Hsp110 chaperones control client fate determination in the hsp70-Hsp90 chaperone system.

Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) plays a central role in protein homeostasis and quality control in conjunction with other chaperone machines, including Hsp90. The Hsp110 chaperone Sse1 promotes Hsp90 activity in yeast, and functions as a nucleotide exchange factor (NEF) for cytosolic Hsp70, but the precise roles Sse1 plays in client maturation through the Hsp70-Hsp90 chaperone system are not fully understood. We find that upon pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90, a model protein kinase, Ste11DeltaN, is rapidly degraded, whereas heterologously expressed glucocorticoid receptor (GR) remains stable. Hsp70 binding and nucleotide exchange by Sse1 was required for GR maturation and signaling through endogenous Ste11, as well as to promote Ste11DeltaN degradation. Overexpression of another functional NEF partially compensated for loss of Sse1, whereas the paralog Sse2 fully restored GR maturation and Ste11DeltaN degradation. Sse1 was required for ubiquitinylation of Ste11DeltaN upon Hsp90 inhibition, providing a mechanistic explanation for its role in substrate degradation. Sse1/2 copurified with Hsp70 and other proteins comprising the "early-stage" Hsp90 complex, and was absent from "late-stage" Hsp90 complexes characterized by the presence of Sba1/p23. These findings support a model in which Hsp110 chaperones contribute significantly to the decision made by Hsp70 to fold or degrade a client protein.

Genetic epidemiologic methods in risk determination in Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is characterized by a variety of neoplasms occurring at a young age with an apparent autosomal dominant transmission. Individuals in pedigrees with LFS have high incidence of second malignancies. Recently LFS has been found to be associated with germline mutations of a tumor-suppressor gene, p53. Because LFS is rare and indeed not a clear-cut disease, it is not known whether all cases of LFS are attributable to p53 germline mutations and how p53 plays in cancer occurrence in such cancer syndrome families. In the present study, DNAs from constitutive cells of two-hundred and thirty-three family members from ten extended pedigrees were screened for p53 mutations. Six out of the ten LFS families had germline mutations at the p53 locus, including point and deletion mutations. In these six families, 55 out of 146 members were carriers of p53 mutations. Except one, all mutations occurred in exons 5 to 8 (i.e., the "hot spot" region) of the p53 gene. The age-specific penetrance of cancer was estimated after the genotype for each family member at risk was determined. The penetrance was 0.15, 0.29, 0.35, 0.77, and 0.91 by 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 year-old, respectively, in male carriers; 0.19, 0.44, 0.76, and 0.90 by 20, 30, 40, and 50 year-old, respectively, in female carriers. These results indicated that one cannot escape from tumorigenesis if one inherits a p53 mutant allele; at least ninety percent of p53 carriers will develop cancer by the age of 60. To evaluate the possible bias due to the unexamined blood-relatives in LFS families, I performed a simulation analysis in which a p53 genotype was assigned to each unexamined person based on his cancer status and liability to cancer. The results showed that the penetrance estimates were not biased by the unexamined relatives. I also determined the sex, site, and age-specific penetrance of breast cancer in female carriers and lung cancer in male carriers. The penetrance of breast cancer in female carriers was 0.81 by age 45; the penetrance of lung cancer in male carriers was 0.78 by age 60, indicating that p53 play a key role for tumorigenesis in common cancers. ^

Esx1 dosage impacts reproductive fitness: Effects on viability and fertility

Numerous genes expressed in placenta or testis localize to the X-chromosome. Both tissues undergo specialized X-chromosome inactivation (imprinted paternal inactivation in placenta and MSCI in testicular germ cells). When the X-chromosome is duplicated or improperly inactivated, defects in placentation, growth and spermatogenesis are noted, suggesting tight control of X-chromosome gene dosage is important for reproduction. ^ Esx1 is a mouse homeobox gene on the X-chromosome with expression limited to extraembryonic tissues and testicular germ cells. Here, we examine the effects of increased and decreased Esx1 dosage on placental and testicular development, the role of genetic background on Esx1 function and characterize the human orthologue of Esx1. ^ Previously, by targeted deletion, Esx1 was shown to be an X-chromosome imprinted regulator of placental development and fetal growth. We show C57Bl6-congenic Esx1 mutants display a more severe phenotype with decreased viability and that the 129 genetic background contains dominant modifier genes that enhance Esx1 mutant survival. ^ Varying Esx1 dosage impacts testicular germ cell development. Esx1 hemizygous null mice are fertile, but we show their testes are two-thirds normal size. To examine the effect of increased Esx1 dosage, Esx1 BAC transgenic mice were generated. Increased Esx1 dosage results in dramatic deficits in testicular germ cell development, leading to sterility and testes one-fourth normal size. We show germ cell loss occurs through apoptosis, begins between postnatal day 6 and 10, and that no spermatocytes complete meiosis. Interestingly, increased Esx1 dosage in testes mimics germ cell loss seen in Klinefelter's (XXY) mice and humans and may represent a molecular mechanism for the infertility characteristic of this syndrome. ^ Esx1 dosage impacts reproductive fitness when maternally transmitted. Three transgenic founder females were unable to transmit the transgene to live offspring, but did produce transgenic pups at earlier stages. Additionally, one line of Esx1 BAC transgenic mice demonstrated decreased embryo size and fitness when the transgene is inherited compared to wild type littermates. ^ It is possible that Esx1 plays a role in human disorders of pregnancy, growth and spermatogenesis. Therefore, we cloned and characterized ESX1L (human Esx1), and show it is expressed in human testis and placenta. ^

Negative regulation of Drosophila Transformer2 by SR splicing factors

The Drosophila Transformer-2 (Tra2) protein activates the splicing of doublesex and fruitless pre-mRNA and represses M1 intron splicing in its own RNA in male germline. The M1 retention is part of negative feedback mechanism that controls Tra2 protein synthesis. However it is not known how the M1 intron is repressed or why Tra2 activates splicing of some RNAs while repressing splicing in others. Here we show that Tra2 and SR protein Rbp1 function together to specifically repress M1 splicing in vitro through the same intronic silencer by binding independently to distinct sites. The role of Rbp1 in M1 repression in vivo was validated by the finding that increased expression of Rbp1 in S2 cells promotes M1 retention. Furthermore, Tra2 blocks prespliceosomal A complex formation, a step corresponding to U2 snRNP recruitment to the branchpoint. High levels of Tra2 repression require an upstream enhancer. Together, we propose that the complex formed by Tra2 and Rbp1 on the silencer achieves splicing repression by blocking the recognition of the branchpoint or antagonizing enhancer function. ^ In addition, both splicing regulatory activities of Tra2 are essential developmental events, doublesex splicing is the key for Drosophila sex determination in the soma, while M1 retention occurs in the male germline and is necessary for spermatogenesis. However, active Tra2 is expressed ubiquitously. So another issue we have studied is how Tra2 accomplishes negative and positive splicing regulation in a tissue-specific fashion. Surprisingly, we found that nuclear extract from somatically-derived S2 cells support M1 repression in vitro. This led us to hypothesize that no germline specific factor is required and that high levels of Tra2 expression in the male germline is sufficient to trigger M1 retention. To test it, I examined whether increased expression of Tra2 could promote M1 retention in cells outside male germline. My results show that increased Tra2 expression promotes M1 retention in somatically-derived S2 cells as well as in the somatic tissues of living flies. These results show that somatic tissues are capable of supporting M1 repression but do not normally do so because the low levels of Tra2 do not trigger negative feedback regulation. ^