Management and outcomes of anorectal infection in the cancer patient

Background. The objective of this retrospective cohort study is to examine the presentation and outcomes for a contemporary series of cancer patients with anorectal infection. In addition, we seek to identify factors which are associated with surgical intervention. ^ Methods. The study cohort was identified from ICD-9 codes for diagnosis of infection of the anal and rectal region and patients who underwent a surgical oncology consultation between 1/2000 and 12/2006. Clinical presentation, treatment rendered, and outcomes were retrospectively recorded. ^ Results. Of the 100 patients evaluated by the surgical oncology service for anorectal infection, 42 were treated non-operatively and 58 underwent surgical intervention. Factors associated with surgical intervention based on logistic multivariable analysis included the diagnosis of an abscess (odds ratio [OR] 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-38.5) and the documentation of erythema on physical examination (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1-8.4). Thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50,000) was associated with non-operative management (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.7). Incision and drainage was the most common surgical procedure (79%) while a wide debridement for a necrotizing soft tissue infection was required in 2 patients. Infection-specific 90-day mortality was only 1% (N=1). However, the median overall survival for the entire cohort was only 14.4 months (95% CI 7.9-19.5). ^ Conclusions. Non-operative management is a reasonable treatment option for anorectal infection in patients with cancer. Identification of an abscess, erythema on physical exam, and thrombocytopenia were associated with management strategy. Although rare, necrotizing soft tissue infections are associated with significant mortality. ^

Environmental, health and safety cost benefit analysis in the United States chemical industry

The purpose of this research project is to determine whether there is a cost/benefit to allocating financial and other company-related resources to improve environmental, health and safety performance beyond that which is required by law. The issue of whether a company benefits from spending dollars to achieve environmental, health and safety performance beyond legal compliance is an important issue to the chemical manufacturing industry in the United States because of the voluminous and complex legal requirements impacting environmental, health and safety expenditures. The cost/benefit issue has practical significance because many U.S. chemical manufacturing companies base their environmental, health and safety management strategies on just achieving and maintaining compliance with legal requirements when in reality this strategy may actually be a higher cost way of managing environmental, health and safety practices. This difference in environmental, health and safety management strategy is being investigated to determine if managing environmental, health and safety to achieve performance beyond that which is required by law results in a greater benefit to companies in the U.S. chemical manufacturing sector.