Left ventricular growth from age 8 to 18 and its anthropometric determinants: Longitudinal results from Project Heartbeat!

Left ventricular mass (LVM) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults. However, normal growth of LVM in healthy children is not well understood, and previous results on independent effects of body size and body fatness on LVM have been inconsistent. The purpose of this study was (1) to establish the normal growth curve of LVM from age 8 to age 18, and evaluate the determinants of change in LVM with age, and (2) to assess the independent effects of body size and body fatness on LVM.^ In Project HeartBeat!, 678 healthy children aged 8, 11 and 14 years at baseline were enrolled and examined at 4-monthly intervals for up to 4 years. A synthetic cohort with continuous observations from age 8 to 18 years was constructed. A total of 4608 LVM measurements was made from M-mode echocardiography. The multilevel linear model was used for analysis.^ Sex-specific trajectories of normal growth of LVM from age 8 to 18 was displayed. On average, LVM was 15 g higher in males than females. Average LVM increased linearly in males from 78 g at age 8 to 145 g at age 18. For females, the trajectory was curvilinear, nearly constant after age 14. No significant racial differences were found. After adjustment for the effects of body size and body fatness, average LVM decreased slightly from age 8 to 18, and sex differences in changes of LVM remained constant.^ The impact of body size on LVM was examined by adding to a basic LVM-sex-age model one of 9 body size indicators. The impact of body fatness was tested by further introducing into each of the 9 LVM models (with one or another of the body size indicators) one of 4 body fatness indicators, yielding 36 models with different body size and body fatness combinations. The results indicated that effects of body size on LVM can be distinguished between fat-free body mass and fat body mass, both being independent, positive predictors. The former is the stronger determinant. When a non-fat-free body size indicator is used as predictor, the estimated residual effect of body fatness on LVM becomes negative. ^

THE EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT FOR THE GLYCINE SYNTHASE REACTION (ONE-CARBON, METABOLISM, FOLATE)

The equilibrium constant (K(,c)) under physiological conditions (38(DEGREES)C, 0.25 M ionic strength (I), pH 7.0) for the glycine synthase (GS) reaction (E C 2.1.2.1.0) (Equation 1) has been determined. (UNFORMATTED TABLE FOLLOWS)^ 5,10-CH(,2)-H(,4)Folate NADH NH (,4)+ CO(,2) ^ K(,c) = Eq. 1^ H(,4)Folate NAD('+) GLY ^(TABLE ENDS)^ The enzymatic instability of the GS enzyme complex itself has made it necessary to determine the overall K(,c) from the product of constants for the partial reactions of GS determined separately under the same conditions. The partial reactions are the H(,4)Folate-formaldehyde (CH(,2)(OH)(,2)) condensation reaction (Reaction 1) the K(,c) for which has been reported by this laboratory (3.0 x 10('4)), the lipoate (LipS(,2)) dehydrogenase reaction (LipDH) (Reaction 2) and the Gly-Lip^ decarboxylase reaction (Reaction 3) forming reduced lipoate (Lip(SH)(,2)), NH(,4)('+), CO(,2) and CH(,2)(OH)(,2.) (UNFORMATTED TABLE FOLLOWS)(,)^ H(,4)Fote + CH(,2)(OH)(,2) 5,10-CH(,2)-H(,4)Folate (1)^ Lip(SH)(,2) + NAD('+) LipS(,2) + NADH + H('+) (2)^ H('+) + Gly + LipS(,2) Lip(SH)(,2) + NH(,4)('+) CO(,2) + CH(,2)(OH)(,2) (3)^(TABLE ENDS)^ In this work the K(,c) for Reactions 2 and 3 are reported.^ The K(,c)' for the LipDH reaction described by other authors was reported with unexplainable conclusions regarding the pH depend- ence for the reaction. These conclusions would imply otherwise unexpected acid dissociation constants for reduced and oxidized lipoate. The pK(,a)',s for these compounds have been determined to resolve discrepancy. The conclusions are as follows: (1) The K(,c) for the LipDH reaction is 2.08 x 10('-8); (2) The pK(,a)',s for Lip(SH)(,2) are 4.77(-COOH), 9.91(-SH), 11.59(-SH); for LipS(,2) the carboxyl pK(,a)' is 4.77; (3) Contrary to previous literature, the log K(,c)' for the LipDH reaction is a linear function of the pH, a conclusion supported by the values for the dissociation constants.^ The K(,c) for Reaction 3 is the product of constants for Reactions 4-7. (UNFORMATTED TABLE FOLLOWS)^ LipSHSCH(,2)OH + H(,2)O Lip(SH)(,2) + CH(,2)(OH)(,2) (4)^ H(,2)O + LipSHSCH(,2)NH(,3)('+) LipSHSCH(,2)OH + NH(,4)('+) (5)^ LipSHSCH(,2)NH(,2) + H('+) LipSHSCH(,2)NH(,3)('+) (6)^ Gly + LipS(,2) LipSHSCH(,2)NH(,2) + CO(,2) (7)^(TABLE ENDS)^ Reactions 4-6 are non-enzymatic reactions whose constants were determined spectrophotometrically. Reaction 7 was catalyzed by the partially purified P-protein of GS with equilibrium approached from both directions. The value for K(,c) for this reaction is 8.15 x 10('-3). The combined K(,c) for Reactions 4-7 or Reaction 3 is 2.4 M.^ The overall K(,c) for the GS reaction determined by combination of values for Reactions 1-3 is 1.56 x 10('-3). ^