Gene transfer by viral vectors

To initiate our clinical trial for chemotherapy protection, I established the retroviral vector system for human MDR1 cDNA gene transfer. The human MDR1 cDNA continued to be expressed in the transduced bone marrow cells after four cohorts of serial transplants, 17 months after the initial transduction and transplant. In addition, we used this retroviral vector pVMDR1 to transduce human bone marrow and peripheral blood CD34$\sp+$ cells on stromal monolayer in the presence of hematopoietic growth factors. These data suggest that the retroviral vector pVMDR1 could modify hematopoietic precursor cells with a capacity for long-term self renewal. Thus, it may be possible to use the MDR1 retroviruses to confer chemotherapeutic protection on human normal hematopoietic precursor cells of ovarian and breast cancer patients in whom high doses of MDR drugs may be required to control the diseases.^ Another promising vector system is recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector. An impediment to use rAAV vectors is that production of rAAV vectors for clinical use is extremely cumbersome and labor intensive. First I set up the rAAV vector system in our laboratory and then, I focused on studies related to the production of rAAV vectors for clinical use. By using a self-inactivating retroviral vector carrying a selection marker under the control of the CMV immediate early promoter and an AAV genome with the deletion of both ITRs, I have developed either a transient or a stable method to produce rAAV vectors. These methods involve infection only and can generate high-titer rAAV vectors (up to 2 x 10$\sp5$ cfu/ml of CVL) with much less work.^ Although recombinant adenoviral vectors hardly infect early hematopoietic precursor cells lacking $\alpha\sb v\beta\sb5$ or $\alpha\sb v\beta\sb3$ integrin on their surface, but efficiently infect other cells, we can use these properties of adenoviral vectors for bone marrow purging as well as for development of new viral vectors such as pseudotyped retroviral vectors and rAAV vectors. Replacement of self-inactivating retroviral vectors by recombinant adenoviral vectors will facilitate the above strategies for production of new viral vectors. In order to accomplish these goals, I developed a new method which is much more efficient than the current methods to construct adenoviral vectors. This method involves a cosmid vector system which is utilized to construct the full-length recombinant adenoviral vectors in vitro.^ First, I developed an efficient and flexible method for in vitro construction of the full-length recombinant adenoviral vectors in the cosmid vector system by use of a three-DNA fragment ligation. Then, this system was improved by use of a two-DNA fragment ligation. The cloning capacity of recombinant adenoviral vectors constructed by this method to develop recombinant adenoviral vectors depends on the efficiency of transfection only. No homologous recombination is required for development of infectious adenoviral vectors. Thus, the efficiency of generating the recombinant adenoviral vectors by the cosmid method reported here was much higher than that by the in vitro direct ligation method or the in vivo homologous recombination method reported before. This method of the in vitro construction of recombinant adenoviral vectors in the cosmid vector system may facilitate the development of adenoviral vector for human gene therapy. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

PHENOTYPIC ASSOCIATION OF GENE AMPLIFICATION WITH MULTIPLE DRUG RESISTANCE IN VINCRISTINE RESISTANT CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY CELLS

Resistance of tumors to pharmacologic agents poses a significant problem in the treatment of human malignancies. This study overviews the scope of clinical resistance and focuses upon current research attempts toward investigation of the phenomenon of multidrug resistance (MDR).^ The objective of this investigation was to determine whether gene amplification had a role in the development of the MDR phenotype in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) primarily selected for resistance to vincristine (VCR). A DNA fragment, previously shown to be amplified in two independently derived Chinese hamster cell lines exhibiting the MDR phenotype, was also amplified in VCR hamster lines. Sequences flanking this fragment were shown to contain coding information for a 4.3 kb transcript overproduced in VCR cells. These sequences were not enriched in double minute DNA preparations isolated from VCR cells. There was an approximately forty-fold increase in both the level of gene amplification and transcript overproduction in the VCR cell lines, independent of the level of primary resistance. This DNA amplification and overproduction of the 4.3 kb transcript was also demonstrated in CHO cells independently selected for resistance to Adriamycin and vinblastine.^ All the DNA sequences of two hamster cDNA clones containing 785 and 932 base pair inserts showed direct homology to the published mouse mdr sequences (about 90%). This sequence conservation held for only portions of the gene when the human mdr1 sequences were compared with those from either the mouse or hamster.^ Somatic cell hybrids, constructed between VCR CHO cells and sensitive murine cells, were used to determine whether there was a functional relationship between the chromosome bearing the amplified sequences and the MDR phenotype. Concordant segregation between vincristine resistance, the MDR phenotype, the presence of MDR-associated amplified sequences, overexpression of the mRNA encoded by these sequences, overexpression of the mRNA encoded by these sequences, and CHO chromosome Z1 was consistent with the hypothesis that there is an amplified gene on chromosome Z1 of the VCR CHO cells which is responsible for MDR in these cells. ^

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance: Differences between natural and acquired adriamycin -resistant human colon carcinoma cells

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance (MDR) were studied in two independent MDR sublines (AdR1.2 and SRA1.2) derived from the established human colon carcinoma cell line LoVo. AdR1.2 was developed by long-term continuous exposure of the cells to adriamycin (AdR) in stepwise increments of concentration, while SRA1.2 was selected by repetitive pulse treatments with AdR at a single concentration. In this dissertation, the hypothesis that the mechanism of drug resistance in SRA1.2 is different than that in AdR1.2 is tested. While SRA1.2 demonstrated similar biological characteristics when compared to the parental LoVo, AdR1.2 exhibited remarkable alterations in biological properties. The resistance phenotype of AdR1.2 was reversible when the cells were grown in the drug-free medium whereas SRA1.2 maintained its resistance for at least 10 months under similar conditions. Km and Vmax of carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion AdR transport were similar among the three lines. However, both resistant sublines exhibited an energy-dependent drug efflux. AdR1.2 appeared to possess an activated efflux pump, and a decreased nucleus-binding of AdR, whereas SRA1.2 showed merely a lower affinity in binding of AdR to the nuclei. Southern blot analysis showed no amplification of the MDR1 gene in either of the two resistant subclones. However, Western blot analysis using the C219 monoclonal antibody against P170 glycoprotein detected a Mr 150-kDa plasma protein (P150) in AdR1.2 but not in SRA1.2 or in the parental LoVo. In vitro phosphorylation studies revealed that P150 was a phosphoprotein; its phosphorylation was Mg$\sp{2+}$-dependent and could be enhanced by verapamil, an agent capable of increasing intracellular AdR accumulation in AdR1.2 cells. The phosphorylation studies also revealed elevated phosphorylation of a Mr 66-kDa plasma membrane protein that was detectable in the AdR1.2 revertant and in AdR1.2 when verapamil was present, suggesting that hyperphosphorylation of the Mr 66-kDa protein may be related to the reversal of MDR. SDS-PAGE of the plasma membrane protein demonstrated overproduction of a Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa protein was not immunoreactive with C219, but its absence in the AdR1.2 revertant and the parental LoVo suggests that it is an MDR-related plasma membrane protein. In conclusion, the results from this study support the author's hypothesis that the mechanisms responsible for "Acquired" and "Natural" MDR are not identical. ^

Transcriptional regulation of the rat {\it mdr1b\/} gene

The expression of P-glycoproteins encoded by the mdr gene family is associated with the emergence of multidrug-resistance phenotype in animal cells. This gene family includes two members, MDR1 and MDR2, in humans, and three members, mdr1a, mdr1b, and mdr2, in rodents. Among them, the rat mdr1b is known to be highly activated during hepatocarcinogenesis, and its expression is sensitive to the treatment with growth factors, cytotoxic drugs, as well as other physical or chemical stresses. It is believed that the transcriptional regulation plays an important role in above events, however little has been known about mechanisms involved.^ To elucidate how mdr1b expression is regulated, we isolated the genomic sequence of the rat mdr1b and functionally dissected its 5$\prime$ promoter region. Our results demonstrated that: (1) the transcription start site of the rat mdr1b is identical to that of the murine mdr1b homologue; (2) a palindromic sequence from bp $-$189 to $-$180 bp is essential for the basal promoter function of the rat mdr1b, and binds to a specific protein that appears to be a novel transcription factor implicated in the regulation of the rat mdr1b expression; (3) a NF-$\kappa$B-binding site from bp $-$167 to $-$159 is also involved in the basal promoter function. The p65/p50 subunits of the NF-$\kappa$B and raf-1 kinase are implicated in the insulin-inducible promoter activity of the mdr1b, suggesting the important role of NF-$\kappa$B in the regulation of the mdr1b by growth factors; (4) a p53-binding site from bp $-$199 to $-$180 is not only essential for the basal promoter activity but also responsible for the induction of mdr1b by cytotoxic agents. In addition, we provided evidence showing that endogenous mdr1b expression can be modulated by wild-type p53. On the basis of these findings, a model of transcriptional regulation of the rat mdr1b was proposed. ^