Cellular dynamic simulator: an event driven molecular simulation environment for cellular physiology.

In this paper, we present the Cellular Dynamic Simulator (CDS) for simulating diffusion and chemical reactions within crowded molecular environments. CDS is based on a novel event driven algorithm specifically designed for precise calculation of the timing of collisions, reactions and other events for each individual molecule in the environment. Generic mesh based compartments allow the creation / importation of very simple or detailed cellular structures that exist in a 3D environment. Multiple levels of compartments and static obstacles can be used to create a dense environment to mimic cellular boundaries and the intracellular space. The CDS algorithm takes into account volume exclusion and molecular crowding that may impact signaling cascades in small sub-cellular compartments such as dendritic spines. With the CDS, we can simulate simple enzyme reactions; aggregation, channel transport, as well as highly complicated chemical reaction networks of both freely diffusing and membrane bound multi-protein complexes. Components of the CDS are generally defined such that the simulator can be applied to a wide range of environments in terms of scale and level of detail. Through an initialization GUI, a simple simulation environment can be created and populated within minutes yet is powerful enough to design complex 3D cellular architecture. The initialization tool allows visual confirmation of the environment construction prior to execution by the simulator. This paper describes the CDS algorithm, design implementation, and provides an overview of the types of features available and the utility of those features are highlighted in demonstrations.

An integrated molecular biology and computational approach to CYP1A1 expression in human brain

The cytochromes P450 comprise a superfamily of heme-containing mono-oxygenases. These enzymes metabolize numerous xenobiotics, but also play a role in metabolism of endogenous compounds. The P450 1A1 enzyme generally metabolizes polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and its expression can be induced by aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation. CYP1A1 is an exception to the generality that the majority of CYPs demonstrate highest expression in liver; CYP1Al is present in numerous extrahepatic tissues, including brain. This P450 has been observed in two forms, wildtype (WT) and brain variant (BV), arising from alternatively spliced mRNA transcripts. The CYP1A1 BV mRNA presented an exon deletion and was detected in human brain but not liver tissue of the same individuals. ^ Quantitative PCR analyses were performed to determine CYP1A1 WT and BV transcript expression levels in normal, bipolar disorder or schizophrenic groups. In our samples, we show that CYP1A1 BV mRNA, when present, is found alongside the full-length form. Furthermore, we demonstrate a significant decrease in expression of CYP1A1 in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. The expression level was not influenced by post-mortem interval, tissue pH, age, tobacco use, or lifetime antipsychotic medication load. ^ There is no indication of increased brain CYP1A1 expression in normal smokers versus non-smokers in these samples. We observed slightly increased CYP1A1 expression only in bipolar and schizophrenic smokers versus non-smokers. This may be indicative of complex interactions between neuronal chemical environments and AhR-mediated CYP1A1 induction in brain. ^ Structural homology modeling demonstrated that P450 1A1 BV has several alterations to positions/orientations of substrate recognition site residues compared to the WT isoform. Automated substrate docking was employed to investigate the potential binding of neurological signaling molecules and neurotropic drugs, as well as to differentiate specificities of the two P450 1A1 isoforms. We consistently observed that the BV isoform produced energetically favorable substrate dockings in orientations not observed for the same substrate in the WT isoform. These results demonstrated that structural differences, namely an expanded substrate access channel and active site, confer greater capacity for unique compound docking positions suggesting a metabolic profile distinct from the wildtype form for these test compounds. ^