INCREASED EXPRESSION OF ONE OF TWO ADENOSINE DEAMINASE ALLELES IN A HUMAN CHORIOCARCINOMA CELL LINE FOLLOWING SELECTION WITH ADENINE NUCLEOSIDES

The human choriocarcinoma cell line JEG-3 is heterozygous at the adenosine deaminase (ADA) gene locus. Both allelic genes are under strong but incomplete repression causing a very low level expression of the gene locus. Because cytotoxic adenosine analogues such as 9-(beta)-D arabinofuranosyladenine (ara-A) and 9-(beta)-D xylofuranosyladenine (xyl-A) can be specifically detoxified by the action of ADA, these analogues were used to select for JEG-3 derived cells which had increased ADA expression. When JEG-3 cells were subjected to a multi-step, successively increasing dosage of either ara-A or xyl-A, resistant cells with increased ADA expression were generated. This increased ADA expression in the resistant cells was unstable, so that when the selective pressure was removed, cellular ADA expression would decrease. Subclone analysis of xyl-A resistant cells revealed that compared to parental JEG-3 cells, individual resistant cells had either elevated ADA levels or decreased adenosine kinase (ADK) levels or both. This altered ADA and ADK expression in the resistant cells were found to be independent events. Because of high endogenous tissue conversion factor (TCF) expression in the JEG-3 cells, the allelic nature of the increased ADA expression in most of the resistant cells could not be determined. However, several resistant subcloned cells were found to have lost TCF expression. These TCF('-) cells expressed only the ADA*2 allelic gene product. Cell fusion experiments demonstrated that the ADA*1 allelic gene was intact and functional in the A3-1A7 cell line. Chromosomal analysis of the A3-1A7 cells showed that they had no double-minutes or homogeneously staining chromosomal regions, although a pair of new chromosomes were found in these cells. Segregation analysis of the hybrid cells indicated that an ADA*2 allelic gene was probably located on this new chromosome. The analysis of the A3-1A7 cell line suggested that the expression of only ADA 2 in these cells was the result of possibly a cis-deregulation of the ADA gene locus or more probably an amplification of the ADA*2 allelic gene. Two effective positive selection systems for ADA('+) cells were also developed and tested. These selection systems should eventually lead to the isolation of the ADA gene.^

THE EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT FOR THE GLYCINE SYNTHASE REACTION (ONE-CARBON, METABOLISM, FOLATE)

The equilibrium constant (K(,c)) under physiological conditions (38(DEGREES)C, 0.25 M ionic strength (I), pH 7.0) for the glycine synthase (GS) reaction (E C 2.1.2.1.0) (Equation 1) has been determined. (UNFORMATTED TABLE FOLLOWS)^ 5,10-CH(,2)-H(,4)Folate NADH NH (,4)+ CO(,2) ^ K(,c) = Eq. 1^ H(,4)Folate NAD('+) GLY ^(TABLE ENDS)^ The enzymatic instability of the GS enzyme complex itself has made it necessary to determine the overall K(,c) from the product of constants for the partial reactions of GS determined separately under the same conditions. The partial reactions are the H(,4)Folate-formaldehyde (CH(,2)(OH)(,2)) condensation reaction (Reaction 1) the K(,c) for which has been reported by this laboratory (3.0 x 10('4)), the lipoate (LipS(,2)) dehydrogenase reaction (LipDH) (Reaction 2) and the Gly-Lip^ decarboxylase reaction (Reaction 3) forming reduced lipoate (Lip(SH)(,2)), NH(,4)('+), CO(,2) and CH(,2)(OH)(,2.) (UNFORMATTED TABLE FOLLOWS)(,)^ H(,4)Fote + CH(,2)(OH)(,2) 5,10-CH(,2)-H(,4)Folate (1)^ Lip(SH)(,2) + NAD('+) LipS(,2) + NADH + H('+) (2)^ H('+) + Gly + LipS(,2) Lip(SH)(,2) + NH(,4)('+) CO(,2) + CH(,2)(OH)(,2) (3)^(TABLE ENDS)^ In this work the K(,c) for Reactions 2 and 3 are reported.^ The K(,c)' for the LipDH reaction described by other authors was reported with unexplainable conclusions regarding the pH depend- ence for the reaction. These conclusions would imply otherwise unexpected acid dissociation constants for reduced and oxidized lipoate. The pK(,a)',s for these compounds have been determined to resolve discrepancy. The conclusions are as follows: (1) The K(,c) for the LipDH reaction is 2.08 x 10('-8); (2) The pK(,a)',s for Lip(SH)(,2) are 4.77(-COOH), 9.91(-SH), 11.59(-SH); for LipS(,2) the carboxyl pK(,a)' is 4.77; (3) Contrary to previous literature, the log K(,c)' for the LipDH reaction is a linear function of the pH, a conclusion supported by the values for the dissociation constants.^ The K(,c) for Reaction 3 is the product of constants for Reactions 4-7. (UNFORMATTED TABLE FOLLOWS)^ LipSHSCH(,2)OH + H(,2)O Lip(SH)(,2) + CH(,2)(OH)(,2) (4)^ H(,2)O + LipSHSCH(,2)NH(,3)('+) LipSHSCH(,2)OH + NH(,4)('+) (5)^ LipSHSCH(,2)NH(,2) + H('+) LipSHSCH(,2)NH(,3)('+) (6)^ Gly + LipS(,2) LipSHSCH(,2)NH(,2) + CO(,2) (7)^(TABLE ENDS)^ Reactions 4-6 are non-enzymatic reactions whose constants were determined spectrophotometrically. Reaction 7 was catalyzed by the partially purified P-protein of GS with equilibrium approached from both directions. The value for K(,c) for this reaction is 8.15 x 10('-3). The combined K(,c) for Reactions 4-7 or Reaction 3 is 2.4 M.^ The overall K(,c) for the GS reaction determined by combination of values for Reactions 1-3 is 1.56 x 10('-3). ^