Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Evaluation with the Radiological Physics Center Head and Neck Phantom

Validation of treatment plan quality and dose calculation accuracy is essential for new radiotherapy techniques, including volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). VMAT delivers intensity modulated radiotherapy treatments while simultaneously rotating the gantry, adding an additional level of complexity to both the dose calculation and delivery of VMAT treatments compared to static gantry IMRT. The purpose of this project was to compare two VMAT systems, Elekta VMAT and Varian RapidArc, to the current standard of care, IMRT, in terms of both treatment plan quality and dosimetric delivery accuracy using the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) head and neck (H&N) phantom. Clinically relevant treatment plans were created for the phantom using typical prescription and dose constraints for Elekta VMAT (planned with Pinnacle3 Smart Arc) and RapidArc and IMRT (both planned with Eclipse). The treatment plans were evaluated to determine if they were clinically comparable using several dosimetric criteria, including ability to meet dose objectives, hot spots, conformity index, and homogeneity index. The planned treatments were delivered to the phantom and absolute doses and relative dose distributions were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and radiochromic film, respectively. The measured and calculated doses of each treatment were compared to determine if they were clinically acceptable based upon RPC criteria of ±7% dose difference and 4 mm distance-to-agreement. Gamma analysis was used to assess dosimetric accuracy, as well. All treatment plans were able to meet the dosimetric objectives set by the RPC and had similar hot spots in the normal tissue. The Elekta VMAT plan was more homogenous but less conformal than the RapidArc and IMRT plans. When comparing the measured and calculated doses, all plans met the RPC ±7%/4 mm criteria. The percent of points passing the gamma analysis for each treatment delivery was acceptable. Treatment plan quality of the Elekta VMAT, RapidArc and IMRT treatments were comparable for consistent dose prescriptions and constraints. Additionally, the dosimetric accuracy of the Elekta VMAT and RapidArc treatments was verified to be within acceptable tolerances.

Integrins in human T cell function: Transdominant regulation, conformational constraints, and intracellular effectors

Integrin adhesion molecules have both positive and negative potential in the regulation of peripheral blood T cell (PB T cell) activation, yet their mechanism of action in the mediation of human T lymphocyte function remains largely undefined. The goals of this study then were to elucidate integrin signaling mechanisms in PB T cells.^ By ligating $\beta$1 integrins with mAb 18D3, it was demonstrated that costimulation of PB T cell proliferation induced by coimmobilizing antibodies specific for $\beta$1, $\beta$2, and $\beta$7 integrin subfamilies in conjunction with the anti-CD3 mAb OKT3 was inhibited. Costimulation of T cell proliferation induced by non-integrins CD4, CD26, CD28, CD44, CD45RA, or CD45RO was unaffected. Inhibition of costimulation correlated with diminished IL-2 production. In his manner, $\beta$1 integrins could regulate heterologous integrins of the $\beta$2 and $\beta$7 subfamilies in a transdominant fashion. It was also demonstrated that integrin costimulation of T cell activation was acutely sensitive to the structural conformation of $\beta$1 integrins. Using the cyclic hexapeptide CWLDVC (TBC772, which is based on the $\alpha4\beta1$ integrin binding site in fibronectin) in soluble form, it was shown that integrins locked into a conformation displaying a neo-epitope called the ligand induced binding site (LIBS) recognized by mAb 15/7 were inhibited from sending mitogenic signals to T cells. When BSA-conjugated TBC772 was coimmobilized with anti-CD3 mAb OKT3, costimulation of proliferation occurred. This suggested that temporally uncoupling integrin receptor occupancy from receptor crosslinking inhibited $\beta$1 integrin signaling mechanisms. When subsets of PB T cells were examined to determine those initially activated by integrins within 6 hours of activation, costimulation induced intracellular accumulation of IL-2 predominantly in the CD4$\sp+$ and CD45RO$\sp+$ T cell subsets. This was similar to a number of PB T cell costimulatory molecules including CD26, CD43, CD44. Only CD28 costimulated IL-2 production from both CD45RA$\sp+$ and CD45RO$\sp+$ subpopulations.^ The GTPase Rho has been implicated in regulating integrin mediated stress fiber formation and anchorage dependent growth in fibroblasts, so studies were initiated to determine if Rho played a role in integrin dependent T cell function. In order to perform this, a technique based on scrape-loading was developed to incorporate macromolecules into PB T cells that maintained their functional activity. With this technique, C3 exoenzyme from Clostridium botulinum was incorporated into PB T cells. C3 ADP-ribosylates Rho proteins on Asn$\sp{41},$ which is in close proximity to the Rho effector domain, rendering it inactive. It was demonstrated that functional Rho is not required for basal or upregulated PB T cell adhesion to $\beta$1 integrin substrates, however PB T cell homotypic aggregation induced by PMA, which is an event mediated predominantly by the integrin $\rm\alpha L\beta2,$ was delayed. PB T cells lacking Rho function displayed altered cell morphology on $\beta$1 integrin ligands, producing stellate, dendritic-like pseudopodia. Rho activity was also found to be required for integrin dependent costimulation of proliferation. When intracellular accumulation of IL-2 was measured, inactivation of Rho prevented both integrin and CD28 costimulatory activity. Rho was identified to lie upstream of signals mediating PKC activation and Ca$\sp{++}$ fluxes, as PMA and ionomycin activation of PB T cells was unaffected by the inactivation of Rho. ^