The prevalence of burnout among psychologists and psychological associates in the state of Texas

This study investigates the prevalence of burnout among a sample of Texas psychologists and psychological associates as well as differences between the three categories of practitioners within that group (Licensed Psychology Health Care Providers (LPHCP), Licensed Psychologists - Certified Psychologists (LP-CP), Psychological Associates (PA)).^ The Maslach Burnout Inventory and a questionnaire seeking demographic information was used in this cross-sectional survey. Sample size was 654. A stratified proportionate random sample of Texas Psychologists was drawn. The response rate based on usable returns was 55% (n = 359). General demographic characteristics were determined mainly by frequency distributions. For comparing means of samples, t and multiple range tests were used. A series of one-way and two-way analysis of variance procedures were used to compare subgroup differences in burnout.^ The universe was representative for the sample and for the three categories of psychologists. Urban subjects were more likely to respond, as were male PAs. Practitioners were as likely male as female, working in an urban area, in their present job eight years, and in the occupation for fifteen. The LPHCP group were older, had been in psychology and at their present job longer, and were more likely to belong to both state and local professional organizations than the other two groups. Males outnumbered females in this group and in LP-CPs. This gender trend was reversed for PAs. Of the total sample, 76% reported high job satisfaction and 77% had high levels of perceived job autonomy. There was no significant difference between the study sample and the mental health norms in emotional exhaustion (EE). Our sample had significantly less feelings of depersonalization (DP) and higher feelings of personal accomplishment (PA). Psychological Associates felt significantly less personal accomplishment than the other groups. Predictors for the total sample indicated younger practitioners and those with low job satisfaction had significantly higher burnout, as did males when compared to their female cohorts. Some types of jobs were more likely to contribute to burnout than others. Membership in their local area professional organization lessened the chances for burnout significantly. Predictors for categories of psychologists indicated that males in the LPHCP and LP-CP groups were at higher risk than females. Further, for LP-CPs low job satisfaction and job autonomy, as well as job sites, were significant. Those in this group who worked as school psychologists were at the highest risk for burnout. Job dissatisfaction was the major predictor of burnout for psychological associates. Practitioners working in state or government agencies, school systems and administrative jobs generally had higher burnout than those on a university faculty or in private practice. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

The yeast STM1 protein binds G*G multiplex nucleic acids in vitro and associates with ribosomes in vivo

The formation of triple helical, or triplex DNA has been suggested to occur in several cellular processes such as transcription, replication, and recombination. Our laboratory previously found proteins in HeLa nuclear extracts and in S. cerevisiae whole cell extracts that avidly bound a Purine-motif (Pu) triplex probe in gel shift assays, or EMSA. In order to identify a triplex DNA-binding protein, we used conventional and affinity chromatography to purify the major Pu triplex-binding protein in yeast. Peptide microsequencing and data base searches identified this protein as the product of the STM1 gene. Confirmation that Stm1p is a Pu triplex-binding protein was obtained by EMSA using both recombinant Stm1p and whole cell extracts from stm1Δ yeast. Stm1p had previously been identified as G4p2, a G-quartet DNA- and RNA-binding protein. To study the cellular role and identify the nucleic acid ligand of Stm1p in vivo, we introduced an HA epitope at either the N- or C-terminus of Stm1p and performed immunoprecipitations with the HA.11 mAb. Using peptide microsequencing and Northern analysis, we positively identified a subset of both large and small subunit ribosomal proteins and all four rRNAs as associating with Stm1p. DNase I treatment did not affect the association of Stm1p with ribosomal components, but RNase A treatment abolished the association with all ribosomal proteins and RNA, suggesting this association is RNA-dependent. Sucrose gradient fractionation followed by Western and EMSA analysis confirmed that Stm1p associates with intact 80S monosomes, but not polysomes. The presence of additional, unidentified RNA in the Stm1p-immunoprecipitate, and the absence of tRNAs and elongation factors suggests that Stm1p binds RNA and could be involved in the regulation of translation. Immunofluorescence microscopy data showed Stm1p to be located throughout the cytoplasm, with a specific movement to the bud during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. A dramatically flocculent, large cell phenotype is observed when Stm1p has a C-terminal HA tag in a protease-deficient strain background. When STM1 is deleted in this background, the same phenotype is not observed and the deletion yeast grow very slowly compared to the wild-type. These data suggest that STM1 is not essential, but plays a role in cell growth by interacting with an RNP complex that may contain G*G multiplex RNA. ^

Heregulin -beta 1 directly associates with RhoA via the immunoglobulin -like domain thereby modulating breast cancer metastasis-related properties

Heregulins constitute a family of growth factors belonging to the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family. Breast cancers that overexpress specific members of the EGF receptor family (EGFR, ErbB2, ErbB3, ErbB4) have increased metastatic potential, and Heregulin-β1 (HRGβ1), a ligand for ErbB3 and ErbB4, has also been shown to induce metastasis-related properties in breast cancer cells in vitro. The secreted form of the HRGβ1 is composed of five distinct structural domains, including the N-terminal domain, an immunoglobulin-like domain (IgG-like), a glycosylation domain, an EGF-like domain, and a β1-specific domain. Of these, the EGF-like domain is well characterized for its function in metastasis-related properties as well as its structure. However, the contributions of the other HRGβ1 domains in breast cancer metastasis remains unclear. ^ To investigate this, HRGβ1 proteins with targeted domain deletions were purified and subjected to assays for metastasis-related properties, including aggregation, invasion, activation of EGFR family members, and motility of breast cancer cells. These assays showed that retaining the EGF-like domain of HRGβ1 is important for activation of EGFRs. Interestingly, the HRGβ1 protein lacking the IgG-like domain (NGEB) led to a decrease in breast cancer cell motility, indicating the IgG-like domain modulates cell motility, an important step in cancer metastasis. ^ To understand the underlying mechanisms, I performed protein sequence and structural analysis of HRGβ1 and identified that the IgG-like domain of HRGβ1 shares sequence homology and three-dimensional structural similarity with the IgG-like domain of TRIO. TRIO is a cytoplasmic protein that directly associates with RhoA, a GTPase involved in cell reorganization and cell motility. Therefore, I hypothesized that HRGβ1 may translocate inside the breast cancer cells through receptor mediated endocytosis and bind to RhoA via its IgG-like domain. I show wild type HRGβ1 but not NGEB binds RhoA in vitro and in vivo, leading to RhoA activation. Inhibition of HRG-β1 internalization via endocytosis disrupted HRGβ1 binding to RhoA. Additionally, breast cancer cell motility induced by HRG-β1 is reduced after treatment with inhibitors to both endocytosis and RhoA function, similar to levels seen with NGEB treatment. ^ Thus, in addition to the well-known role of HRGβ1 as an extracellular stimulator of the EGFR family members, HRGβ1 also functions within the cell as a binding partner and activator of RhoA to modulate cancer cell motility. ^