A loss-of-function variant of PTPN22 is associated with reduced risk of systemic lupus erythematosus.

A gain-of-function R620W polymorphism in the PTPN22 gene, encoding the lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase LYP, has recently emerged as an important risk factor for human autoimmunity. Here we report that another missense substitution (R263Q) within the catalytic domain of LYP leads to reduced phosphatase activity. High-resolution structural analysis revealed the molecular basis for this loss of function. Furthermore, the Q263 variant conferred protection against human systemic lupus erythematosus, reinforcing the proposal that inhibition of LYP activity could be beneficial in human autoimmunity.

Outcome-based adaptive randomization for binary data in clinical trials---Compare and contrast

Monte Carlo simulation has been conducted to investigate parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in some well known adaptive randomization procedures. The four urn models studied are Randomized Play-the-Winner (RPW), Randomized Pôlya Urn (RPU), Birth and Death Urn with Immigration (BDUI), and Drop-the-Loses Urn (DL). Two sequential estimation methods, the sequential maximum likelihood estimation (SMLE) and the doubly adaptive biased coin design (DABC), are simulated at three optimal allocation targets that minimize the expected number of failures under the assumption of constant variance of simple difference (RSIHR), relative risk (ORR), and odds ratio (OOR) respectively. Log likelihood ratio test and three Wald-type tests (simple difference, log of relative risk, log of odds ratio) are compared in different adaptive procedures. ^ Simulation results indicates that although RPW is slightly better in assigning more patients to the superior treatment, the DL method is considerably less variable and the test statistics have better normality. When compared with SMLE, DABC has slightly higher overall response rate with lower variance, but has larger bias and variance in parameter estimation. Additionally, the test statistics in SMLE have better normality and lower type I error rate, and the power of hypothesis testing is more comparable with the equal randomization. Usually, RSIHR has the highest power among the 3 optimal allocation ratios. However, the ORR allocation has better power and lower type I error rate when the log of relative risk is the test statistics. The number of expected failures in ORR is smaller than RSIHR. It is also shown that the simple difference of response rates has the worst normality among all 4 test statistics. The power of hypothesis test is always inflated when simple difference is used. On the other hand, the normality of the log likelihood ratio test statistics is robust against the change of adaptive randomization procedures. ^

A systematic review of personalized therapy in patients with advanced cancer

Background: An increased understanding of the pathogenesis of cancer at the molecular level has led to the development of personalized cancer therapy based on the mutation status of the tumor. Tailoring treatments to genetic signatures has improved treatment outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis to provide a quantitative summary of the response to treatment on a phase I clinical trial matched to molecular aberration in patients with advanced solid tumors. ^ Methods: Original studies that reported the results of phase I clinical trials in patients with advanced cancer treated with matched anti-cancer therapies between January 2006 and November 2011 were identified through an extensive search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for each study to assess the strength of an association between objective response rate (ORR) and mutation status. Random effects model was used to estimate the pooled OR and their 95% CI was derived. Funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. ^ Results: Thirteen studies published between January 2006 and November 2011that reported on responses to matched phase I clinical trials in patients with advanced cancer were included in the meta-analysis. Nine studies reported on the responses seen in 538 of the 835 patients with driver mutations responsive to therapy and seven studies on the responses observed in 234 of the 306 patients with mutation predictive for negative response. Random effects model was used to estimate pooled OR, which was 7.767(95% CI = 4.199 − 14.366; p-value=0.000) in patients with activating mutations that were responsive to therapy and 0.287 (95% CI = 0.119 − 0.694; p-value=0.009) in patients with mutation predictive of negative response. ^ Conclusion: It is evident from the meta-analysis that somatic mutations present in tumor tissue of patients are predictive of responses to therapy in patients with advanced cancer in phase I setting. Plethora of research and growing evidence base indicate that selection of patients based on mutation analysis of the tumor and personalizing therapy is a step forward in the war against cancer.^

IMMUNOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF EXTRACORPOREAL PHOTOPHERESIS IN CUTANEOUS T CELL LYMPHOMA AND GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE

IMMUNOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF EXTRACORPOREAL PHOTOPHERESIS IN CUTANEOUS T CELL LYMPHOMA AND GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE Publication No.___________ Lisa Harn-Ging Shiue, B.S. Supervisory Professor: Madeleine Duvic, M.D. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective, low-risk immunomodulating therapy for leukemic cutaneous T cell lymphoma (L-CTCL) and graft versus host disease (GVHD), but whether the mechanism(s) of action in these two diseases is (are) identical or different is unclear. To determine the effects of ECP in vivo, we studied regulatory T cells (T-regs), cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), and dendritic cells (DCs) by immunofluorescence flow cytometry in 18 L-CTCL and 11 GVHD patients before and after ECP at Day 2, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. In this study, ECP was effective in 12/18 L-CTCL patients with a 66.7% overall response rate (ORR) and 6/11 GVHD patients with a 54.5% ORR. Prior to ECP, the percentages of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells in 9 L-CTCL patients were either lower (L-CTCL-Low, n=2) or higher (L-CTCL-High, n=7) than normal. Five of the 7 GVHD patients had high percentages of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells (GVHD-High). Six of 7 L-CTCL-High patients had >80% CD4+Foxp3+ T cells which were correlated with tumor cells, and were responders. Both L-CTCL-High and GVHD-High patients had decreased percentages of CD4+Foxp3+ and CD4+Foxp3+CD25- T cells after 3 months of treatment. CD4+Foxp3+CD25+ T cells increased in GVHD-High patients but decreased in L-CTCL-High patients after 3 months of ECP. In addition, numbers of CTLs were abnormal. We confirmed that numbers of CTLs were low in L-CTCL patients, but high in GVHD patients prior to ECP. After ECP, CTLs increased after 1 month in 4/6 L-CTCL patients whereas CTLs decreased after 6 months in 3/3 GVHD patients. Myeloid (mDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) were also low at baseline in L-CTCL and GVHD patients confirming the DC defect. After 6 months of ECP, numbers and percentages of mDCs and pDCs increased in L-CTCL and GVHD. MDCs were favorably increased in 8/12 L-CTCL responders whereas pDCs were favorably increased in GVHD patients. These data suggest that ECP is favorably modulating the DC subsets. In L-CTCL patients, the mDCs may orchestrate Th1 cell responses to overcome immune suppression and facilitate disease regression. However, in GVHD patients, ECP is favorably down-regulating the immune system and may be facilitating immune tolerance to auto-or allo-antigens. In both L-CTCL and GVHD patients, DCs are modulated, but the T cell responses orchestrated by the DCs are different, suggesting that ECP modulates depending on the immune milieu. _______________