Differences in performance for quality of care indicators for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) across various hospital categories in Texas

The study analyzed Hospital Compare data for Medicare Fee-for-service patients at least 65 years of age to determine whether hospital performance for AMI outcome and processes of care measures differ amongst Texas hospitals with respect to ownership status (for profit vs. not-for-profit), academic status (teaching vs. non-teaching) and geographical setting (rural vs. urban). ^ The study found a statistically significant difference between for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals in four process-of-care measures (aspirin at discharge, P=0.028; ACE or ARB inhibitor for LSVD, P=0.048; Smoking cessation advice: P=0.034; outpatients who got aspirin with 24 hours of arrival in the ED, P=0.044). No significant difference in performance was found between COTH-member teaching and non-teaching hospitals for any of the eight process-of-care measures or the two outcome measures for AMI. The study was unable to compare performance based on geographic setting of hospitals due to lack of sufficient data for rural hospitals. ^ The results of the study suggest that for-profit Texas hospitals might be slightly better than not-for –profit hospitals at providing possible heart attack patients with certain processes of care.^

Relationships among epilepsy self-management, health outcomes, and socioeconomic status

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between epilepsy self-management and disease control and socio-economic status. Study participants were adult patients at two epilepsy specialty clinics in Houston, Texas that serve demographically and socioeconomically diverse populations. Self-management behaviors- medication, information, safety, seizure, and lifestyle management were tested against emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and seizure occurrence. Overall self-management score was associated with a greater likelihood of hospitalizations over a prior twelve month time frame, but not for three months, and was not associated with seizure occurrence or emergency room visits, at all. Scores on specific self-management behaviors varied in their relationships to the different disease control indicators, over time. Contrary to expectations based on the findings of previous research, higher information management scores were associated with greater likelihood of emergency room visits and hospitalizations, over the study's twelve months. Higher lifestyle management scores were associated with lower likelihood of any emergency room visits, over the preceding twelve months and emergency room visits for the last three months. The positive associations between overall self-management scores and information management behaviors and disease control are contrary to published research. These findings may indicate that those with worse disease control in a prior period employ stronger self-management efforts to better control their epilepsy. Further research is needed to investigate this hypothesis.^