Immunologic characteristics of immunogenic variants generated by {\it in vitro\/} treatment of a methylcholanthrene-induced murine fibrosarcoma MCA-F with 1 methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine, 5 -aza-2$\sp\prime$-deoxycytidine, or ultraviolet radiation

This study addresses the questions of whether the frequency of generation and in vivo cross-reactivity of highly immunogenic tumor clones induced in a single parental murine fibrosarcoma cell line MCA-F is more closely related to the agent used to induce the Imm$\sp{+}$ clone or whether these characteristics are independent of the agents used. These questions were addressed by treating the parental tumor cell line MCA-F with UV-B radiation (UV-B), 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), or 5-aza-2$\sp\prime$-deoxycytidine (5-azaCdR). The frequency of Imm$\sp{+}$ variant generation was similarly high for the three different agents, suggesting that the frequency of Imm$\sp{+}$ generation was related more closely to the cell line than to the inducing agent used. Cross-reactivity was tested with two Imm$\sp{+}$ clones from each treatment group in a modified immunoprotection assay that selectively engendered antivariant, but not antiparental immunity. Under these conditions each clone, except one, immunized against itself. The MNNG-induced clones engendered stronger antivariant immunity but a weaker variant cross-reactive immunity could also be detected.^ This study also characterized the lymphocyte populations responsible for antivariant and antiparental immunity in vivo. Using the local adoptive transfer assay (LATA) and antibody plus complement depletion of T-cell subsets, we showed that immunity induced by the Imm$\sp{+}$ variants against the parent MCA-F was transferred by the Thy1.2$\sp{+}$, L3T4a$\sp{+}$, Lyt2.1$\sp{-}$ (CD4$\sp{+}$) population, without an apparent contribution by Thy1.2$\sp{+}$, L3T4a$\sp{-}$, Lyt2.1$\sp{+}$ (CD8$\sp{+}$) cells. A role for Lyt2.1$\sp{+}$T lymphocytes in antivariant, but not antiparent immunity was supported by the results of LATA and CTL assays. Immunization with low numbers of viable Imm$\sp{+}$ cells, or with high numbers of non viable Imm$\sp{+}$ cells engendered only antivariant immunity without parental cross-protection. The associative recognition of parental antigens and variant neoantigens resulting in strong antiparent immunity was investigated using somatic cells hybrids of Imm$\sp{+}$ variants of MCA-F and an antigenically distinct tumor MCA-D. An unexpected result of these latter experiments was the expression of a unique tumor-specific antigen by the hybrid cells. These studies demonstrate that the parental tumor-specific antigen and the variant neoantigen must be coexpressed on the cell surface to engender parental cross-protective immunity. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.) ^

PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF FAD DEPENDENT NADPH CYTOCHROME P-450 REDUCTASE (FLAVOPROTEINS, APOFLAVOPROTEIN)

NADPH cytochrome P-450 reductase releases FMN and FAD upon dilution into slightly acidic potassium bromide. The flavins are released with positive cooperativity. Dithiothreitol protects the FAD dependent cytochrome c reductase activity against inactivation by free radicals. Behavior in potassium bromide is sensitive to changes in the pH. High performance hydroxylapatite resolved the FAD dependent reductase from holoreductase. For 96% FAD dependent reductase, the overall yield was 12%.^ High FAD dependence was matched by a low FAD content, with FAD/FMN as low as 0.015. There were three molecules of FMN for every four molecules of reductase. The aporeductase had negligible activity towards cytochrome c, ferricyanide, menadione, dichlorophenolindophenol, nitro blue tetrazolium, oxygen and acetyl pyridine adenine dinucleotide phosphate. A four minute incubation in FAD reconstituted one half to all of the specific activity, per milligram protein, of untreated reductase, depending upon the substrate. After a two hour reconstitution, the reductase eluted from hydroxylapatite at the location of holoreductase. It had little flavin dependence, was equimolar in FMN and FAD, and had nearly the specific activity (per mole flavin) of untreated reductase.^ The lack of activity and the ability of FMN to also reconstitute suggest that the redox center of FAD is essential for catalysis, rather than for structure. Dependence upon FAD is consistent with existing hypotheses for the catalytic cycle of the reductase. ^