Depression care for the old-old in a primary care setting

Objective. Although those age 75 and older are the fastest growing age group in the U.S., few studies focus on the course and treatment of depression in this age group. This study examines the differences between the young-old (age 60 to 74) and the old-old (age 75 and older) in regards to their response to a collaborative care model for depression in primary care. We hypothesized that old-old participants would have more severe depression and have a lower rate of treatment response compared to young-old participants. ^ Methods. The sample consisted of 906 participants (n = 606 young-old; n = 300 old-old) who were randomized to receive the intervention with a depression care manager in the IMPACT trial. This study compared young-old and old-old patients on process of care and outcome variables to identify potential differences between the two age groups. Process of care was determined by the type of treatment and level of stepped care received. Clinical outcomes included SCL-20 depression scores, treatment response (defined as a ≥50% decrease in SCL-20 score from baseline) and complete remission (defined as a SCL-20 score <0.5) at 3-, 6-, and 12-months follow-up. ^ Results. The process of care variables did not differ between the two age groups. SCL-20 depression scores did not significantly differ between the two age groups at all follow-up intervals. Treatment response was significantly different between young-old and old-old participants at 6- and 12-months. Complete remission rates were significantly different between the two age-groups at 12-months follow-up. ^ Conclusions. Young-old and old-old patients have a similar clinical response to initial collaborative depression care in a primary care setting, but old-old patients may have lower rates long-term treatment response and complete remission. These findings will help guide future clinical and public health approaches to treat old-old patients with depression. ^

The construction of aging and health in older African American women

Persistence of racial and ethnic health disparities and governmental policies based on outdated ideas of aging call for inclusive approaches to the study of elder African Americans. The lived experiences of aging among urban, poor African American women, who comprise a vulnerable population, are not well known, as most studies focus on mainstream populations. Gerontological studies have tended to employ methods that collapse contextual information for ease of analysis, thus failing to capture nuanced information critically relevant to health of marginalized groups. Few researchers have been successful highlighting the importance of local knowledge, resilience, and resources for health by using participatory methods with older Black women. This study utilizes participatory principles to gather discursive data from nine older African American women, engaged in three generational cohorts: those born around World War II, women born after the great depression, and those born before the great depression. Videotaped and transcribed conversations of cohorts were analyzed in search of contextual factors that influence their experience of aging and health. As women responded to general themes that provoked their talk about their lives, they helped answer the study's questions: How do older African American women make sense of their aging experience? What are some of the important social and cultural influences that shape the construction of aging and health by these women? Are generational discourse groups an effective tool for exploring changes in the experiences of aging? A key finding demonstrated rich heterogeneity of experiences with strong generational influences on the construction of aging and health. The participants' moral orders comprised of traditional values of family, reinforced by personal experiences and the church, have guided their lives through oppression and stress but appear to be failing younger women who have greater exposure to new environmental pressures. Limited time and the size of the study were weaknesses although the women's interest in the study and their participation were gratifying. The participants served to highlight the importance of recognizing generational and other contextual factors in formation of ideas of aging and likelihood of additional challenges to the experience of old age among older, poorer, African Americans. ^