Gene Discovery in Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate

Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCLP), a common, complex orofacial birth defect that affects approximately 4,000 newborns each year in the United States, is caused by both genetic and environmental factors. Orofacial clefts affect the mouth and nose, causing severe deformity of the face, which require medical, dental and speech therapies. Despite having substantial genetic liability, less than 25% of the genetic contribute to NSCLP has been identified. The studies described in this thesis were performed to identify genes that contribute to NSCLP and to demonstrate the role of these genes in normal craniofacial development. Using genome scan and candidate gene approaches, novel associations with NSCLP were identified. These include MYH9 (7 SNPs, 0.009≤p<0.05), Wnt3A (4 SNPs, 0.001≤p≤0.005), Wnt11 (2 SNPs, 0.001≤p≤0.01) and CRISPLD2 (4 SNPs, 0.001≤p<0.05). The most interesting findings were for CRISPLD2. This gene is expressed in the fused mouse palate at E17.5. In zebrafish, crispld2 localized to the craniofacial region by one day post fertilization. Morpholino knockdown of crispld2 resulted in a lower survival rates and altered neural crest cell (NCC) clustering. Because NCCs form the tissues that populate the craniofacies, this NCC abnormality resulted in cartilage abnormalities of the jaw including fewer ceratobranchial cartilages forming the lower jaw (three pairs compared to five) and broader craniofacies compared to wild-type zebrafish. These findings suggest that the CRISPLD2 gene plays an important role in normal craniofacial development and perturbation of this gene in humans contributes to orofacial clefting. Overall, these results are important because they contribute to our understanding of normal craniofacial development and orofacial clefting etiology, information that can be used to develop better methods to diagnose, counsel and potentially treat NSCLP patients.

AN ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF GENETIC COUNSELING SERVICES IN U.S. HTCs

Hemophilia is a hereditary bleeding disorder which requires lifelong specialized care. A network of Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) exists to meet the medical needs of patients affected by hemophilia. Genetic counseling services are an integral part of the HTC model of care; however, many HTCs do not have genetic counselors on staff. As a result, the duty to provide these services must fall to other healthcare providers within the HTC. To assess the knowledge and attitudes of these providers we developed a 49 question survey that was distributed electronically to hematologists and nurses at U.S. HTCs. The survey consisted of a three sections: demographic information, knowledge of hemophilia genetics, and attitudes towards genetic services. A total of 111 complete responses were received and analyzed. The average knowledge score among all participants was 74.8% with a total of 81 participants receiving a passing score of 70% or above. Thirty participants scored below 70% in the knowledge section. In general, attitude scores were high indicating that the majority of hematologists and nurses in HTCs feel confident in their ability to provide genetic counseling services. Over 90% of participants reported that they have some form of access to genetic counseling services at their center. Hematologists and nurses practicing in U.S. HTCs demonstrate sufficient knowledge of the genetics of hemophilia, and they generally feel confident in their ability to provide genetic counseling services to their patients. While their knowledge is sufficient, the average knowledge score was lower than 75%. Certain questions covering new genetic technologies and testing practices were more commonly missed than questions asking about more basic aspects of hemophilia genetics, such as inheritance and carrier testing. Finally, many clinics report having access to a counselor, but it is oftentimes a hematologist or nurse who is providing genetic counseling services to patients. Given the inconsistency in knowledge among providers coupled with the high confidence in one’s ability to counsel patients, it leaves room to question whether information about the genetics of hemophilia is being communicated to patients in the most appropriate and accurate manner.