp{\rm c-mos}$ is also an essential component of the cytostatic factor, which is responsible for arresting vertebrate oocytes at the second meiotic metaphase by stabilizing the maturation promoting factor (MPF). MPF is a universal regulator of both meiosis and mitosis. Much less is understood about c-mos expression and function in somatic cells. In addition to gonadal tissues, c-Mos has been detected in some somatic tissues and non-germ cell lines including NIH 3T3 cells as a protein termed p43$\sp{\rm c-mos}$. Since c-mos RNA transcripts were not previously detected in this cell line by Northern blot or S1 protection analyses, a search was made for c-mos RNA in NIH 3T3 cells. c-mos transcripts were detected using the highly sensitive RNA-PCR method and RNase protection assays. Furthermore, cell cycle analyses indicated that expression of c-mos RNA is tightly controlled in a cell cycle dependent manner with highest levels of transcripts (approximately 5 copies/cell) during the G2 phase.^ In order to determine the physiological significance of c-mos RNA expression in somatic cells, antisense mos was placed under the control of an inducible promoter and introduced into either NIH 3T3 cells or C2 cells. It was found that a basal level of expression of antisense mos resulted in interference with mitotic progression and growth arrest. Several nuclear abnormalities were observed, especially the appearance of binucleated and multinucleated cells as well as the extrusion of microvesicles containing cellular material. These results indicate that antisense mos expression results in a block in cytokinesis. In summary, these results establish that c-mos expression is not restricted to germ cells, but instead indicate that c-mos RNA expression occurs during the G2 stage of the cell cycle. Furthermore, these studies demonstrate that the c-mos proto-oncogene plays an important role in cell cycle progression. As in meiosis, c-mos may have a similar but not identical function in regulating cell cycle events in somatic cells, particularly in controlling mitotic progression via activation/stabilization of MPF. ^

Mechanism of translationally coupled mRNA turnover mediated by c-fos protein-coding-region determinant

Proto-oncogene c-fos is a member of the class of early-response genes whose transient expression plays a crucial role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Degradation of c- fos mRNA is an important mechanism for controlling c-fos expression. Rapid mRNA turnover mediated by the protein-coding-region determinant (mCRD) of the c-fos transcript illustrates a functional interplay between mRNA turnover and translation that coordinately influences the fate of cytoplasmic mRNA. It is suggested that mCRD communicates with the 3′ poly(A) tail via an mRNP complex comprising mCRD-associated proteins, which prevents deadenylation in the absence of translation. Ribosome transit as a result of translation is required to alter the conformation of the mRNP complex, thereby eliciting accelerated deadenylation and mRNA decay. To gain further insight into the mechanism of mCRD-mediated mRNA turnover, Unr was identified as an mCRD-binding protein, and its binding site within mCRD was characterized. Moreover, the functional role for Unr in mRNA decay was demonstrated. The result showed that elevation of Unr protein level in the cytoplasm led to inhibition of mRNA destabilization by mCRD. In addition, GST pull-down assay and immuno-precipitation analysis revealed that Unr interacted with PABP in an RNA-independent manner, which identified Unr as a novel PABP-interacting protein. Furthermore, the Unr interacting domain in PABP was characterized. In vivo mRNA decay experiments demonstrated a role for Unr-PABP interaction in mCRD-mediated mRNA decay. In conclusion, the findings of this study provide the first evidence that Unr plays a key role in mCRD-mediated mRNA decay. It is proposed that Unr is recruited by mCRD to initiate the formation of a dynamic mRNP complex for communicating with poly(A) tail through PABP. This unique mRNP complex may couple translation to mRNA decay, and perhaps to recruit the responsible nuclease for deadenylation. ^