The Neural Substrates of Multisensory Speech Perception

Comprehending speech is one of the most important human behaviors, but we are only beginning to understand how the brain accomplishes this difficult task. One key to speech perception seems to be that the brain integrates the independent sources of information available in the auditory and visual modalities in a process known as multisensory integration. This allows speech perception to be accurate, even in environments in which one modality or the other is ambiguous in the context of noise. Previous electrophysiological and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments have implicated the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) in auditory-visual integration of both speech and non-speech stimuli. While evidence from prior imaging studies have found increases in STS activity for audiovisual speech compared with unisensory auditory or visual speech, these studies do not provide a clear mechanism as to how the STS communicates with early sensory areas to integrate the two streams of information into a coherent audiovisual percept. Furthermore, it is currently unknown if the activity within the STS is directly correlated with strength of audiovisual perception. In order to better understand the cortical mechanisms that underlie audiovisual speech perception, we first studied the STS activity and connectivity during the perception of speech with auditory and visual components of varying intelligibility. By studying fMRI activity during these noisy audiovisual speech stimuli, we found that STS connectivity with auditory and visual cortical areas mirrored perception; when the information from one modality is unreliable and noisy, the STS interacts less with the cortex processing that modality and more with the cortex processing the reliable information. We next characterized the role of STS activity during a striking audiovisual speech illusion, the McGurk effect, to determine if activity within the STS predicts how strongly a person integrates auditory and visual speech information. Subjects with greater susceptibility to the McGurk effect exhibited stronger fMRI activation of the STS during perception of McGurk syllables, implying a direct correlation between strength of audiovisual integration of speech and activity within an the multisensory STS.

Doctor-patient communication in the medical interaction: Context, implications, and practice

Effective communication; whether from an interpersonal, mass media, or global perspective, is a critical component in public health. It is an essential conduit in increasing public awareness of available health resources, potential health hazards and related disease prevention strategies, and in delivering better health care. Within this context, available literature asserts doctor-patient communication as central to healthcare delivery. It has been shown to affect patient health outcomes, satisfaction with care, adherence to treatment recommendations, and even understanding of medical information. While research supports the essential imperative of interventions aimed at teaching doctors and patients the communication skills necessary for a successful and meaningful medical interaction, most interventions to date, focus on teaching these communication skills to doctors and seem to rely, largely, on mass media for providing patients with the information needed to increase communication efficacy. This study sought to fill a significant gap in the doctor-patient communication literature by reviewing the context of the doctor-patient exchange in the medical interaction, the implications of this exchange in resulting care of the patient, and the potential improvements to practice through interventions aimed at improving the communication exchange. Closing with an evaluation of a patient-centered communication intervention, the “How to Talk to Your Doctor” (HTTTYD) program that combines previously identified optimal strategies for improving communication between doctors and patients, this study examined the patients’ perspective of their potential as better communicators in the medical interaction. ^ Specific Aims, Hypotheses or Questions (Aim I) To examine the context of health communication within a public health framework and its relation to health care delivery. (Aim II) To review doctor-patient communication as a central focus within health care delivery and the resulting implications to patient care. (Aim III) To assess the utility of interventions to improve doctor-patient communication. Specifically, to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient-centered community education intervention, the “How to Talk to Your Doctor” (HTTTYD) program, aimed at improving patient communication efficacy.^

Texas Medical Center --- Its Origins

This document details the people and institutions who were instrumental in the establishment and development of the Texas Medical Center (TMC). Biographical information about the founders, role the M. D. Anderson Foundation, and opening of the main institutions in the early 1950s is detailed. A copy of a speech given in 1958 by W. B. Bates, one of the trustees of the M. D. Anderson Foundation, on the history and development of the TMC is significant because he was one of the founders of the TMC. This document was commissioned by the Houston Chamber of Commerce in 1971 as the Texas Medical Center began a new phase of expansion with the pending addition of The University of Texas Medical School at Houston. It includes information about each of the 21 institutions which comprised the TMC at that time.