Evidence for glutamatergic ganglion cells in the avian retina

This dissertation presents structural, immunochemical and neurochemical evidence for glutamatergic retinotectal synaptic transmission, augmenting and extending previous physiological and anatomical studies. The evidence is especially striking when the laminar patterns of ($\sp3$H) L-glutamate receptor binding, ($\sp3$H) L-glutamate high affinity uptake (HAU) and glutamate immunoreactivity (GLIR) of the dorsal tectum are compared. All show high activity in the tectal SGFS, with a peak in the most superficial laminae of SGFS followed by dip in the b-c region, and a second broad peak in deeper SGFS. Uptake and immunoreactivity bear a stronger resemblance to one another than either does to receptor binding, consistent with the fact that HAU and GLIR are localized in the same structures: glutamatergic terminals, intrinsic cell bodies and their processes. Receptor binding, as attested by the lack of enucleation effects, is a marker of postsynaptic receptors. In summary, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that most of the retinal projection to the optic tectum is glutamatergic: (1) A glutamate/aspartate HAU system exists in the superficial laminae, and it is dependent upon an intact retinal input, as shown developmentally and by retinal ablation; (2) Glutamate-like immunoreactivity appears in retinorecipient tectal regions (partially responsive to enucleation), in cell bodies of retinal ganglion cells and displaced ganglion cells, and in a non-tectal ganglion cell projection, the ectomammilary nucleus; (3) Sodium-independent glutamate receptor binding (which remains unchanged by enucleation) is most intense in the retinorecipient regions of the tectum and the ectomammilary nucleus. This binding is pharmacologically typical of a CNS sensory structure, being dominated by the quisqualate/kainate receptor subclass. Thus, as with other sensory systems, a portion of the retinotectal projection has been shown to include glutamatergic afferents with the distribution and properties expected of the primary projection ^

Long-term regulation of neuronal high-affinity glutamate and glutamine uptake in Aplysia.

An increase in transmitter release accompanying long-term sensitization and facilitation occurs at the glutamatergic sensorimotor synapse of Aplysia. We report that a long-term increase in neuronal Glu uptake also accompanies long-term sensitization. Synaptosomes from pleural-pedal ganglia exhibited sodium-dependent, high-affinity Glu transport. Different treatments that induce long-term enhancement of the siphon-withdrawal reflex, or long-term synaptic facilitation increased Glu uptake. Moreover, 5-hydroxytryptamine, a treatment that induces long-term facilitation, also produced a long-term increase in Glu uptake in cultures of sensory neurons. The mechanism for the increase in uptake is an increase in the V(max) of transport. The long-term increase in Glu uptake appeared to be dependent on mRNA and protein synthesis, and transport through the Golgi, because 5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole riboside, emetine, and brefeldin A inhibited the increase in Glu uptake. Also, injection of emetine and 5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole into Aplysia prevented long-term sensitization. Synthesis of Glu itself may be regulated during long-term sensitization because the same treatments that produced an increase in Glu uptake also produced a parallel increase in Gln uptake. These results suggest that coordinated regulation of a number of different processes may be required to establish or maintain long-term synaptic facilitation.

Glutamate iontophoresis induces long-term potentiation in the absence of evoked presynaptic activity

$\rm\underline{L}$ong-$\rm\underline{t}$erm $\rm\underline{p}$otentiation (LTP) is a candidate cellular mechanism underlying mammalian learning and memory. Protocols that induce LTP typically involve afferent stimulation. The experiments described in this dissertation tested the hypothesis that LTP induction does not require presynaptic activity. The significance of this hypothesis is underscored by results suggesting that LTP expression may involve activity-dependent presynaptic changes. An induction protocol using glutamate iontophoresis was developed that reliably induces LTP in hippocampal slices without afferent stimulation (ionto-LTP). Ionto-LTP is induced when excitatory postsynaptic potentials are completely blocked with adenosine and $\rm\underline{t}$etrodo$\rm\underline{t}$o$\rm\underline{x}$in (TTX). These results suggest constraints on the involvement of presynaptic mechanisms and putative retrograde messengers in LTP induction and expression; namely, these processes must function without many forms of activity-dependent presynaptic processes.^ In testing the role of pre-and postsynaptic mechanisms in LTP expression whole-cell recordings were used to examine the frequency and amplitude of $\rm\underline{s}$pontaneous $\rm\underline{e}$xcitatory $\rm\underline{p}$o$\rm\underline{s}$ynaptic $\rm\underline{c}$urrents (sEPSCs) in CA1 pyramidal neurons. sEPSCs where comprised of an equal mixture of TTX insensitive miniature EPSCs and sEPSCs that appeared to result from spontaneous action potentials (i.e., TTX sensitive EPSCs). The detection of all sEPSCs was virtually eliminated by CNQX, suggesting that sEPSCs were glutamate mediated synaptic events. Changes in the amplitude and frequency sEPSCs were examined during the expression of ionto-LTP to obtain new information about the cellular location of mechanisms involved in synaptic plasticity. The findings of this dissertation show that ionto-LTP expression results from increased sEPSC amplitude in the absence of lasting increases in sEPSC frequency. Potentiation of sEPSC amplitude without changes in sEPSC frequency has been previously interpreted to be due to postsynaptic mechanisms. Although this interpretation is supported by findings from peripheral synapses, its application to the central nervous system is unclear. Therefore, alternative mechanisms are also considered in this dissertation. Models based on increased release probability for action potential dependent transmitter release appear insufficient to explain our results. The most straightforward interpretation of the results in this dissertation is that LTP induced by glutamate iontophoresis on dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons is mediated by postsynaptic mechanisms. ^