The Personal Background and Preparation Survey Early Identifies Nursing Students at Risk for Attrition

Introduction Nursing student attrition continues to negatively impact the supply of nurses and nursing workforce diversity. Little research has addressed student attributes affecting nursing student attrition today. Research with college undergraduates has indicated that noncognitive attributes influence academic achievement and retention as much as academic attributes. Early identification of such attributes can help students to timely access appropriate services, providing improved opportunities for success. However, convenient, valid, quantitative, reliable assessment instruments appropriate for nursing students have been lacking. The Personal Background and Preparation Survey (PBPS) addresses the need for such a tool. [See PDF for complete abstract]

An Innovative Phase I Trial Design Allowing for the Identification of Multiple Potential Maximum Tolerated Doses with Combination Therapy of Targeted Agents

Treatment for cancer often involves combination therapies used both in medical practice and clinical trials. Korn and Simon listed three reasons for the utility of combinations: 1) biochemical synergism, 2) differential susceptibility of tumor cells to different agents, and 3) higher achievable dose intensity by exploiting non-overlapping toxicities to the host. Even if the toxicity profile of each agent of a given combination is known, the toxicity profile of the agents used in combination must be established. Thus, caution is required when designing and evaluating trials with combination therapies. Traditional clinical design is based on the consideration of a single drug. However, a trial of drugs in combination requires a dose-selection procedure that is vastly different than that needed for a single-drug trial. When two drugs are combined in a phase I trial, an important trial objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The MTD is defined as the dose level below the dose at which two of six patients experience drug-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). In phase I trials that combine two agents, more than one MTD generally exists, although all are rarely determined. For example, there may be an MTD that includes high doses of drug A with lower doses of drug B, another one for high doses of drug B with lower doses of drug A, and yet another for intermediate doses of both drugs administered together. With classic phase I trial designs, only one MTD is identified. Our new trial design allows identification of more than one MTD efficiently, within the context of a single protocol. The two drugs combined in our phase I trial are temsirolimus and bevacizumab. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway which is fundamental for tumor growth and metastasis. One mechanism of tumor resistance to antiangiogenic therapy is upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) which mediates responses to hypoxic conditions. Temsirolimus has resulted in reduced levels of HIF-1α making this an ideal combination therapy. Dr. Donald Berry developed a trial design schema for evaluating low, intermediate and high dose levels of two drugs given in combination as illustrated in a recently published paper in Biometrics entitled “A Parallel Phase I/II Clinical Trial Design for Combination Therapies.” His trial design utilized cytotoxic chemotherapy. We adapted this design schema by incorporating greater numbers of dose levels for each drug. Additional dose levels are being examined because it has been the experience of phase I trials that targeted agents, when given in combination, are often effective at dosing levels lower than the FDA-approved dose of said drugs. A total of thirteen dose levels including representative high, intermediate and low dose levels of temsirolimus with representative high, intermediate, and low dose levels of bevacizumab will be evaluated. We hypothesize that our new trial design will facilitate identification of more than one MTD, if they exist, efficiently and within the context of a single protocol. Doses gleaned from this approach could potentially allow for a more personalized approach in dose selection from among the MTDs obtained that can be based upon a patient’s specific co-morbid conditions or anticipated toxicities.

PRKCa: Identification of a Novel Downstream Target of WT1

Wilms tumor is a childhood tumor of the kidney arising from the undifferentiated metanephric mesenchyme. Tumorigenesis is attributed to a number of genetic and epigenetic alterations. In 20% of Wilms tumors, Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) undergoes inactivating homozygous mutations causing loss of function of the zinc finger transcription factor it encodes. It is hypothesized that mutations in WT1 result in dysregulation of downstream target genes, leading to aberrant kidney development and/or Wilms tumor. These downstream target genes are largely unknown, and identification is important for further understanding Wilms tumor development. Heatmap data of human Wilms tumor protein expression, generated by reverse phase protein assay analysis (RPPA), show significant correlation between WT1 mutation status and low PRKCα expression (p= 0.00013); additionally, p-PRKCα (S657) also shows decreased expression in these samples (p= 0.00373). These data suggest that the WT1 transcription factor regulates PRKCα expression, and that PRKCα plays a potential role in Wilms tumor tumorigenesis. We hypothesize that the WT1 transcription factor directly/indirectly regulates PRKCα and mutations occurring in WT1 lead to decreased expression of PRKCα. Prkcα and Wt1 have been shown to co-localize in E14.5 mesenchymal cells of the developing kidney. siRNA knockdown, in-vivo ablation, and tet-inducible expression of Wt1 each independently confirm regulation of Prkcα expression by Wt1 at both RNA and protein levels, and investigation into possible WT1 binding sites in PRKCα regulatory regions has identified multiple sites to be confirmed by luciferase reporter constructs. With the goal of identifying WT1 and PRKCα downstream targets, RPPA analysis of protein expression in mesenchymal cell culture, following lentiviral delivered shRNA knockdown of Wt1 and shRNA knockdown of Prkcα, will be carried out. Apart from Wilms tumor, WT1 also plays an important role in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). WT1 mutation status has been implicated, controversially, as an independent poor-prognosis factor in leukemia, leading to decreased probability of overall survival, complete remission, and disease free survival. RPPA analysis of AML patient samples showed significant decreases in PRKCα/p-PRKCα protein expression in a subset of patients (Kornblau, personal communication); therefore, the possible role of WT1 and PRKCα in leukemia disease progression is an additional focus of this study. WT1 mutation analysis of diploid leukemia patient samples revealed two patients with mutations predicted to affect WT1 activity; of these two samples, only one corresponded to the low PRKCα expression cohort. Further characterization of the role of WT1 in AML, and further understanding of WT1 regulated PRKCα expression, will be gained following RPPA analysis of protein expression in HL60 leukemia cell lines with lentiviral delivered shRNA knockdown of WT1 and shRNA knockdown of PRKCα.