Estimates of hospital and physician costs of epilepsy in the United States for 1995 comparing the provider -based survey method and a patient -based medical charts and billing method

This investigation compares two different methodologies for calculating the national cost of epilepsy: provider-based survey method (PBSM) and the patient-based medical charts and billing method (PBMC&BM). The PBSM uses the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) as the sources of utilization. The PBMC&BM uses patient data, charts and billings, to determine utilization rates for specific components of hospital, physician and drug prescriptions. ^ The 1995 hospital and physician cost of epilepsy is estimated to be $722 million using the PBSM and $1,058 million using the PBMC&BM. The difference of $336 million results from $136 million difference in utilization and $200 million difference in unit cost. ^ Utilization. The utilization difference of $136 million is composed of an inpatient variation of $129 million, $100 million hospital and $29 million physician, and an ambulatory variation of $7 million. The $100 million hospital variance is attributed to inclusion of febrile seizures in the PBSM, $−79 million, and the exclusion of admissions attributed to epilepsy, $179 million. The former suggests that the diagnostic codes used in the NHDS may not properly match the current definition of epilepsy as used in the PBMC&BM. The latter suggests NHDS errors in the attribution of an admission to the principal diagnosis. ^ The $29 million variance in inpatient physician utilization is the result of different per-day-of-care physician visit rates, 1.3 for the PBMC&BM versus 1.0 for the PBSM. The absence of visit frequency measures in the NHDS affects the internal validity of the PBSM estimate and requires the investigator to make conservative assumptions. ^ The remaining ambulatory resource utilization variance is $7 million. Of this amount, $22 million is the result of an underestimate of ancillaries in the NHAMCS and NAMCS extrapolations using the patient visit weight. ^ Unit cost. The resource cost variation is $200 million, inpatient is $22 million and ambulatory is $178 million. The inpatient variation of $22 million is composed of $19 million in hospital per day rates, due to a higher cost per day in the PBMC&BM, and $3 million in physician visit rates, due to a higher cost per visit in the PBMC&BM. ^ The ambulatory cost variance is $178 million, composed of higher per-physician-visit costs of $97 million and higher per-ancillary costs of $81 million. Both are attributed to the PBMC&BM's precise identification of resource utilization that permits accurate valuation. ^ Conclusion. Both methods have specific limitations. The PBSM strengths are its sample designs that lead to nationally representative estimates and permit statistical point and confidence interval estimation for the nation for certain variables under investigation. However, the findings of this investigation suggest the internal validity of the estimates derived is questionable and important additional information required to precisely estimate the cost of an illness is absent. ^ The PBMC&BM is a superior method in identifying resources utilized in the physician encounter with the patient permitting more accurate valuation. However, the PBMC&BM does not have the statistical reliability of the PBSM; it relies on synthesized national prevalence estimates to extrapolate a national cost estimate. While precision is important, the ability to generalize to the nation may be limited due to the small number of patients that are followed. ^

Estimation of male-to-female ratios of mutation rate in primates and rodents

Haldane (1935) developed a method for estimating the male-to-female ratio of mutation rate ($\alpha$) by using sex-linked recessive genetic disease, but in six different studies using hemophilia A data the estimates of $\alpha$ varied from 1.2 to 29.3. Direct genomic sequencing is a better approach, but it is laborious and not readily applicable to non-human organisms. To study the sex ratios of mutation rate in various mammals, I used an indirect method proposed by Miyata et al. (1987). This method takes advantage of the fact that different chromosomes segregate differently between males and females, and uses the ratios of mutation rate in sequences on different chromosomes to estimate the male-to-female ratio of mutation rate. I sequenced the last intron of ZFX and ZFY genes in 6 species of primates and 2 species of rodents; I also sequenced the partial genomic sequence of the Ube1x and Ube1y genes of mice and rats. The purposes of my study in addition to estimation of $\alpha$'s in different mammalian species, are to test the hypothesis that most mutations are replication dependent and to examine the generation-time effect on $\alpha$. The $\alpha$ value estimated from the ZFX and ZFY introns of the six primate specise is ${\sim}$6. This estimate is the same as an earlier estimate using only 4 species of primates, but the 95% confidence interval has been reduced from (2, 84) to (2, 33). The estimate of $\alpha$ in the rodents obtained from Zfx and Zfy introns is ${\sim}$1.9, and that deriving from Ube1x and Ube1y introns is ${\sim}$2. Both estimates have a 95% confidence interval from 1 to 3. These two estimates are very close to each other, but are only one-third of that of the primates, suggesting a generation-time effect on $\alpha$. An $\alpha$ of 6 in primates and 2 in rodents are close to the estimates of the male-to-female ratio of the number of germ-cell divisions per generation in humans and mice, which are 6 and 2, respectively, assuming the generation time in humans is 20 years and that in mice is 5 months. These findings suggest that errors during germ-cell DNA replication are the primary source of mutation and that $\alpha$ decreases with decreasing length of generation time. ^