RE-AIM analysis of Internet-based psychotherapy

We live in an era where the Internet is expected to be available at the home, the workplace, schools, libraries, and even the corner café. Everyday, more and more of the world's population is connected to this growing minefield of information, many of whom use it to seek out services they need. Health services are amongst the many purchasable products currently available online. The Internet, thus, is a viable method of contacting populations that a provider would not traditionally be able to reach. A growing service in this area is the practice of Internet-based psychotherapy. This goes by many other names as well, such as e-counseling, telecounseling, web therapy, computer mediated counseling, Interapy, and many other variations. ^ This paper reviews the current available literature on the efficacy and associated concerns of Internet-based psychotherapy through the RE-AIM lens. After an evaluation of the selected studies, Internet-based psychotherapy may be able to reach a wider audience than with traditional means and also produces similar efficacy results to in-person therapy. However, providers are still reluctant to adopt Internet-based psychotherapy due to legal concerns, and long-term maintenance of these practices may be an issue. Further research into the effectiveness, cost, and legal issues surrounding Internet-based psychotherapy is recommended. ^

Cross-culture perspectives on fear of HIV disease and AIDS in health care workers

Health care workers have been known to carry into the workplace a variety of judgmental and negative attitudes towards their patients. In no other area of patient care has this issue been more pronounced as in the management of patients with AIDS. Health care workers have refused to treat or manage patients with AIDS and have often treated them more harshly than identically described leukemia patients. Some health care institutions have simply refused to admit patients with AIDS and even recent applicants to medical colleges and schools of nursing have indicated a preference for schools in areas with low prevalence of HIV disease. Since the attitudes of health care workers do have significant consequences on patient management, this study was carried out to determine the differences in clinical practice in Nigeria and the United States of America as it relates to knowledge of a patient's HIV status, determine HIV prevalence and culture in each of the study sites and how they impact on infection control practices, determine the relationship between infection control practices and fear of AIDS, and also determine the predictors of safe infection control practices in each of the study sites.^ The study utilized the 38-item fear of AIDS scale and the measure of infection control questionnaire for its data. Questionnaires were administered to health care workers at the university teaching hospital sites of Houston, Texas and Calabar in Nigeria. Data was analyzed using a chi-square test, and where appropriate, a student t-tests to establish the demographic variables for each country. Factor analysis was done using principal components analysis followed by varimax rotation to simple structure. The subscale scores for each study site were compared using t-tests (separate variance estimates) and utilizing Bonferroni adjustments for number of tests. Finally, correlations were carried out between infection control procedures and fear of AIDS in each study site using Pearson-product moment correlation coefficients.^ The study revealed that there were five dimensions of the fear of AIDS in health care workers, namely fear of loss of control, fear of sex, fear of HIV infection through blood and illness, fear of death and medical interventions and fear of contact with out-groups. Fear of loss of control was the primary area of concern in the Nigerian health care workers whereas fear of HIV infection through blood and illness was the most important area of AIDS related feats in United States health care workers. The study also revealed that infection control precautions and practices in Nigeria were based more on normative and social pressures whereas it was based on knowledge of disease transmission, supervision and employee discipline in the United States, and thus stresses the need for focused educational programs in health care settings that emphasize universal precautions at all times and that are sensitive to the cultural nuances of that particular environment. ^